I for one, see the power of this feature and welcome it back in the
fold. We are moving in a direction that would either 1) place our own
VTIs under the diag namespace (ugly) or 2) shipping a slightly modified
form (ugly) or 3) petitioning to get this added back in.
The VTI API should have the
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have logged enhancement request 716 to track the re-enabling of
customer-defined Virtual Table Interfaces (VTIs). A little history follows:
I can imagine that the non-standard nature of VTI declaration was an
issue. Are there other issues? Has anyone given some thought
