So, if I tally up the contents of this thread as an informal vote, we've got:
derbyrun - 1/2 (me), 1 (John), 1/2 (Kristian), 1 (Susan), 1
(Michelle), 1/2 (Jean), 1 (Satheesh)
runderby - 1/2 (me), 1 Dan, 1/2 (Kristian), 1/2 (Jean), 1 (Dag)
That's 5 1/2 for derbyrun.jar and 3 1/2 for
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
goderby.jar
On 3/2/06, John Embretsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like
derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it
:)
Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
functionality of the new jar file in
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
How about 'derbyutils.jar' ? -RajeshOn 3/2/06, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, John Embretsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it :)Eight characters is
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
Hi Rajesh,
'derbyutils.jar' does not say me much. What is in there? To me it sounds
as it contains some additional programs/tools you can use on/with Derby.
Also, what's the difference between 'derbytools.jar' and 'derbyutils.jar'?
Just
--- Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
I like derbygo.jar or derbyrun.jar. I think it's advantageous for the
derby jars to sort together.
-- Michelle
Kristian Waagan wrote:
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
Hi Rajesh,
'derbyutils.jar' does not say me much. What is in there? To me it
sounds as it contains
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
runderby: +1
Dag
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
goderby.jar
runderby.jar
Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
andrew
I like
12 matches
Mail list logo