include ConcurrencyTest into a suite
Key: DERBY-1558
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1558
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Test
Components: Test
Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 424001/2006-07-20 19:46:12 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
NA NA NANA SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I couldn't see that the JUnit test
org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbcapi.ConcurrencyTest
is run anywhere. Seems to work fine for me, is it meant to be in the
jdbcapi.runall suite list as are the other JUnit tests in that package?
Hi,
The
when receiving a single EXTDTA object representing a BLOB, the server do not
need to read it into memory before inserting it into the DB
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_12422627 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-147:
--
Hi Bernd,
Thank you for providing the patch. I'm sorry no one has picked it up
yet. I had a brief look at it,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1535?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-1535:
-
Attachment: DERBY-1513_1535_2.patch
Description of the patch:
* Avoid expanding data into memory twice when NetworkServer receive binary
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-528?page=comments#action_12422633 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-528:
-
I am far from being an expert on this area of the code. The changes, however,
are very well commented and, coupled with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-528?page=comments#action_12422636 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-528:
--
My functional concerns about 10.2 client not working with 10.1 server have been
taken care of by reverting to the
In DERBY-528 Rick said about Francois' patch:
I am far from being an expert on this area of the code. The changes, however, are
very well commented and, coupled with the extensive notes in this JIRA, allow me to
understand the patch.
Thanks Francois and others for striving for this standard
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1539?page=comments#action_12422643 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1539:
--
WIll a Permissions descriptor now change its hashCode during its lifetime? From
the code it looks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_12422647 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-147:
--
Hi Bernd,
When you resubmit your patch, please
1) Assign yourself
2) Mark the patch available checkbox. (which
When receiving EXTDTA object, the client should avoid keeping the entire LOB in
memory for large LOBs
-
Key: DERBY-1560
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1272?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1272:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Unchecking patch available as more investigation is needed for the security
manager issue with sysinfo printing to
Analyze the existing JDBC JUnit test classes for common methods that should be
utilites rather than specific to a test.
---
Key: DERBY-1561
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1561?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1561:
-
Component/s: Test
Analyze the existing JDBC JUnit test classes for common methods that should
be utilites rather than specific to a test.
Have BaseJDBCTestCase have a Connection field to cover the common case where
one connection is used.
Key: DERBY-1562
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1447?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1447:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
I'll uncheck patch available based on John's review.
I think instructions on how to do this would be a great
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1194?page=comments#action_12422658 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1194:
---
Halley, are you actively working on this issue? Do you still need more
reviews of the patch after John's review?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-482?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-482:
-
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Unchecking Patch Available after Mamta's comments. Jeff has unassigned himself
from this issue so probably it is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-402?page=comments#action_12422663 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-402:
--
This patch posted in February, looks like it is ready for review but is
currently unassigned. Jeff submitted a patch
derbynet/ShutDownDBWhenNSShutsDownTest.junit fails on Solaris sparc
---
Key: DERBY-1563
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1563
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Test
David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, Knut. Yes, it's true, this works, but I thought the whole point
of rewriting the client so that client.am.SqlException doesn't extend
java.sql.SQLException was so that we could directly use and throw the
java.sql exceptions rather than our
wisconsin.sql test failed in DerbyNet framework, VM for network server got
OutOfMemoryError
---
Key: DERBY-1564
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1564
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1564?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1564:
Attachment: wisconsin.tar.gz
Attaching log from test (wisconsin.tar.gz)
wisconsin.sql test failed in DerbyNet framework, VM for network
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1564?page=comments#action_12422684 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1564:
-
Do note that that there was not output in the outfile, and the diff file is
therefore the entire master
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-815?page=comments#action_12422686 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-815:
--
Should we uncheck patch available on this issue since it needs to be updated to
apply?
Prevent unneeded object
I did a little PatchListMaintenance this morning and we currently have
dropped down below the 20 patch mark. To help keep the patch list a
small fast moving list, please check your patches are ready for review
and up to date [1]. You can also look at the full patch list [2] for
issues you
That's quite a title for a Wiki page :)
Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Db-derby Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DanDebrunner:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/KillDerbyTestHarness
New page:
=
Thanks, Knut.
I was unaware that part of the intention was to reduce the number of
master files. My patch simply updates existing master files with new
output. Are you saying that master files that are currently in
DerbyNetClient could be removed because the master files in the
top-level
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1521:
Attachment: d1521-patch1-v1.diff
d1521-patch1-v1.status
Attaching a patch 'd1521-patch1-v1.diff' which modifies UpgradeTester to test
the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1521:
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Upgrade test needs to be enhanced to test grant revoke
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-688:
--
Attachment: d688_phase1_v3.patch
Attaching an updated patch synced with the latest codeline. The only
difference between _v2 and _v3 is that the client master file for
Hi Francois,
Thanks for the great explanation for the patch. I'll review it in detail and hope to post comments in a day or two.
Thanks,
Sunitha.
On 7/20/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manish Khettry wrote:
And on the issue of using ant-- why not have ant
targets in java/testing to run standard suites? much
easier to get a developer to type ant derbyall and
have it do the needful (setup classpath, invoke the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1373?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1373:
---
Attachment: 10.1_derby1373.diff.txt
I would like this fix to go into 10.1 branch.
The below merge command to put this fix to 10.1 does not
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1357?page=all ]
A B resolved DERBY-1357.
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed] (was: [Patch Available, Release Note
Needed])
Resolving issue as the patch was committed by Satheesh with svn
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-781?page=all ]
A B resolved DERBY-781.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: [Existing Application Impact, Release Note Needed] (was:
[Existing Application Impact, Patch Available, Release Note Needed])
Resolving issue
Adjust documentation to comply with latest Apache copyright/license requirements
Key: DERBY-1565
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1565
Project: Derby
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
And I think the name for the Wiki (killDerbyTestHarness) is just perfect.
:-) It's just my way to change the mindset of everyone.
It may not be a surprise, but I'm very interested in this. :-)
Excellent!
Re 3, I think we should start with converting tests where the
On 7/21/06, Sunitha Kambhampati (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
So, I am attaching a patch 10.1_derby1373.diff.txt for 10.1 codeline. Please
note, it is the same changes as derby1373.diff.txt.
svn stat:
M java\engine\org\apache\derby\impl\services\jce\JCECipherFactory.java
M
Thank you Guys for all the help with this.
Knut, thank you for pointing to DERBY-1545.On 7/21/06, Sunitha Kambhampati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Francois,Thanks for the great explanation for the patch.I'll review it in detail and hope to post comments in a day or two.
Thanks,Sunitha.
Deepa Remesh wrote:
I just took a look at this patch when I saw A + mentioned in the
svn status. When merging and creating a new patch for a branch, I have
seen that A + in svn status indicates only property change for new
files. The contents of the new files are not added to the patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422723 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
From the FAQ at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
With few exceptions, all human-readable
Thanks to David for taking DERBY-1377. That leaves one last unassigned
blocker: DERBY-936.
DERBY-936 is a Documentation issue. Recently, there was some discussion
about how to identify outstanding 10.2 documentation issues. This one is
definitely at the top of the list.
Regards,
-Rick
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422725 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
The COPYRIGHT file in our root directory contains copyrights for IBM. Does
anyone know if this needs to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1565?page=comments#action_12422726 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1565:
-
I think two changes are needed:
1) Update the DITA source files to include the ASF header in comments
2) Update
On 7/20/06, Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
API for configuration information in Derby's JUnit tests should through
instance methods of the base classes, not static methods and static fields
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422727 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
I think the IBM copyright belongs in the NOTICE file --
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1373?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1373:
---
Attachment: 10.1_explicitsvnadd_derby1373.diff.txt
In the earlier patch 10.1_derby1373.diff.txt' the new files didnt get added to
the patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1539?page=comments#action_12422730 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1539:
I want to start out by saying that this is my first time ever working with
hashCode so I am new to this part of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1271?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1271:
-
Attachment: derby-1271_devGuide_v01.diff
devGuide_v01.tar
Attaching patch derby-1271_devGuide_v01.diff and tar of corresponding html and
Also, should these be added to the list in the SQL reserved words section in the Reference Manual?
On 7/20/06, Laura Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The JIRA issue that added these functions (DERBY-475) does not list any information that describes the functions. What do you recommend as a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1517?page=comments#action_12422733 ]
Francois Orsini commented on DERBY-1517:
I know you figured it out already Kathey - am just adding a comment here for
the record.
You're right that there
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1517?page=all ]
Francois Orsini reassigned DERBY-1517:
--
Assignee: Francois Orsini
Derby Network Client to handle list of SECMEC(s) returned by
existing/released DRDA Derby Network Servers
Laura Stewart wrote:
Which derby docs need this change? Developers Guide? Reference Guide?
On 7/17/06, *Stan Bradbury (JIRA)* derby-dev@db.apache.org
mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
Document new SYSCS_DIAG tables
---
Key:
Hi,
After working on much of the ground work for revoke, I have finally come to implement the revoke privilege such that only the objects that depend on the specific permission type being revoked should drop themselves.
I thought I could do that by having dependency manager sendspecific action
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1271?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1271:
-
Attachment: derby-1271_toolsGuide_v01.diff
toolsGuide_v01.tar
Attaching patch derby-1271_toolsGuide_v01.diff and the correponding html and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-1029.
Resolution: Fixed
Backout boolean work from the 10.2 branch immediately after the branch is
created
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_12422745 ]
Bernd Ruehlicke commented on DERBY-147:
---
Simple question:
Is most of the source checked in from Linux /Unix ? It seems to me when I
checout the code it gets
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-887?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-887:
---
Assignee: (was: Rick Hillegas)
Unassigning myself from this issue. We have moved out the timeframe for fixing
this bug.
Select statement returns
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-887?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-887:
Fix Version/s: (was: 10.3.0.0)
Detaching this issue from 10.3. Fixing it seems to require changing the
non-ANSI behavior of implicit and explicit casts.
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 7/20/06, Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
API for configuration information in Derby's JUnit tests should
through instance methods of the base classes, not static methods and
static fields
Hi Dan,
I dimly grasp what you mean, but
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_12422749 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-147:
-
Last time this patch was reviewed, there was also another concern about truely
ambigious columns, like:
Select
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-499?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas reassigned DERBY-499:
---
Assignee: (was: Rick Hillegas)
Unassigning myself from this issue. If someone wants to tackle this in the
future, please consult DERBY-1029. In order
Laura Stewart wrote:
Also, should these be added to the list in the SQL reserved words section
in the Reference Manual?
No.
Dan.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-1459.
Resolution: Fixed
Early load of Derby driver with JDBC 4.0 autoloading can lead to derby
properties not being processed or derby boot time actions consuming
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-930?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-930.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: [Existing Application Impact, Release Note Needed] (was:
[Release Note Needed, Existing Application Impact])
Closing this
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-781?page=comments#action_12422753 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-781:
-
I think it would be good to modify this improvement description, as it will
likely be picked up by release notes
The following section of the Reference Guide documents our known SQLStates:
Reference Guide-Derby exception messages and SQL states-SQLState and
error message reference
Do we update this section with each feature release? If so, is there
some machinery to automate the drudgery?
Thanks,
On 7/21/06, Rick Hillegas (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
Detaching this issue from 10.3. Fixing it seems to require changing
the non-ANSI behavior of implicit and explicit casts. Changing this
behavior probably will affect existing applications and it seems to be
the sort of fix which we
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 424368/2006-07-21 18:02:27 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1679678 2 173.45% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
On 7/21/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following section of the Reference Guide documents our known SQLStates:
Reference Guide-Derby exception messages and SQL states-SQLState and
error message reference
Do we update this section with each feature release? If so, is there
some
Document SQLStates in 10.2
--
Key: DERBY-1566
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1566
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
Thanks, Andrew. I have create DERBY-1566 to track this issue.
Cheers,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 7/21/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following section of the Reference Guide documents our known
SQLStates:
Reference Guide-Derby exception messages and SQL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422760 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Not to complicate things, but there was a big round-about with this in the
early days of Derby.
The 'resolution'
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_12422761 ]
Bernd Ruehlicke commented on DERBY-147:
---
OK got it perfectly working now.
I also refactored the getOrderByColumn(String, TableName) to call the
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 7/21/06, Rick Hillegas (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
Detaching this issue from 10.3. Fixing it seems to require changing
the non-ANSI behavior of implicit and explicit casts. Changing this
behavior probably will affect existing applications and it seems to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422762 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
This FAQ in http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html is relevant to
Andrew's comment:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422764 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
The current headers have ASF copyright notices, e.g.:
Copyright 1997, 2004 The Apache Software Foundation or its
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1227?page=comments#action_12422765 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1227:
Thanks Mike into looking at this. Here is the checkin comment:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-781?page=comments#action_12422768 ]
A B commented on DERBY-781:
---
Oh wait, check that last comment. That was only for the summary; I see now
that you were talking about the actual description. Sorry.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-781?page=comments#action_12422767 ]
A B commented on DERBY-781:
---
I think it would be good to modify this improvement description
Seems like this could be a simple as removing the word union from the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422770 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Depends on what the defintion of an ASF copyright notice is.
Could be:
A) A copyright notice
I am still looking for a recommended source for the descriptions and syntax...
On 7/21/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laura Stewart wrote: Also, should these be added to the list in the SQL reserved words section
in the Reference Manual?No.Dan.-- Laura Stewart
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422776 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
B) A copyright notice statement where the copyright is actually held by the
Apache Software Foundation
Since the
***(LS) The file that you name is the in Ref Manual, not the Server
and Administration Guide... I see the section in the Reference Manual
that you mean.
On 7/21/06, Stanley Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laura Stewart wrote:
Which derby docs need this change? Developers Guide? Reference
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1505?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1505:
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Reference Manual - Limitations of triggered-SQL-statement do not match
current behaviour
generateClientMessageTest.sh is broken
--
Key: DERBY-1567
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1567
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Test
Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
Laura Stewart wrote:
I am still looking for a recommended source for the descriptions and
syntax...
I updated DERBY-1548 yesterday.
Dan.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1567?page=all ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-1567:
-
Attachment: TestClientMessages.java
uploaded the generated file, svn at 423976.
generateClientMessageTest.sh is broken
BTW, I think the issue is really with just triggers.
Views can only depend on select privileges, since we don't allow DML through views. So,when a ViewDescriptor gets an action anything other than REVOKE_SELECT_PRIVILEGE from dependency manager, it can simply ignore them. And for a
Point taken. Give me some time to figure out the basic mechanics (testing, orderby.sql/orderby.out, why svn is chekcing out the files with lits of tabs and spaces ... etc. havn't worked with Derby for a year so need to get back to speed.)- Original Message From: Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1537?page=comments#action_12422782 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1537:
---
RegressionSearchAndDestroy hint:
This issue looks like low hanging fruit for anyone wishing to participate in
the
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 424430/2006-07-21 21:43:00 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
6679673 2 146.57% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
I have to say I don't understand where we stand at this point. If
anybody can give me a recipe of what I should be doing I would
appreciate it...
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422783 ]
OK, since you've created this, I'll close DERBY-254, as I was keeping it
open because of the documentation task. I'll add a note linking to
DERBY-1566.
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks, Andrew. I have create DERBY-1566 to track this issue.
Cheers,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-254?page=all ]
David Van Couvering resolved DERBY-254.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Release Note Needed])
Resolving this issue and removing Release Note Needed as DERBY-1566 is tracking
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1539?page=comments#action_12422793 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1539:
--
Thanks Mamta for looking into this - I'm still concerned that the object has
the ability to change
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1539?page=comments#action_12422796 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1539:
--
Could you explain more what you mean by:
Hence, when dependency manager works with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1567?page=all ]
David Van Couvering reassigned DERBY-1567:
--
Assignee: David Van Couvering
generateClientMessageTest.sh is broken
--
Key:
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo