Agreed. Maybe I should save my efforts for the new, community-based logo
;-).
2011/3/16 Paulo José Amaro paul...@gmail.com
Same here, B.
Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without
the
other proposed changes, sadly.
I think I'll not do help with that (and
B
2011/3/15 Bernhard Dippold bernh...@familie-dippold.at:
Hi Joey, all
I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey!
Johannes Bausch schrieb:
Hey,
following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a
step backward, but I see that the connected ligature
2011/3/15 Catalin catalinf...@gmail.com
B
I respect your answer, but it would be very helpful if you told us why you
chose B over A =).
@Bernhard: thanks.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All
My vote: B
Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't consistent
across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match anything else.
-Daniel Merker
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold
bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote:
Hi Joey, all
I think
Same here, B.
Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without the
other proposed changes, sadly.
I think I'll not do help with that (and probably be counter-productive), but
my personal taste is still for C [1].
~Paulo
[1] -
Hi Joey, all
I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey!
Johannes Bausch schrieb:
Hey,
following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a
step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main
concern.
If I understand the comments right, some
