Hey Luis,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Luis Menina wrote:
> Toms a écrit :
>
>> 1) System tray - applets that could end up in system tray, most
>> probably contextually - like, when they are needed or make sense. Or,
>> sometimes per user request in preferences (something like a "show in
>> s
> Toms a écrit :
>
> > 1) System tray - applets that could end up in system tray, most
> > probably contextually - like, when they are needed or make sense. Or,
> > sometimes per user request in preferences (something like a "show in
> > system tray" checkbox for those marginal "nobody knows" case
Toms a écrit :
1) System tray - applets that could end up in system tray, most
probably contextually - like, when they are needed or make sense. Or,
sometimes per user request in preferences (something like a "show in
system tray" checkbox for those marginal "nobody knows" cases). As
pointed out
Le jeudi 14 mai 2009 à 08:25 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> Le mercredi 13 mai 2009 à 22:23 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit :
> > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> > http://l10n.gnome.org.
> >
> > There have been following string additions to module
> > 'gn
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> If we say we have to not only support spidermonkey and JSC, but any
> future hypothetical JS implementation, then we're really committing to
> not only not using language extensions, but _never_ using or creating
> extensions. Basically ha
Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Xan Lopez wrote:
>
> Owen has said that he'd only really miss destructuring assignment I
> think, your opinion is that 'let' is a deal breaker?
>
I'm not saying anything is a dealbreaker, just that I don't agree with
the arguments against language extensions.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Havoc Pennington
wrote:
>> So perhaps it would be a good idea to just stick to a JS defined in
>> some standard widely used for all GNOME code, in order to avoid future
>> headaches, and consider other languages with real self-extension
>> capabilities if we are re
Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Xan Lopez wrote:
> - They claim not all the extensions are well thought out, and that
> some of them make the language more complex and harder to implement in
> an efficient and high-performing way (the specific example for this
> was 'let'). I have no opinion
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Spidermonkey: Mature, good API for extensibility. Nice language
> extensions. (JS 1.7.) Mostly packaged as part of xulrunner, which is
> a problem. Maintained by an organization that has a thorough
> commitment to open source. (That doesn
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2009, 15:54 +0700 schrieb Alexander Tarasov:
> How about "Compas Rose" with current home wind direction on world map?
This list is not for enhancement requests. Please file a ticket in
bugzilla.gnome.org against gnome-panel/clock. Patches always accepted.
andre
--
Hi!
How about "Compas Rose" with current home wind direction on world map?
Something like this: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8662/kawai.png
Does anybody can make it real? :)
Regards,
Alexander.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gn
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:20 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Xan Lopez wrote:
> > We don't maintain the runtimes, we maintain the integration between
> > those runtimes and the platform. AFAIK we do this for a lot of other
> > languages, like Python, Perl
Le jeudi 14 mai 2009, à 01:11 -0400, Robert Carr a écrit :
> I've started the gnome-js-common module tonight and pushed it to GIT
> (just lang.js signals.js and tweener), and by the next Seed release (2
> weeks again...) intend to move a lot of the Seed modules and tests
> there.
Just want to say:
13 matches
Mail list logo
