Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
can you please explain to me, in a short sentence, what do you want to
achieve? not how, but precisely what.
I have said that already: I want to enable the design team to work
productively with the entire GNOME development community.
Right now a small number of
- Mensaje original -
De: Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org
Para: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
CC: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Enviado: lunes 6 de junio de 2011 10:59
Asunto: Re: On the Interaction with the design team
Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
can you please explain to me,
Hey all.
I was planning on staying out of this one, conflict-avoidant creature
that I tend to be. But I'm with Dave:
To sum it all up, I
believe the current dynamic of the design team is doing damage to GNOME
as a community.
I would love to find ways for the design team and the
Hi Allan!
Yes. *I* was annoyed by the recent Deja Dup discussion, and felt that
the developer got short-changed at the end of the day. I was very
annoyed at the systemd as external dependency discussion, and the
message that some people following along the GNOME OS meme sent to
developers on
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:44:06PM +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
* You need to give up your brand Deja Dup if you want to be part of GNOME
* Deja-Dup isn't allowed to exist in parallel as a application
Those requirements are only due to the proposed switch from GNOME Apps
suite to GNOME Core,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi Allan!
Yes. *I* was annoyed by the recent Deja Dup discussion, and felt that
the developer got short-changed at the end of the day. I was very
annoyed at the systemd as external dependency discussion, and the
message that some people following along the GNOME
Hey Allan.
But past interactions have (in my
personal experience) been negative.
Can you elaborate?
Yes, but I was (and am) somewhat hesitant to because I honestly don't
wish to stir pots. I'd rather just move forward in a positive direction.
And perhaps you read my mind in that regard
Hi Dave,
2011/6/6 Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org:
Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
can you please explain to me, in a short sentence, what do you want to
achieve? not how, but precisely what.
I have said that already: I want to enable the design team to work
productively with the entire GNOME
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
To sum it all up, I believe the current dynamic of the design team is doing
damage to GNOME
as a community.
I think what is really doing damage to the community is this kind of
hyperbolic accusation around the design team
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joanmarie Diggs joan...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey Allan.
But past interactions have (in my
personal experience) been negative.
Can you elaborate?
Yes, but I was (and am) somewhat hesitant to because I honestly don't
wish to stir pots. I'd rather just move
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 13:42 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
So, in short, I would like the design team to act like the gnome-utils team.
GNOME design has all the equivalent facilities [1, 2, 3] excluding the
mailing list.
Again, I agree (and have never disagreed)
Hi Olav!
The confusion was cleared up pretty quickly once we moved off
desktop-devel-list.
May I ask why these things move off desktop-devel-list? Maybe I missed
the mail that said that discussion is taking place elsewhere but I don't
think there was one.
Regards,
Johannes
signature.asc
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:37:17PM +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
The confusion was cleared up pretty quickly once we moved off
desktop-devel-list.
May I ask why these things move off desktop-devel-list? Maybe I missed
the mail that said that discussion is taking place elsewhere but I don't
13 matches
Mail list logo
