>> >
>> > Because it's unsupported.
>> >
>> > As someone who works on mutter and gnome-shell, I'm curious: since
>> > when is it unsupported? I've never heard anybody say this before.
>>
>> It's not the default, it's not togglable in System Settings, and it's
>> not been designed for. That
ished language I'll be able to proceed and write a parser and
> command-line tools, which can serve (with their underlying library) as a
> base for larger systems and GUI app integration (Gnote, GTG, etc.)
>
> regards,
> Anatoly
>
>
> On ד', 2013-05-29 at 21:10 +03
Hi Anatoly,
if you really get such simple enough language, you certainly will get
some users.
I see you are planning for more usages, though about TODO apps, did
you see todotxt [1] which is basically a text based todo/GTD. They
have a relatively simple language [2]. Is it similar to what you are
On 24 April 2013 11:57, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon
> wrote:
> > The main point is that so-called "controversial" features does not have
> to
> > be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be
> ship
On 24 April 2013 04:54, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 04:00 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> > On 24 April 2013 02:14, Florian Müllner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari
> > > wrote:
> > > > I think your su
On 24 April 2013 02:14, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari
> wrote:
>
> > I think your suggestion of a "feature" branch can be a worthy
> compromise, though.
>
> Except that Bastien is right - while on a branch, a feature will
> hardly be tested by
On 22 April 2013 19:57, Allan Day wrote:
> Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:36 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> >
> > But on non-touch screens, some people like my mom (whose eyesight is not
> > so great these days) could also benefit from bigger icons, or at least
> > *more c
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> For reference, here is the extra pane functionality in Nautilus:
> http://andreasn.myownb3.com/temp/nau-extra-pane.png
>
> And here is the same feature, but at the window manager level (and for all
> the other apps too):
> http://andreasn.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Federico Mena Quintero
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 00:03 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
>
> > A common language of patterns is an awesome idea. I'd encourage
> > Federico to expand on the subject.
>
> Calum, Allan, and generally the people around the London
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 23:11, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 16:57, Shaun McCance wrote:
>>> Yeah, but how many of those people are going to go to an About
>>> dialog. And if they do, are they really going to be any less
>>> confused by "The GNOME Web developers"? That sounds to me like
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:27, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:04 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> We do you push it so hard to avoid the term "browser"? Browser has
>> been used by non-tech people for a couple of years now.
>
> Because most people do not know what a browser is.
>
Hello,
there is a discussion [1] on the internationalization mailing list
about GNOME 3 core application names, the ambiguous situation they
bring, and the difficulties it brings for translation. I try to
summarize to the best the issue. Read the thread [1] and contact
people for more information.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 18:08, Stefan Sauer wrote:
> On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
>>> Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take
>>> over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 23:21, Stormy Peters wrote:
> Of course, maybe I'm wrong. Perhaps the average user of Linux/GNOME does
> know what GNOME is, knows how to contact the GNOME team
Maybe this is an interesting point to know.
Also from a branding point of view.
Is it important (or not) that
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 14:46, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 13:14, Allan Day wrote:
>>
>> We already have a wealth of data about peoples' experiences with GNOME 3
>
> Allan, this is interesting, what is the main pointer to access this data?
>
All
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 21:20, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The people most likely to respond to an irritating popup that disrupts their
> work
> are people who ...
... do not use GNOME 3.
GNOME 3 is designed to reduce distraction and interruption and to put
you in control. Our new notifications s
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 13:14, Allan Day wrote:
>
> We already have a wealth of data about peoples' experiences with GNOME 3
>
Allan, this is interesting, what is the main pointer to access this data?
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-l
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 14:33, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Patryk Zawadzki
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Felipe Contreras
> > wrote:
> >> Are you serious? That totally and completely speculative and
> >> unrealistic. Have you ever participated in ma
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:34, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
[snip]
Maybe they all lied?
>
Don't you think it is a bit early to speculate on results? (...)
Overall I can see already one clear result, even before the poll has
started:
We do not know who is using GNOME.
Maybe this needs refl
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:28, Stefan Kost wrote:
> On 08/08/11 17:10, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 14:27, Stefan Kost
> wrote:
> >> https://live.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/GtkDocLanguageBindings
> > For Python, we are extending the API that is provided through g-i via
> > "
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 18:35, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> After going through all the feedback, here's the second version of the
> proposed survey.
>
> There is a proposal to delay the survey until 3.2 is released, to try
> to avoid some of the initial negative feedback of 3.0, I guess
21 matches
Mail list logo
