Re: Epiphany now Linux-only (was: [epiphany] Require NetworkManager)

2011-06-24 Thread Xan
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse jas...@humppa.nl wrote: Hi, I'm quite worried about this change... You are aware you have just made Epiphany a Linux-only webbrowser? There is no NM support for any of the BSD nor Solaris. FreeBSD has a Google SoC project, but

Re: Epiphany now Linux-only (was: [epiphany] Require NetworkManager)

2011-06-24 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:52 +0200, Xan wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse jas...@humppa.nl wrote: Hi, I'm quite worried about this change... You are aware you have just made Epiphany a Linux-only webbrowser? There is no NM support for any of the BSD nor

Re: Epiphany now Linux-only (was: [epiphany] Require NetworkManager)

2011-06-24 Thread Claudio Saavedra
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:58:07PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:52 +0200, Xan wrote: this is not particularly a new thing. Of course we could just make it optional on the basis that some people might be interested in using Epiphany outside of GNOME, but our

Re: Epiphany now Linux-only (was: [epiphany] Require NetworkManager)

2011-06-24 Thread Xan Lopez
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Claudio Saavedra csaave...@gnome.org wrote: Actually the dependence on NM is quite soft. We could just depend on the NM service being there and if it's not just not use it. For a bunch of macros that we use and theoretically shouldn't change often we don't need