Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Alexander Mikhaylenko via desktop-devel-list
Hm indeed, not sure why I had that impression. On 15/06/2021 15:48, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:58 +0500, Alexander Mikhaylenko via desktop- devel-list wrote: As far as I know, libgd is pretty much only used for tagged entries nowadays. In GTK4 it's a lot easier to implement

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:58 +0500, Alexander Mikhaylenko via desktop- devel-list wrote: > As far as I know, libgd is pretty much only used for tagged entries > nowadays. In GTK4 it's a lot easier to implement them in-tree than it > was in GTK3, gtk4-demo even has an example. It doesn't take very

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 12:13 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: > Evince bundles the whole libgd just so it can consume a two line cell > renderer for its icon view. In this case, it might be worth just > copy-pasting this specific class and drop the libgd dependency. It never bundled the whole libgd,

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Felipe Borges
Evince bundles the whole libgd just so it can consume a two line cell renderer for its icon view. In this case, it might be worth just copy-pasting this specific class and drop the libgd dependency. Sounds worth it setting up an Initiative* to coordinate the port away from libgd. *

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Alexander Mikhaylenko via desktop-devel-list
As far as I know, libgd is pretty much only used for tagged entries nowadays. In GTK4 it's a lot easier to implement them in-tree than it was in GTK3, gtk4-demo even has an example. On 15/06/2021 14:54, Allan Day wrote: Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list wrote: ... - nautilus -

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-15 Thread Allan Day
Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list wrote: ... > - nautilus > - evince > - totem > - gnome-photos > - gedit In terms of the platform, we're working to consolidate around libhandy/libadwaita. That's what the new HIG documents, and is what we're trying to constrain ourselves to on the

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-14 Thread Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list
Looking at the gnome-world moduleset, the following modules are still using libgd: - nautilus - evince - totem - gnome-photos - gedit Archiving libgd will likely have to wait, considering that all of these are core GNOME applications. Ciao, Emmanuele. On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 17:19, Andre

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 18:18 +0200, Andre Klapper via desktop-devel-list wrote: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd/commits/master hasn't seen changes > for 30 months. Emails to both maintainer addresses listed in the DOAP > file ({cosimoc|malureau}@gnome.org) bounced. Still used:

Re: Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-14 Thread Isaque Galdino via desktop-devel-list
GNOME Notes (bijiben) don't use it anymore, so we are OK with the archive thing. Em seg., 14 de jun. de 2021 às 13:19, Andre Klapper via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> escreveu: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd/commits/master hasn't seen changes > for 30 months. Emails

Is libgd still a thing?

2021-06-14 Thread Andre Klapper via desktop-devel-list
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd/commits/master hasn't seen changes for 30 months. Emails to both maintainer addresses listed in the DOAP file ({cosimoc|malureau}@gnome.org) bounced. Context: Wondering whether to archive; coming from Bugzilla migration. Thanks, andre -- Andre Klapper  |