I fully planned to do so once I know what next version number we'd be
targeting. Minor or point?
Matt
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022, 7:43 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-03-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On 2022-02-25, wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>>default
> >>>the default value of the attribute
>
Interesting, I'll have to have another look. Thanks Stefan!
Matt
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022, 6:38 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-02-15, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > So my tests for scriptcondition return values were using beanshell
> > because I couldn't figure out any way to g
be reported to Ant's notification list.
Matt
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 1:31 PM Matt Benson wrote:
> Thanks, Stefan. Will do.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 12:50 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2022-02-20, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> > The plan from
Thanks, Stefan. Will do.
Matt
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, 12:50 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-02-20, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > The plan from this thread is two years old, so I want to revisit. As
> > of now the extant antlibs seem to have their own repos. If I am
> >
own repos?
Matt
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 4:33 PM Matt Benson wrote:
> Thanks, Stefan! Sounds like a good plan.
>
> Matt
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 9:52 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2020-03-05, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> > What is our current protoco
So my tests for scriptcondition return values were using beanshell because
I couldn't figure out any way to get rhino to return a value from the
script. I can't understand which optional dependencies are present during
the build, where they are, nor how they get there. Are they in the lib of
the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 1:19 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-02-04, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > I am working on a new antlib (discussed a couple of years ago on list),
> and
> > trying to figure out how to get antunit to run tests using Ivy's created
> > classpath
Okay to stick with Java 5 for now, for the 1.9.x reason.
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022, 9:09 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2022-02-09, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we
> should
> > continue to constrain this
I saw the Windows related failure and will fix it today.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 11:16 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello Matt,
>
> That job keeps failing every other time. I haven't had a chance to
> understand why it fails nor do I know what that job is for. I think you
> can ignore
These failures don't seem to be related to my changes. Does anybody have
any idea about them?
Matt
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 1:37 PM Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> See <
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant-Build-from-POMs/120/display/redirect
> >
>
> Changes:
Similarly to the question on Ivy, is there any compelling reason we should
continue to constrain this antlib to its current level of Java (1.)5?
Matt
Java 7 public updates have ended nearly 7 years ago. Looking over the Ivy
codebase, there appear to be many opportunities for modernization using
Java 8 features (new APIs, interface default methods, etc.). Does anyone
object to, or have other thoughts on this upgrade?
Matt
Looks like I got it sorted by passing a path reference to Antunit and
executing typedef there.
Matt
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, 12:07 PM Matt Benson wrote:
> I am working on a new antlib (discussed a couple of years ago on list),
> and trying to figure out how to get antunit to run tests using
I am working on a new antlib (discussed a couple of years ago on list), and
trying to figure out how to get antunit to run tests using Ivy's created
classpath.test from the common build framework. I have tried combinations
of the (hidden) classloader task with antunit references, etc., so far to
Thanks, Stefan! Sounds like a good plan.
Matt
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 9:52 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2020-03-05, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > What is our current protocol for creating a new Antlib?
>
> Do we have one? :-)
>
> > I have written some types for working wi
Hello all,
What is our current protocol for creating a new Antlib? I have written some
types for working with Amazon S3 objects as Ant resources and think they
could be generally useful to the community.
Matt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 8:25 AM Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2018-04-11, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 11:03 AM Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >> We did have one big "cleanup" commit which has bee
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 11:03 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2018-04-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> > I don't mean to appear authoritative but I feel that these mass,
> > never-ending changes to various projects under the Ant umbrella,
> > related to formatting, coding style,
By and large I approve of these changes, but I felt compelled to express
the opinion that I do not believe adding else after if/continue does
anything to simplify the code. IMO it does the opposite.
Matt
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 1:15 AM wrote:
> Repository: ant
> Updated
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2017-04-19, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > I had forgotten about this. When testing my other changes I noted that no
> > InputStream was returned here, due to the requested entry name including
&g
Hi Stefan,
I had forgotten about this. When testing my other changes I noted that no
InputStream was returned here, due to the requested entry name including
the leading slash from the jar resource URL; the jar entries encountered
during testing, at least, lacked the leading slash. Due to this
Thanks for taking the time to look them over!
Matt
On Apr 18, 2017 2:25 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2017-04-14, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On 2017-04-13, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> >> Sorry for the giant pile of changes. Tests pass
Sorry for the giant pile of changes. Tests pass for me; does anyone object
to my merging these to master?
Matt
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:16 AM, wrote:
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/blob/b7d1e9bd/
> src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java
>
On Apr 27, 2014 10:03 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote about migrating to git :
- Ant
- Ivy
- easyant
- Ivyde
- the antlibs
I am not including the sandbox in the thread intentionally.
The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is
Are you looking for compatibility with the version? I.e., this task will
work on versions = n? A commonly taken approach there is to use the
presence of some particular class introduced in the target version, rather
than fiddling with version numbers per se.
HTH,
Matt
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at
from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
On Dec 9, 2013, at 14:23, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you looking for compatibility with the version? I.e., this task will
work on versions = n? A commonly taken approach there is to use the
presence of some particular class
if there were ways to deal with this going
forward.
André-John
Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
On Dec 9, 2013, at 15:56, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Main.getAntVersion() is your friend.
Matt
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andre-John Mas andrejohn
The easiest way would be to set up an open source project--even a github
project would be fine--and announce to the list that you would like it
included in the list at [1]. Thanks for your interest!
Matt
[1] https://ant.apache.org/projects.html
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Dennis Lang
On Oct 31, 2013 7:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
it looks as if we needed to d something about Antlibs.
Looking at the commit activities it is pretty clear none of them has a
developer community - some of them have an occasional single committer.
In general this
On Sep 12, 2013 2:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-09-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2013-09-11, Matt Benson wrote:
Last release was 1.9.2. https://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html says
1.9.3. What's going on here?
I merged the jar/signjar doc changes from trunk
Thanks for the update, Stefan!
Matt
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-09-05, Matt Benson wrote:
So for a long time (starting after I had made a bunch of Java 5
upgrades--at least I think they were upgrades) Ant builds were failing in
Gump
So for a long time (starting after I had made a bunch of Java 5
upgrades--at least I think they were upgrades) Ant builds were failing in
Gump. I haven't seen those notices for quite some time now, so are they
cleared up or simply turned off?
Matt
Actually the right way is to submit a report through Ivy's issue tracker.
Thanks,
Matt
On Aug 27, 2013 8:35 PM, Jerry Maloney gpjerrymalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I was doing some work on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1436 and I think I found some
unit tests that are broken due to
Sounds like a good idea. Thanks Stefan!
Matt
On Jul 5, 2013 9:36 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
as you most probably know Oracle's javadoc tool prior to Java 7u25
creates javadocs with a frame injection vulnerability - see
CVE-2013-1571, VU#225657 for details.
The
I don't think I've affected any APIs as yet. This would be acceptable.
Matt
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
On 2013-01-31, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
Obviously I've not been very
Hi Antoine,
I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase
some months back. At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump
which I wasn't able to understand. It might be nice to figure this out and
finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0.
br,
Matt
On Wed, Jan
Some years ago Stefan Bodewig and Jan Materne worked on this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/javafront/
YMMV
Matt
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jeffrey E Care ca...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Anders Rundgren anders.rundg...@telia.com wrote on 09/20/2012 09:27:10
AM:
I guess I knew
, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] only I had intended to support regex matching.
Can't propertyset's selection logic be reused? --DD
PS: Didn't look at the patch, so maybe it is.
-
To unsubscribe
Hi,
FWIW, I approve generally of this feature and was soon going to start
working on something similar, only I had intended to support regex
matching. I'm not quite sure when I will be able to get back to work
on Ant, but I need the feature so rest assured it will get in there at
some point.
Any idea (Stefan?) how or why ${ant.home} shows up in the middle of
the messages for the tests in
src/tests/antunit/types/resources/archives-test.xml ?
Matt
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Gump Integration Build
bode...@apache.org wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request,
Comments:
- ArgumentProcessor#readArgument() should return a negative number for
unsupported args, otherwise a separate boolean #supports(arg) method
and a declared IllegalArgumentException from #readArgument()
- Prefer e.g. Appendable to StringBuffer in
ArgumentProcessor#printUsage() signature,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Nicolas Lalevée
nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
Le 29 août 2012 à 16:41, Matt Benson a écrit :
Comments:
- ArgumentProcessor#readArgument() should return a negative number for
unsupported args, otherwise a separate boolean #supports(arg) method
Looks like one problem here is that ${ant.home} isn't set during the
tests' run. :/
Matt
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Gump Integration Build
bode...@apache.org wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit
Hi Peter,
So does that mean you would be opposed to removing these deprecated items?
Matt
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Peter Reilly
peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem is the there are a lot
of tasks out there in the wild that have not
been compiled in a very long time.
Hi gang,
There are lots of methods in Ant's source that have been deprecated
since e.g. v1.6. Does anyone object to removing deprecated methods
for Ant 1.9?
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
Can't this be done more cleanly by internally wrapping all if/unless
to a Condition instance?
Matt
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hibou
Date: Mon Jul 30 21:13:02 2012
New Revision: 1367306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1367306view=rev
Log:
Allow
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
WRT merging to the branch we basically have two options: (1) merge when
we commit to trunk or (2) merge when we know we want to create another
1.8.x release.
I'm leaning towards (2) since I personally don't
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Jarek Czekalski
jarekc...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi all
When I was scripting in ant, I could write
for (f: fs)
where fs is a FileSet. But after switching to ant tasks in java, it is no
longer available. I get a compile error:
foreach not applicable to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-02-13, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I spent some time starting to implement a very simple (only a few
tasks) new version of Ant that started from Java 7. Personal issues
have taken me out of the game for a while, but
Hi, Jeff. It does look like it would be nice for FileResource's (File)
constructors to set basedir. I'm looking into this.
Matt
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jeffrey E Care ca...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I was trying to track down some strange behavior in one of our custom
resource collections
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Tushar Kapila tgkp...@gmail.com wrote:
I got java 1.4 from Oracle/ old sun java site for windows and got it
running for a test app.
Can you share the command to get the latest ant code?
I tried
svn co https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ant/core/trunk ant
Ant has historically catered to the lowest common denominator. I
agree that that level has progressed to at least Java 5, but all
things considered I don't think we'd gain that much from a bump all
the way up to 6.
Matt
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jess Holle je...@ptc.com wrote:
At least.
Removing my figurative hat! The bit of time I had spent looking at
this didn't bear fruit; can't believe it was this simple. Thanks
Stefan!
Matt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:08 AM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Wed Jul 27 14:08:00 2011
New Revision: 1151473
URL:
Hi, Jeff! Seems like it's been awhile. :)
Off the top of my head the only thing that occurs to me are
ant/antcall/subant: the tasks that create a new project. :/
Matt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Jeffrey E Care ca...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I have a situation where I'm retrofitting some
]
From:Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
To:Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Date:07/27/2011 02:48 PM
Subject:Re: Limit PropertyHelper delegates to a certain scope?
--
Hi, Jeff! Seems like it's been awhile. :)
Off the top
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/16/2011 08:59 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
xor(true, false) == true
xor(true, false, true) == false
xor(true, false, true, false) == false
Is this correct?
Follows the usual semantics; cf.:
http://en.wikipedia.org
Currently each nested condition is xor'd against the cumulative result, thus:
xor(true, false) == true
xor(true, false, true) == false
xor(true, false, true, false) == false
Is this correct? It would seem that semantically an xor over multiple
nested conditions should mean that exactly one
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-07-17, Matt Benson wrote:
Currently each nested condition is xor'd against the cumulative result, thus:
xor(true, false) == true
xor(true, false, true) == false
xor(true, false, true, false) == false
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
Date: Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:16 PM
Subject: Reminder: TAC Assistance to ApacheCon NA 2011 closes July 8th
To: p...@apache.org
PMCs, please re-post this reminder to your user and dev lists and anywhere
else you see
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Michael Nellis mrnel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Jesse Glick jesse.glick at oracle.com writes:
On 06/20/2011 09:40 AM, Michael Nellis wrote:
I am investigating how to determine whether an Ant plugin,
built with Ant 1.8.1, will work with Ant 1.8.2.
Do you mean an
2011/6/16 Grüner Heinrich gruener.heinr...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
I've written a couple of own tasks for which I want to generate
help files via javadoc.
This documentation should look like the original ant documentation.
Can anyone provide a javadoc set up or doclet?
.
Matt
Thanks,
Siddhartha
On 15 June 2011 23:48, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Siddhartha Purkayastha
kpsiddha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All -
I spent some more time on this and have enhanced the POC to include the
following (in addition
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Siddhartha Purkayastha
kpsiddha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All -
I spent some more time on this and have enhanced the POC to include the
following (in addition to moving to a listener based model as suggested by
Nicolas):
(a) Added Property Watchpoints: You
Hi Ivy devs,
You may have noticed over the past several days that I have
committed some m2-related fixes, specifically:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1299
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1301
Both of these issues related to overriding parent properties that
specified
What was the reason for restricting the Ivy builds to this slave?
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
;) Me learning why builds are restricted to Ubuntu slaves; seemingly
they're the ones that are properly configured!
Matt
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-tests/49/changes
Changes:
[mbenson]
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is
now accepting applications for ApacheCon North America 2011, 7-11 November
in Vancouver BC, Canada.
The TAC is seeking individuals from the Apache community at-large --users,
developers, educators, students, Committers,
Why do we only do a 'clean jar'? Shouldn't we be running unit tests
at least? Isn't that kind of the point of CI? Perhaps 'clean
coverage-report'?
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
FYI I experimented with running these targets; build completed
successfully in 3.x minutes. I'm not going to revert my change unless
someone presents a good reason to do so.
Matt
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we only do a 'clean jar
2011/4/29 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Le 28 avr. 2011 à 21:39, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit :
Le 28 avr. 2011 à 00:39, Matt Benson a écrit :
2011/4/27 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
I could only reproduce the apply-test failing locally (on a mac).
The following
2011/4/27 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
I could only reproduce the apply-test failing locally (on a mac).
The following command line got me more info about what's happening:
ant -lib lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.1.jar antunit-report
-Dantunit.testcase=taskdefs/exec/apply-test.xml
On Jan 25, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-01-25, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Added:
ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/src/main/org/apache/ant/antunit/ResourceExists.java
(with props)
This is a plain ant condition with no dependency on AntUnit that might
be useful in core
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I
don't want to enforce anything, just share the work I have done. It is still
up to debate and can still be
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:35 AM, hi...@apache.org wrote:
+msg.append( depends of: );
That doesn't sound correct somehow. depends on ? dependent of/on ?
Could native speakers chime in please? Thanks, --DD
I
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
2010/11/9 Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org:
Note: I'll commit the unit test and doc I have wrote about this task. I
don't want to enforce anything, just share the work I have done. It is still
up to debate and can still be
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
the people behind Bushel[1] want to donate their code to Ivy[2] and
before I can start the formal IP clearance process we can and should
vote whether we want to accept the donation at all.
So, do we want to accept the Bushel
On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I will be attending ApacheCon US in Atlanta. Anyone else from the Ant
community coming too ?
I am hoping my employer will agree to send me, but I was a little late getting
them the specifics, so at this point I don't yet have
On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 08/18/2010 10:14 AM, kwut...@web.de wrote:
Why doesn't Ant just default to false and just omit warning me about this
for every Ant build?
That would be an incompatible change. Some old build scripts may be
intentionally compiling
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
On 08/18/2010 12:31 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
require those running such ancient buildfiles
Unfortunately they need not be so ancient. I have come across more than one
build.xml from an actively developed project which just assumed
On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:12 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
On Friday 16 July 2010 18:07:57 Matt Benson wrote:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Hi,
I did some other experiment with the groovy frontend to ant
recently. And I
would like to be able to make a groovy build file import
On Jul 16, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Hi,
I did some other experiment with the groovy frontend to ant
recently. And I
would like to be able to make a groovy build file import an xml
build file
and vice versa.
As far as I can tell, in order to do this, a simple change would
Like org.apache.tools.ant.Dynamic*NS?
-Matt
On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Danny Yates wrote:
Hi guys,
Me again!
I have some more functionality that I'm interested in, but I fear it may be
quite specific to my requirements, so I thought I'd run it past you all
before getting to work on
a custom
ProjectHelper that instantiated a particular Target subclass. One of our
committers, Alexey Solofnenko, was once working on a parallel executor, but I
don't know whether he ever completed it.
-Matt
Many thanks,
Danny.
On 24 June 2010 20:58, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
Ant supplies several tasks that require commercial software in order to run.
This is a problem because the Ant developers do not typically have access to
the commercial products required to test, maintain, and enhance the tasks. It
also
On 6/15/10, Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
On Monday 14 June 2010 20:01:08 Matt Benson wrote:
Hi, Nicolas:
[SNIP]
I looked into the code, it seems
org.apache.tools.ant.types.resources.Restrict is the culprit. It uses
BaseResourceCollectionWrapper which loads
Hi, Nicolas:
[SNIP]
I looked into the code, it seems
org.apache.tools.ant.types.resources.Restrict is the culprit. It uses
BaseResourceCollectionWrapper which loads the entire underlying resource
collection.
I searched for the use of BaseResourceCollectionWrapper in Ant and I think
that
I'm not sure what filelist has that you need to begin with...
sequence? You might be better off creating a resource type that
decorates another resource to add the attributes you need, i.e. adding
'scope' to some file-based resource. Then you could create those
directly, or implement a resource
Antoine: I'm not sure about this, but it may be that the
maven-metadata shows that 1.8.1 is the only version managed through
the Apache Nexus install, but when 1.8.1 propagates out to maven
central, the earlier versions as well as 1.8.1 will be represented in
that metadata.
-Matt
On 5/24/10,
--hence my declaration of being less than sure. You are correct. I
have no idea then! :)
-Matt
On 5/24/10, Antoine Levy-Lambert anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Matt,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:58:06 -0500
Von: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
An: Ant
On May 13, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
Brian Fox on the repository list has advised me to upload the ant
artefacts to the maven repository using nexus. [1]
I have entered a sub-task of INFRA-1996 Track projects that want
to use the Nexus repository infrastructure
I'm not sure. We probably need to do a little more testing but I'm on
OSX right now and don't have any Win7 system at my disposal. Later
today I can verify what was returned on XP for new
File(abc).equals(new File(ABC)) .
On 4/25/10, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-04-23, Matt
On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-22, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-04-21, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
So perhaps the check for windows (and special handling) is failing
I'll try to fix it.
There is no Windows specific code,
On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
currently extension-point and import don't play together like they are
supposed to. You can't extend an imported extension point with a
target
from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Attached to
Thanks for conducting the vote, Bruce. The task has been added.
-Matt
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I lost my email server for a few days, so I can only now close the
vote and post the results. I believe that between my returned email
feed and the record of posts on
Martijn,
augment can change properties that are coded as attributes, but
only interacts with nested elements by adding new children to a given
reference. The task as it stands is extremely, extremely simple. Any
restrictions we care to impose would complicate it immensely--I would
again urge
Good catch; I was afraid there might be similar issues lurking
there. ;)
-Matt
On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:25 AM, bode...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bodewig
Date: Mon Apr 12 10:25:46 2010
New Revision: 933177
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933177view=rev
Log:
remove costly indexOf - see
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-09, mben...@apache.org wrote:
Address indexOf inefficiency in PropertyHelper embedded
skip-double-dollar propertyexpander implementation.
Maybe we should also modify the code in DEFAULT_EXPANDER since it will
call indexOf
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
I really like the idea of being able to augment previously declared
reference. There is many uses cases where it can be useful.
For example, if ant can provides such feature it would simplify a
lot the
job in
I have now tested the RC and can offer my +1.
-Matt
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Jon Schneider wrote:
Just a reminder on this vote... Any other binding voters other than
Maarten
care to offer an up or down vote ;) ?
Thanks,
Jon
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Maarten Coene
changes in the way we handle references, but
would seem doable.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-02-25, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to direct the Ant developers' attention to https://
issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48798
1 - 100 of 1052 matches
Mail list logo