No objections? :p
Le 29 avr. 2013 20:59, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Here is the original thread from easyant-dev ML during apache incubation :
http://markmail.org/thread/uv2xkj63rkdh2thh
Le 29 avr. 2013 20:53, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com
a
Neither from me.
My objections were for ASF plugins not for outside ASF ;)
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 10:06
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: Evaluating Bintray as a distribution platform for
We currently have our own repostory (repository.easyant.org) hosted on
a private server. I would prefer to switch to a more reliable
repository like bintray. No need to worry about backup, disaster
recovery. We could just focus on content.
I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A
We currently have our own repostory (repository.easyant.org) hosted
on
a private server. I would prefer to switch to a more reliable
repository like bintray. No need to worry about backup, disaster
recovery. We could just focus on content.
I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF
I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A (Nexus based)
repository is at https://repository.apache.org/
Ant + Ivy are available at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/
I would also prefer this but will ASF authorize non apache project (read
plugins with
Here is the original thread from easyant-dev ML during apache incubation :
http://markmail.org/thread/uv2xkj63rkdh2thh
Le 29 avr. 2013 20:53, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com
a écrit :
I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A (Nexus based)
repository is at