Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I submitted a bug 18504 about JUnitReport being broken on JDK 1.4.1. It
was closed with WONTFIX status, which I think happened partially due to
Bugzilla mysteriously trimming half of my report text (I am not very
experienced with Bugzilla, so who knows). Anyway, the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I did find an issue that is preventing some packages from loading into
Oracle. I have attached a diff -u that fixes it (one line, pretty self
explanatory). Please commit it.
-Rob A
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:43 PM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
conor 2003/04/03 20:19:50
Modified:docs index.html page.css
xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm
Log:
KHTML does not right align table cells
Revision ChangesPath
1.275 +1 -1 ant/docs/index.html
Index: index.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16268.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18664.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4 Apr 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More CSS - less tables
No question, it looks - umh - ugly on Netscape 4, don't know how much
of a concern that has to be for us, though[1].
It works (the menu comes at the top, the content below) for links and
lynx (text-only browsers that are used by
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 03:53 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
No question, it looks - umh - ugly on Netscape 4, don't know how much
of a concern that has to be for us, though[1].
Probably not much of a concern. I've tested with a few browsers
Mozilla 1.2/1.3 on Linux
Konqueror on Linux
IE6 on Windows
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any ideas on the differences between using taskdef under project
or under a target?
Several, and they vary with the Ant version in use.
With Ant 1.5.x, the main difference is that taskdefs defined at the
project level will get
Hi Conor and Stefan!
No question, it looks - umh - ugly on Netscape 4, don't
know how much
of a concern that has to be for us, though[1].
Probably not much of a concern. I've tested with a few browsers
Mozilla 1.2/1.3 on Linux
Konqueror on Linux
Whew, and it looks much nicer as the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Attached is the updated sql documentation that I promised.
Didn't make it to the list, sorry.
Stefan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I hate it when that happens. How about now?
-Rob A
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: updated sql documentation
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I fixed the JDepend task, I made it depend on JDK 1.2 - which is
fine as JDepend has the same dependency.
I'll shortly commit the JUnit Report patches and those contain workarounds
for the famous StringBuffer#toString memory leak[1] in JDK 1.4.1.
Unfortunately the workaround is to use
bodewig 2003/04/04 00:36:22
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit
XMLJUnitResultFormatter.java
XMLResultAggregator.java XalanExecutor.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util DOMElementWriter.java
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How about now?
Got it.
Stefan
bodewig 2003/04/04 00:50:08
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks sql.html
Log:
Sync docs with new functionality.
Submitted by: Rob Anderson Anderson dot Rob at vectorscm dot com
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +8 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/sql.html
Index:
bodewig 2003/04/04 01:08:52
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javacc
JJTree.java JavaCC.java
Log:
Make javacc and jjtree work with JavaCC version 3.x.
PR: 18664
Submitted by: Jene Jasper jjasper
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12511.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18664.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
one line, pretty self explanatory
self explaining? Yes.
I'm just not sure whether we want to do that unconditionally.
Stefan
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be useful if I add an updated patch.txt to bug 18602 for
JavaCC.java and JJTree.java after the changes are available in a
nightly build ??
Maybe, but I don't think that merging them will be a big deal anyway.
Stefan
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 06:28 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
IIUC we don't have a 1.1 compatibility requirement for CVS HEAD any
longer, so that is fine.
This is the case - I just need to write up an email about it which I'll try to
do tonight.
Conor
--
Conor MacNeill
Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/
Stefan,
Thanks for those details.
Erik
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 01:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any ideas on the differences between using taskdef under project
or under a target?
Several, and they vary with the Ant version in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
BTW, it looks nice in Safari as well, which probably makes up a
considerable part of the Unknowns in
http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/daily.html#User+Agents+Stats
Stefan
bodewig 2003/04/04 05:02:40
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce
P4Fstat.java
Log:
Remove stray CRs
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +213 -212
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce/P4Fstat.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18708.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
conor 2003/04/04 05:50:54
ant/src/etc/testcases/core/containersrc/test - New directory
bodewig 2003/04/04 05:51:12
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant RuntimeConfigurable.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/listener MailLogger.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntStructure.java
Concat.java FixCRLF.java
conor 2003/04/04 05:53:17
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
New task container test, which fails. This doesn't fail as badly
under 1.5.x but nevertheless is not functional
Revision ChangesPath
1.359 +1 -0 ant/build.xml
Index: build.xml
conor 2003/04/04 05:53:18
Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant TaskContainerTest.java
Log:
New task container test, which fails. This doesn't fail as badly
under 1.5.x but nevertheless is not functional
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +13 -0
conor 2003/04/04 05:53:18
Added: src/etc/testcases/core/containersrc/test SpecialSeq.java
Log:
New task container test, which fails. This doesn't fail as badly
under 1.5.x but nevertheless is not functional
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
Probably because Stefan is (with you!) the most active committer on Ant ;-)
Thank you both for your fantastic work. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RESULT] Ant 1.6 will require
Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 03/04/2003 8.17:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I had it in jars I could ship it automatically with the jar that
has the task that generated index.xml, so I can easily do something
like:
xslt in=index.xml out=index.html
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's funny that Stefan, who only voted +0, is the first to make a
change that requires JDK 1.2 :-)
I couldn't find a workaround, that's all (yes, I've seen that smiley).
Having said that, I could have left all toStrings as they were
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I mean is not to change the passing of a File object. I mean
that we can *wrap* an URL in a File. So we pass a File, and use an
URL, getting a Virtual File System.
How so - put the URI into the name and abuse File as a
OK, me too I wish Ant was using more URLs instead of files... Using my
little resource: custom URL protocol, I could then easily reference any
resource in $ANT_HOME/lib. Right now though, you can turn around the current
limitations but first doing a get of the URL you want (and with resource:
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. Look at the JDK 1.4 version,
Ahh, far to modern for Ant.
Because a URI can be navigated, and it's possible to make a File
from a URI.
Not always.
org.apache.tools.vfs.File extends java.io.File
But this version
Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 04/04/2003 17.55:
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Because a URI can be navigated, and it's possible to make a File
from a URI.
Not always.
Agreed, not always with the same features. Listing files in a http URL
dir is not usually
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On a related subject, one problem I have found is that there
is no portable way right now in ANT to obtain the URL of a file:
Currently we would do something like:
property name=fileloc location=${myfile}/
property name=fileurl value=file://${fileloc}/
but the number of //s is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18402.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
org.apache.tools.vfs.File extends java.io.File
But this version cannot be the argument for the (existing) setters.
For this to work, IntrospectionHelper will need to take special care
(i.e. if setXYZ(java.io.File) is found, actually pass it an instance
of
Just checking before I re-invent the wheel - is anyone else aware of an
Ant task for compiling XSL stylesheets into translets?
Kyle A.
Workspace needs to be a name as defined by PVCS, not a filesystem
location. For example /@/Public/Dev. PVCS will use the workfile
location set for the workspace for the files.
This should probably go to the ant-users list, though.
s
-Original Message-
From: Pothula,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18722.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
53 matches
Mail list logo
