Everyone is entitled to your opinion, and everyone else is
entitled to
their own, wrong opinion. Right, Dominique? ;^)
Just to be contrarian (but not really), the [EMAIL PROTECTED] notation
looks weird to
me! @{x} is familiar enough, although I can't say why at
the moment --
oh,
From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Gus Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My (non-committer) oppion coincides with Stefan here, with a slight
preference for @{x}
because it looks like put the substitution AT this location when I
read it to myself.
Actually if
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 16:13, Ken Gentle wrote:
Just to be contrarian (but not really), the [EMAIL PROTECTED] notation
looks weird to
me! @{x} is familiar enough, although I can't say why at the moment --
oh, yeah, doesn't Perl have a similar construct?
If not today then some day.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@{x} is familiar enough, although I can't say why at the moment
It's a grid bug (or a xorn, dunno without colors) between a moat and a
fountain with an adventurer/human/elf next to it.
8-)
Stefan
LOL!
This got the office rolling on the floor.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
substitution s
On Wed, 19 Nov
If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
properties
[ ] as $(x) to close to A
[ ] as @x
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
properties
[ ] as $(x) to close to A
[ ] as @x
If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
properties
[ ] as $(x) to close to A
[ ] as @x
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
substitutions
[ ] as $(x)
[ ] as @{x}
either one works for me - as well as [EMAIL
From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties)
[ ] as $(x)
[ ] as @x
[ ] as ${attribute:x}
[ ] as @{x}
[X] some thing
I know that Canoo WebTest uses %{x} as its own variable substitution.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
substitutions
OK, how do we want to implement macrodef attributes:
[ ] as textual substitution
[X] as real Ant properties
Jan
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, how do we want to implement macrodef attributes:
[X] as textual substitution
[ ] as real Ant properties
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
13 matches
Mail list logo
