AW: VOTE Retire IvyDE - RESULT

The vote about archiving IvyDE starts on 05.December 2016 [1]. The result is: * binding votes +1: (Jan), (Nicolas), Jean-Louis, Dominique, 0: Stefan -1: -- asks for cancelling: Nicolas [3], Jan [4] * non binding votes +1: -- 0: -- -1: Gintas [2] I interpret the asks for

Re: IvyDE status (Was: VOTE Retire IvyDE)

A short report on status (and more detailed answers to Nicholas questions): - the doc builds correctly once I clone ant-xooki repository on Github into doc/xooki; - the style clone on Github is empty; I did "wget -np -nd -r

AW: VOTE Retire IvyDE

> Very well, how does one revive a project? > > Gintas If you ask for the process of reactivating it after archiving, that's documented at http://ant.apache.org/processes.html. But ATM it is still alive - but sleeping. ;-) Jan

Re: IvyDE status (Was: VOTE Retire IvyDE)

AFAICS, Subversion is invoked in one of the targets connected to packaging of a release, and I'm looking into an equivalent for Git. What is more interesting is getting all Eclipse components. Current process depends on finding a "good" mirror, and I'm tempted to investigate a possibility to use

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

Very well, how does one revive a project? Gintas 2016-12-08 21:01 GMT+01:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) : > > Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of > > Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ? > > > > Nicolas > > > Yes, I agree. >

AW: VOTE Retire IvyDE

> Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of > Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ? > > Nicolas Yes, I agree. The discussion and the vote about retiring IvyDE had brought much more activity than the months before (as I recognized). But I

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ? Nicolas > Le 5 déc. 2016 à 08:04, Jan Matèrne (jhm) a écrit : > > I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > The last release was in 11/2013.

IvyDE status (Was: VOTE Retire IvyDE)

I am forking the thread to not pollute the vote. > Le 7 déc. 2016 à 19:56, Gintautas Grigelionis a > écrit : > > I decided to take a quick look at the build process and it's not broken per > se, rather it's hardcoded to Eclipse SDK 3.7.1 foe Win32. You confirm the doc

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

I decided to take a quick look at the build process and it's not broken per se, rather it's hardcoded to Eclipse SDK 3.7.1 foe Win32. I would like to make the process to adapt to the build platform. Any suggestions for a reasonable Eclipse baseline? Should we target Java 8, that would be 4.5 (or

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

> Le 7 déc. 2016 à 12:34, Gintautas Grigelionis a > écrit : > > I would prefer an agreement on status. IvyDE is dependent on Ivy and > ideally their release cycles should be synced. > Since there seem to be some changes brewing in Ivy, IvyDE could be used as > a test

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

I would prefer an agreement on status. IvyDE is dependent on Ivy and ideally their release cycles should be synced. Since there seem to be some changes brewing in Ivy, IvyDE could be used as a test case. Gintas 2016-12-07 11:37 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2016-12-07,

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

On 2016-12-07, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Somebody mentioned that IvyDE build process is broken and I would like to > look into that if it could help to prevent retirement. That would be wonderful, regardless of whether it prevents retirement. Stefan

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

Somebody mentioned that IvyDE build process is broken and I would like to look into that if it could help to prevent retirement. Gintas 2016-12-07 10:00 GMT+01:00 Dominique Devienne : > +1 > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < >

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

+1 On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart < jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Le 6 déc. 2016 6:51 PM, "Nicolas Lalevée" a > écrit : > > > +1 > > > > Nicolas > > > > > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > >

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

+1 Le 6 déc. 2016 6:51 PM, "Nicolas Lalevée" a écrit : > +1 > > Nicolas > > > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > > On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > > > >> I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > > > +0 > > > > The

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

+1 Nicolas > Le 6 déc. 2016 à 17:22, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > >> I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. > > +0 > > The discussion in the "Ivy" thread makes me think we'd probably want to > update it with new Ivy releases, even if

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

On 2016-12-05, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. +0 The discussion in the "Ivy" thread makes me think we'd probably want to update it with new Ivy releases, even if nothing else changes in between. Stefan

VOTE Retire IvyDE

I start a vote for retiring IvyDE. The last release was in 11/2013. The last 'real' code activity was in 08/2014. It seems that we havent the community, committers and PMC to hold this subproject. The general procedure is described in http://ant.apache.org/processes.html. I start