On Tuesday 28 March 2006 00:21, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't think your suggestion is quite enough, as the lifetime
of drivers is tied to the pool. But if we add a pool cleanup
that resets drivers to NULL, it should be fine AFAICS.
I'll put that in
Apache httpd's htdbm's often-incorrect usage statement could use
something like this patch:
-fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (SDBM|GDBM|DB|default).\n);
+fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (%s).\n,
+apr_dbm_typestring_get(pool));
Or should applications that need to do
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Apache httpd's htdbm's often-incorrect usage statement could use
something like this patch:
-fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (SDBM|GDBM|DB|default).\n);
+fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (%s).\n,
+apr_dbm_typestring_get(pool));
Or should
I was about to say 'wrong list?' - but yes. Can we add a second arg to let
the user pick |, , or some other list delim? Is there something we can
do to indicate which one -is- the default?
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Apache httpd's htdbm's often-incorrect usage statement could use
something like
On 3/31/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was about to say 'wrong list?' - but yes. Can we add a second arg to let
the user pick |, , or some other list delim?
sure
Is there something
we can
do to indicate which
On 3/31/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Apache httpd's htdbm's often-incorrect usage statement could use
something like this patch:
-fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (SDBM|GDBM|DB|default).\n);
+fprintf(stderr,-T DBM Type (%s).\n,
+
On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Fri Mar 31 04:09:39 2006
New Revision: 390399
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390399view=rev
Log:
apr_dbd_get_name driver patches from Bojan Smojver
This kind of stuff should really get a CHANGES entry,
I've exported the same build with these exported command-line makefiles
that are usable on either VS5/6 or later flavors of Studio.
I'm wondering if I should upload them as apr*-0.9.11.zip or give these
a designation such as apr*-0.9.11-win32-src.zip?
Also wondering, I have the same for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/31/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was about to say 'wrong list?' - but yes. Can we add a second arg to let
the user pick |, , or some other list delim?
sure
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:58:19PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I've exported the same build with these exported command-line makefiles
that are usable on either VS5/6 or later flavors of Studio.
I'm wondering if I should upload them as apr*-0.9.11.zip or give these
a designation such
Would whoever's contributed to this conundrum please comment why...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd-2.x]$ ./configure --with-apr=srclib/apr
--with-apr-util=srclib/apr-util --with-mpm=prefork --with-shared-mods=all
[...]
Configuring Apache Portable Runtime library ...
checking for APR... configure:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:31:14PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Would whoever's contributed to this conundrum please comment why...
that hasn't ever worked afaict, see r356960 in apr trunk :)
The _find macros that are in the respective trunks attempt to fix some
of this problem, but
Hi,
Specifying LIBS/LDFLAGS is not working with configure. For example,
$ LDFLAGS='-R/usr/sfw' ./configure --with-apr=../apr \
--with-expat=/usr/sfw
will not have the -R flag in the Makefile.
Attached patch fix this. I wonder this is a reason for not having
LIBS/LDFLAGS in purpose as this
I started mucking around with mod_dbd, and noticed a couple of typos
with dbd.m4, and a small update to INSTALL.MySQL.
-Peter
--- build/dbd.m4 2005-05-05 12:24:29.0 -0700
+++ ../apr-util-1.2.6_new/build/dbd.m4 2006-03-31 06:48:03.0 -0800
@@ -81,27 +81,27 @@
if test
Hi,
Attached patch allows to build apr-util with system provided libexpat on
OpenSolaris.
On the machine, there is a expat.h and libexpat.so.* in /usr/sfw/include
and /usr/sfw/lib. But there is no .a or .la file.
It should not be required to have a .la file, not to mention a .a file.
.a
When did we drift back to this naming convention?
I thought we were trying to move twords lib_object_subobject_verb?
E.g. apr_dbd_name_get?
It's really aggrivating to use an api that's pulling in both directions
at once :(
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Fri Mar 31 16:28:12
16 matches
Mail list logo
