When did we drift back to this naming convention?
I thought we were trying to move twords lib_object_subobject_verb?
E.g. apr_dbd_name_get?
It's really aggrivating to use an api that's pulling in both directions
at once :(
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Fri Mar 31 16:28:12 2006
New Revision: 390549
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390549&view=rev
Log:
Commit the b**** API for get_name, dammit!
Modified:
apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apr_dbd.h
Modified: apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apr_dbd.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apr_dbd.h?rev=390549&r1=390548&r2=390549&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apr_dbd.h (original)
+++ apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apr_dbd.h Fri Mar 31 16:28:12 2006
@@ -223,6 +223,17 @@
APU_DECLARE(const char*) apr_dbd_get_entry(const apr_dbd_driver_t *driver,
apr_dbd_row_t *row, int col);
+/** apr_dbd_get_name: get an entry name from a result set
+ *
+ * @param driver - the driver
+ * @param res - result set pointer
+ * @param col - entry number
+ * @return name of the entry, or NULL if col is out of bounds.
+ */
+APU_DECLARE(const char*) apr_dbd_get_name(const apr_dbd_driver_t *driver,
+ apr_dbd_results_t *res, int col);
+
+
/** apr_dbd_error: get current error message (if any)
*
* @param driver - the driver
.
