[VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.0-rc1

2012-11-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
We've fixed pretty much all know issues since beta2 (remains 2 issues tagged 1.2.0 but none are really critical if they don't make it anyway) so so I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc1. sha1: 2f187c92033b5b3f689d75375308dbf4dbac515f Git:

[VOTE SUCCESS] Release Apache Cassandra 1.1.7

2012-11-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
Including my own, I'm counting 5 binding +1's, one other +1 and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published. -- Sylvain On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:

Re: Removing 2-phase compaction question

2012-11-30 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
I'm finding myself modifying row serialization stuff in ColumnFamilySerializer, RowIndexEntry, SSTableReader/Writer, SimpleSliceReader, and others. That mostly sound about right. As said in the ticket, if we stop writing the size at the beginning of the rows, we need to have marker of the end

Re: Removing 2-phase compaction question

2012-11-30 Thread Jason Brown
Sylvain, Thanks for the feedback! You're probably right about the RIE, but as this is my first 'really deep' ticket into the bowels of c*, I'm learning the role/purpose of everything as I'm going. As for the WIP branch, I may take the community up on that :). Thanks, -Jason On Fri, Nov 30,

Secondary Index seen as empty

2012-11-30 Thread Cyril Scetbon
Hi, We got an issue here with cassandra 1.1.6 where a secondary index seems to be seen as empty. For example, If I try to see what are the first 10 values I have : cqlsh:pns_fr select mailendwnd from syndic limit 10; mailendwnd -- 2012-11-29 23:30:00+ 2012-11-29

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.0-rc1

2012-11-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: We've fixed pretty much all know issues since beta2 (remains 2 issues tagged 1.2.0 but none are really critical if they don't make it anyway) so so I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.0-rc1

2012-11-30 Thread Vijay
+1 Regards, /VJ On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: We've fixed pretty much all know issues since beta2 (remains 2 issues tagged 1.2.0 but none are really critical if they don't make it anyway) so so I propose the following artifacts for release as

Re: Secondary Index seen as empty

2012-11-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Re remote debugging, see cassandra-env.sh: # uncomment to have Cassandra JVM listen for remote debuggers/profilers on port 1414 # JVM_OPTS=$JVM_OPTS -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=1414 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Cyril Scetbon cyril.scet...@free.fr

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Jason Brown
Hi Jonathan, I'm in favor of paying off the technical debt, as well, and I wonder if there is value in removing support for thrift with 2.0? We're currently in 'do as little as possible' mode with thrift, so should we aggressively cast it off and push the binary CQL protocol? Seems like a jump to

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Edward Capriolo
Good idea. Lets remove thrift, CQL3 is still beta, but I am willing to upgrade to a version that removes thrift. Then when all our clients can not connect they will be forced to get with the program. On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jonathan, I'm in

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
As attractive as it would be to clean house, I think we owe it to our users to keep Thrift around for the forseeable future rather than orphan all Thrift-using applications (which is virtually everyone) on 1.2. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jonathan,

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Jason Brown
My hope is that after 1.2 (i.e. by the time we're 2.0'ing), the binary CQL protocol is out of beta :). On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote: Good idea. Lets remove thrift, CQL3 is still beta, but I am willing to upgrade to a version that removes thrift.

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Vijay
+1 Regards, /VJ On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: The more I think about it, the more I think we should call 1.2-next, 2.0. I'd like to spend some time paying off our technical debt: - replace supercolumns with composites (CASSANDRA-3237) -

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Bill de hÓra
I'm not thrilled with Thrift, but I'd like to see and hear more real world use of CQL first (Avro all the things is not that long ago). That said, a major rev /could/ do this - not start the thrift server by default. It's then a hoop jump to enable it via nodetool/yaml, and signals to the

Re: 2.0

2012-11-30 Thread Ray Slakinski
I agree, I don't think its a great idea to drop thrift until the back end tools are 100% compatible and have some level of agreement from the major users of Cassandra. Paying off technical dept though I'm all for, and I think its key to the long term success of the application. Right now