Re: Many failing unit tests, prior to any changes. NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port

OK, I've created a new worktree. Did not create IDEA files there. Just ran 'ant', and then 'ant test', in a terminal window. There, I'm not getting the 'java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port' errors, and only about 13 tests fail, some of them "crashing": untitled text 9:1348: [junit] Testcase:

Re: Bug in paging reads and limit reads (short reads!)

Thanks Benjamin! I am also hoping to ask couple of questions on difference in this code base between 2.0, 2.1 and 3.0. I understand 2.0 is closed from community point of view. But, we are still using in some cases, so we need to fix it internally. With my limited understanding of the code, it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.10

[Copied from 3.10 thread] Sorry all. Changing my vote to -1 per my comment: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12867?focusedCommentId=15630442=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15630442 This pattern is more common in the wild than you might

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.10

Sorry all. Changing my vote to -1 per my comment: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12867?focusedCommentId=15630442=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15630442 This pattern is more common in the wild than you might think. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at

Re: Many failing unit tests, prior to any changes. NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port

Yea, sorry. I never got that many failing tests. Perhaps it could be environment variable related. Thanks, Christopher Licata Senior Software Engineer Featureless Tech Monsters Card Rewards 718.916.8940 On 11/2/16, 10:10 AM, "BORIS MELAMED" wrote:

Re: Many failing unit tests, prior to any changes. NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port

Actually, 279 out of 296 failing tests seem to fail with this same error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port at org.apache.cassandra.OffsetAwareConfigurationLoader.loadConfig( OffsetAwareConfigurationLoader.java:52) *Boris Melamed* |Software Engineer *w:* ++972-545691126 *e:

Re: Many failing unit tests, prior to any changes. NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port

I have actually noticed the same thing when I was working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12485. Even before I made any changes to cassandra-trunk. I was seeing failing unit tests. Not sure if the TriggersSchemaTest was the exact test though. Thanks, Christopher Licata

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.10

+1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Nate McCall wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Michael Shuler > wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.10. > > > > sha1: 817ba038783212b716f6981b26c8348ffdc92f59 > > Git: > >

Re: Many failing unit tests, prior to any changes. NoSuchFieldError: rpc_port

Thank you Nate, I followed those instructions as well, and I can run/debug Cassandra without issues. It's only when I run the test suite that I get those errors. (By the way, I meant to write OS-X, not iOS, of course) -Boris On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Nate McCall

[GitHub] cassandra pull request #81: 12869 trunk

GitHub user nastra opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/81 12869 trunk You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/nastra/cassandra 12869-trunk Alternatively you can review and apply these changes

[GitHub] cassandra pull request #80: CASSANDRA-12869: Don't load mx4j beans twice

GitHub user nastra opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/80 CASSANDRA-12869: Don't load mx4j beans twice You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/nastra/cassandra 12869-3.X Alternatively you can

Re: Bug in paging reads and limit reads (short reads!)

Hi Bhaskar, Thanks for reporting that problem. It is a nice catch :-) Could you open a JIRA ticket with all the information that you provided? I will try to fix that problem. Benjamin On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Bhaskar Muppana wrote: > Hi Guys, > > We are seeing