Re: Attend Cassandra Summit 2016 for Free!

on Skype or hangout if there are specific concerns. Thanks! Patrick McFadin On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:10 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > This is better, but I don't know what the rules are about stuff like > "Cassandra Training"? Just forwarding. > >

Re: Proposal: create a mailing list for just the newly created Jira ticket notifications

I have one setup for new AND updated. Very handy to seeing activity progression. Jira has some really nice query + notification settings if you want to get more granular. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Haddad wrote: > Wow, I am embarrassed to say that I had no

Re: DataStax Client List

This has to be the most entertaining dev list in all of the ASFs On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > Well that is quite unsettling. > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Theresa Taylor < > theresa.tay...@onlinedatatech.biz> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: Cassandra on RocksDB experiment result

Dikang, First I want to thank you and everyone else at Instragram for the engineering talent you have devoted to the Cassandra project. Here's yet another great example. He's going to hate me for dragging him into this, but Vijay Parthasarathy has done some exploratory work before on integrating

Re: NGCC?

A couple years ago we tried to attach it to an ApacheCon event, but the feedback from the ASF was fairly negative on attaching events. I don't think making it a part of Apache Big Data would work. The alternative as an independent event with sponsorship will be really hard to coordinate and a

Re: NGCC 2018?

Ben, Lynn Bender had offered a space the day before Distributed Data Summit in September (http://distributeddatasummit.com/) since we are both platinum sponsors. I thought he and Nate had talked about that being a good place for NGCC since many of us will be in town already. Nate, now that I've

Re: Apache Cassandra Virtual meetings

If it works for everyone, DataStax has some resources we could put to this effort. We do large scale conferences like this all the time and have the tools to pull it off. It would be a small group of people with full duplex audio and video with the ability for 100s of people to watch in streaming.

Re: Ideas for Cassandra 2020 - Remote Meetups / Mastermind

Rahul, Don't cut yourself short. I love what you've done with Awesome Cassandra and organizing meetups. Those are really valuable contributions. For everyone else on this ML, if you don't know about Awesome Cassandra. Rahul picked it up and has been keeping it up to date.

Re: Feedback from the last Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

you, Patrick! > > > On Feb 11, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > > > Survey is closed. Thank you everyone that took time to give your > feedback. > > Here are the results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-7YTMZYLT7/ > > > > Bas

Re: Cassandra CI Status

I would love to get involved promoting those if and when a list produced. Could this be something as a Cassandra confluence page? I would be happy to volunteer some time keeping that up-to-date. Patrick On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 6:49 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > > > an entry in the progress

Feedback from the last Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Hi everyone, One action item I took from our first contributor meeting was gather feedback for the next meetings. I've created a short survey if you would like to offer feedback. I'll let it run for the week and report back on the results. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/C95B7ZP Thanks, Patrick

Re: Feedback from the last Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Just a Monday reminder on the survey link I sent. I got a few responses but could use a few more to give us some decent N. If you have < 5minutes today, I would appreciate your feedback. I'll keep it open until tomorrow and then send results. Patrick On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:21 PM Patr

Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting 2020-02-18

Hi everyone, A page has been setup for the Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting on February 18. The time in the rotation will be 10AM PST You can add your agenda items here. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-02-18+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting The Zoom link for

Re: Feedback from the last Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:28 AM Patrick McFadin wrote: > Just a Monday reminder on the survey link I sent. I got a few responses > but could use a few more to give us some decent N. If you have < 5minutes > today, I would appreciate your feedback. I'll keep it open until tomorrow >

Re: Offering some project management services

Scott and I had a talk this week and we are starting the contributor meetings on 1/22 as we talked about at NGCC. (Yeah that was back in September) Stay tuned for the details and agenda in the project confluence page. Patrick On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10,

Re: Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

And I sent this without saying when. Let me save you a click on the confluence link. January 21, 1PM PST On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:28 PM Patrick McFadin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In order to catch up on what's happening here, here's the establishing > thread: > https://l

Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Hi everyone, In order to catch up on what's happening here, here's the establishing thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aa54420a43671c00392978f2b0920bc6926ca9ba1e61a486ad39fb21%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E Key points that Scott Andreas proposed in the initial email was Motivation

Contributor Meeting summary for 2020-01-21

tating.” - Windows question: potentially a question to the user@ list if there are contributors willing to test / contribute patches for Windows. - Jeremy Hanna: Discuss changes to defaults prior to 4.0 release. - Patrick McFadin: Start discussion on dev list to settle time for next me

Re: Kubernetes Operator SIG Zoom

and myself will start that process which will live in the Cassandra cwiki for everyone to contribute. There was also consensus on having bi-weekly meetings at the same times which I will schedule. Thanks to everyone who participated! Patrick On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:25 PM Patrick McFadin wrote: >

Kubernetes Operator SIG Zoom

Hi, I have sorted out the time zones and got the initial Kubernetes Operator zoom call on the calendar. All of it is documented here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Kubernetes+Operator+SIG+Meeting Meeting 1(APAC/Western US Friendly) San Francisco: April 8, 5:00PM

Re: Sidecar meeting notes from 2020-03-10

Since there seems to be more energy building on the sidecar project, would it be helpful to do a monthly Zoom like we do with contributors. Or maybe just add that in? On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 1:13 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Where was this announced? I didnt hear anything about it (it's

Re: Sidecar meeting notes from 2020-03-10

e I > missed an email but don't see anything). > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:26 AM Patrick McFadin > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > This week, a small group of us met on Zoom on how to contribute best to > the > > sidecar project (CEP-1). DataStax is open so

Sidecar meeting notes from 2020-03-10

Hi everyone, This week, a small group of us met on Zoom on how to contribute best to the sidecar project (CEP-1). DataStax is open sourcing several components, one of which includes a management sidecar. This was open conversation about what's being released and how best to participate in CEP-1

Re: Kubernetes operator unification

T morning and evening. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:51 PM Patrick McFadin > wrote: > > > *Thanks for starting this thread Ben! Definitely agree that having a > single > > project-owned Kubernetes operator for Cassandra is preferred over a > > fragmented ecosystem. I'll echo

Re: Kubernetes operator unification

*Thanks for starting this thread Ben! Definitely agree that having a single project-owned Kubernetes operator for Cassandra is preferred over a fragmented ecosystem. I'll echo the same sentiment based on conversations that it appears the community is eager to share experiences and implementations

Re: DataStax Driver Donation to Apache Cassandra Project

It would probably be a good idea to get some outside guidance on what other projects have seen because like what Nate said, this isn't the first time. https://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects.html https://cocoon.apache.org/subprojects/ Commons has components:

Re: Kubernetes Operator SIG Zoom

...@orange.com > Casskop Product Owner > https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/casskop > > > > > On 15 Apr 2020, at 02:17, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A little late, but wanted to update post meeting. Here are the notes an

Meeting notes and recording from today's meeting

Hi everyone, Here are the notes and video recording from today's meeting: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-04-21+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting I updated the meeting details with an ICS to import into your own calendar to make it easy to schedule.

4-26-2020 update on Kubernetes Operator

*Hi everyone,Over the past two weeks, we have had 4 public meetings with a lot of great discussions. You can find the recordings and notes here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Kubernetes+Operator+SIG

2020-05-07 Cassandra Kubernetes SIG meeting follow-up

Hi everyone, A little late getting the page and recording up. You can find the recording here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-05-07+Cassandra+Kubernetes+Operator+SIG The notes for this week's meeting we're taken int he working CEP gdoc found here:

[discussion]Completing CEP-2

Hi everyone, Last week in our Cassandra Kubernetes SIG it was clear that we are coming up on the completion of the specifications for CEP-2. The path we on look something like this: - Agree to the overall specifications for a Cassandra Kubernetes Operator with as much details as possible on the

Reminder - 2020-05-19 Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Hi everyone, Reminder that tomorrow at 1PM PST we'll be having a contributor meeting. I gave Jitsi a try for the Kubernetes SIG but ran into a lot of trouble with browser compatibility and recording. I'll just stick with using Zoom to keep it working consistently.

2020-03-24 Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Hi everyone, It's easy to loose track of thing given how quickly things have changed in the past couple of weeks. I missed sending a reminder last week but we have a contributor meeting tomorrow at 11AM PST. Please post any agenda items to the cwiki page below. If you don't have edit rights,

2020-05-07 Cassandra Kubernetes Operator SIG reminder

Hi everyone, Cassandra Kubernetes Operator SIG today at 10AM PST. Just a reminder, I switched the conference link to Jitsi from Zoom. Link in the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Kubernetes+Operator+SIG Today we will be discussing CEP-2 so bring your

Re: Reminder - 2020-05-19 Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Thanks Mick! On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:51 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > I'll be there and have added "Cassandra CI Run-through, next steps, > help needed, and Q" to the agenda. > If you have questions on CI turn up and ask them. > > Mick > > > On Tue, 19 May 202

2020-05-19 Contributor Meeting notes and recording

Hi everyone, Meeting notes and recording up here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-05-19+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting Patrick

Cassandra Kubernetes SIG today

Hi everyone, Quick reminder, Cassandra Kubernetes Operator SIG at the top of the hour. I've switched back to using Zoom to avoid the issues we had with Jitsi. The link to the meeting is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Kubernetes+Operator+SIG Calendar object

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

is a bad time for the people in the APAC timezone. Can we > move it to 7 or 8AM PST in the morning to accommodate their needs ? > > ~Charles > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:37 PM Patrick McFadin > wrote: > > > > Meeting scheduled. > > > https://cwiki.apache.or

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

< jasonstack.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 04:52, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 16:48, Caleb Rackliffe > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

This is related to the discussion Jordan and I had about the contributor Zoom call. Instead of open mic for any issue, call it based on a discussion thread or threads for higher bandwidth discussion. I would be happy to schedule on for next week to specifically discuss CEP-7. I can attach the

2020-09-29 Contributor Meeting

Hi everyone, I have the meeting video and transcripts uploaded: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-09-29+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting+-+4.0+push+edition Takeaways from today's meeting - Shephards, shepherds shepherds. Quite a few places that no longer have a

Re: [DISCUSS] Next steps for Kubernetes operator SIG

I would like to propose a hybrid a hybrid of what Benedict mentioned. Let's postpone today's (Sept 24) SIG to the next week, Oct 1. Same time. I'll keep the same zoom with some modifications. Each group, CassKop and cass-operator can have time to present the following: - State your view of the

Cassandra Contributor Meeting to focus on outstanding 4.0 issues

Hi everyone, First, I want to acknowledge some of the raw conversations today in the cassandra-dev slack channel. It was probably well overdue and if not for 2020 and what a wonderful year this has been, we might have gotten there earlier. I really appreciate how everyone who participated kept

Re: Cassandra Contributor Meeting to focus on outstanding 4.0 issues

30pm > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:23 AM Patrick McFadin > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > First, I want to acknowledge some of the raw conversations today in the > > cassandra-dev slack channel. It was probably well overdue and if not for > > 2020 and

Re: Cassandra Contributor Meeting to focus on outstanding 4.0 issues

Hi Paulo, I appreciate you bringing this up because I'm sure that means plenty are thinking the same thing. Let me give you a little context and history. Last ApacheCon I proposed setting up a periodic zoom call to emulate some of the high bandwidth discussions that happen in-person. There was a

Re: [DISCUSS] Next steps for Kubernetes operator SIG

I can agree with that Ben. Franck did a good job of outlining CassKop. Somebody from the cass-operator will be posting something similar and we can keep it on the mailing list. Patrick On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:16 PM Ben Bromhead wrote: > Thanks Frank and Stefan. > > @Patrick great suggestion

Re: [DISCUSS] Next steps for Kubernetes operator SIG

No problem Franck! I will postpone this week's meeting to next week and we can continue the discussion on the ML. Patrick On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:23 AM wrote: > I can share Orange’s view of the situation, sorry it is a long story! > > We started CassKop at the end of 2018 after betting on

Cassandra Kubernetes SIG 2020-05-21 note and recording

Hi everyone, Last weeks meeting is posted here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-05-19+Cassandra+Kubernetes+Operator+SIG Highlights: This is a big task trying to get multiple operators in the wild to one closer to the project. The CEP is at a place where we need to get

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisiting Java 11's experimental status

Follow-up on the informal poll I did on twitter: https://twitter.com/patrickmcfadin/status/1282791302065557504?s=21 Offered up as data to be used as you will. 161 votes <= JDK8: 59% JDK9 or 10: 7% JDK11 or 12: 27% JDK13 or 14: 7% On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:19 AM Robert Stupp wrote: > Yea,

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisiting Java 11's experimental status

JDK8 seems like the safe devil we know, but in the interest of trying to gather a bit of data, I just posted a twitter poll. https://twitter.com/patrickmcfadin/status/1282791302065557504?s=21 On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:26 PM Elliott Sims wrote: > Personally, I'd planned to upgrade to 4.0 on

Contributor Meeting 2020-06-23

Yes! That is tomorrow at 10AM PST. Zoom: https://datastax.zoom.us/j/390839037 Add any agenda items here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-06-23+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting I think it would be great to get an update on the governance doc under vote right now.

Notes from Cassandra Kubernetes SIG 2020-06-18

Hi everyone, Video and notes uploaded here. The tl;dr is that John Sanda has been working on a common CRD and advancing the conversation. We'll be meeting again this Thursday for another round of discussion.

2020-06-04 Cassandra Kubernetes SIG

Hi everyone, Thanks to everyone who participated in our last zoom meeting. John walked through a few operator implementation examples with snippets of YAML to describe the resource types. It was great to have some of the original implementers there to discuss the trade-offs chosen for each.

Cassandra Kubernetes SIG Meeting 2020-06-04

Hi everyone, A quick reminder that we are meeting tomorrow. One of the action items left at the last meeting was collecting and sorting all of the CRDs currently being used by existing operators. John Sandra put in a lot of work (thank you!) pulling info from the CassKop, DataStax cass operator

Cassandra Kubernetes SIG meeting tomorrow

Hi everyone, Just a reminder that our SIG will be meeting tomorrow at 11AM PST. We have Zain Malik from the Kudo project coming to talk to us about operator builder that has just just entered the sandbox at the CNCF. John Sanda will not be able to make it this week but will forward dome notes on

Contributor meeting canceled today

Hi everyone, I realized I missed a huge action item for today's meeting. Jordan West created some discussion last meeting about how to get more discussion items brought forward. I will get back with him on that idea and email the dev list on some new proposals. After which, I can reschedule.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Workshop idea

The developer relations team at DataStax has a pretty cool workshop setup going with Twitch and YouTube we could volunteer for this effort. I think a 4.0 workshop with Ekaterina and Carlos would be amazing! You just need Skype and some content and we can handle the rest. Patrick On Wed, Jul 29,

Re: Welcome Jordan West, David Capwell, Zhao Yang and Ekaterina Dimitrova as Cassandra committers

Congratulations Jordan, David, Zhao and Ekaterina! It's great to see your names on the committer list! You have definitely made Apache Cassandra better through your efforts. Patrick On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:03 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Well-deserved congratulations! > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020

Re: [DISCUSS] Next steps for Kubernetes operator SIG

gt; > > Amazon EKS > > - > > > > Google GKE > > - > > > > Azure AKS > > - > > > > Documentation / Reference Implementations > > - > > > > Cloud storage classes > > - > > > > Ingress solutions > > - >

Re: Apache Cassandra logo

I'm going to call this out and take the hit. I think it's time for the PMC to re-evaluate the current Cassandra logo. For... reasons. We can put that in the post-4.0 bucket but it's a debate that needs to be had. Patrick On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:20 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > None of

Re: Apache Cassandra logo

d-life crisis and try to spice things up a bit with a new logo. > > From: Patrick McFadin > Date: Friday, 11 June 2021 at 17:44 > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache Cassandra logo > I'm going to call this out and take the hit. > > I think it's time for the

Re: Welcome Caleb Rackliffe as Cassandra committer

YES! Love seeing this. A very much deserved congratulations Caleb! Patrick On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:12 AM David Capwell wrote: > Congrats! > > > On May 14, 2021, at 8:52 AM, Charles Cao wrote: > > > > Congrats Caleb! Well deserved :) > > > > ~Charles > > > >> On May 14, 2021, at 07:30,

Re: Apache Cassandra logo

The web site change was approved by the PMC so maybe the web site logo should be added as a choice? On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 5:51 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I've notice that the Cassandra logo on the web site doesn't match the > "official" one in https://apache.org/logos/ any change the

Re: Additions to Cassandra ecosystem page?

This is a very interesting thread and has had me thinking quite a bit. Having to reason through who belongs on a list or not just seems very polarizing to me and given the length of this thread, I think that's playing out. This kind of energy is just not good for the larger community. And I'm

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc2 released

Congrats to everyone that worked on this iteration. If you haven't looked at the CHANGES.txt there were some great catches in RC1. Just like it should happen! On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:29 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Attracting new contributors

Could always go with Doom difficulty levels: - I'm Too Young to Die - Easy. - Hurt Me Plenty - Normal. - Ultra-Violence - Hard. - Nightmare - Very Hard. - On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:50 AM Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > Perhaps we could replace both Complexity and Difficulty

Re: [DISCUSSION] Attracting new contributors

; > > > - Piece of Cake > > - Let's Rock > > - Come Get Some > > - Damn I'm Good > > > > On 27/04/2021, 17:57, "Patrick McFadin" wrote: > > > > Could always go with Doom difficulty levels: > > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSSION] Attracting new contributors

Hi everyone. Jumping in because I love this topic. Thank you for starting it, Benjamin. The thread is about attracting new contributors, but the direction this has taken seems to be more along the line of how to attract code contributors. We list a lot of contributions that have nothing to do

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 released

This is pretty exciting and a huge milestone for the project. Congratulations to all the contributors who worked hard at making this the release it needed to be and honoring the database that powers the world. Patrick On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 4:10 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > The Cassandra team

Re: Welcome Stefan Miklosovic as Cassandra committer

Great news and much deserved! Congrats Stephan! On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:46 AM Joseph Lynch wrote: > Congratulations, Stefan! > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:07 AM Andrés de la Peña > wrote: > > > > Congrats! > > > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 05:47, Berenguer Blasi > > wrote: > > > > > Congrats

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 nb On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > +1 > > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> > >>  > >>> > >>> > >>> Proposal: > >>> >

Re: Welcome Adam Holmberg as Cassandra committer

Great to see you on the committer list Adam! On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 7:06 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Well deserved. Congratulations! > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:57 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > The PMC members are pleased to announce that Adam Holmberg has accepted > > the invitation to

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

I'm curious about this: "We will introduce mechanisms to spot and log linearizability violations for the user to file as bug reports" Why not throw an exception? Maybe it's just I don't quite see how this will be detected. I think this is very interesting though. Also, way to sell the next

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

p 23, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Oleksandr Petrov < > > > > > > > > > > > > oleksandr.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Short question: looking forward, how are we going to maintain > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-15234

Ah, I feel like cassandra.yaml discussions are such an evergreen topic. This was something brought up a while back, but I remember years ago we talked about emulating the config options that some other databases have done. Providing different versions of the config for different approaches. For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (take2)

+1 (nb) On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 3:45 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021, 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release. > > > > sha1: 924bf92fab1820942137138c779004acaf834187 > > Git: > > >

Re: Welcome Jon Meredith as Cassandra committer

Congratulations Jon and what great timing for the famous "Hold everything!" guy from the 4.0 release. :D https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/19/cassandra_40_delay/ On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:57 AM Yifan Cai wrote: > Congrats Jon! > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 8:48 AM Joshua McKenzie > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

I would be happy to host a Zoom as I've done in the past. I can post a transcript and the recording after the call. Instead of right after your talk Benedict, maybe we can set a time for next week and let everyone know the time? Patrick On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:05 AM bened...@apache.org

Re: Permission to create a CEP for pluggable SSTable formats

And this looks like it was done for anyone that finds this later. On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:41 AM Erick Ramirez wrote: > Noting here that I responded on the #cassandra-dev channel so someone could > grant Jacek edit access to the cwiki. Cheers! >

Re: Cassandra project biweekly status update 2022-01-03

What Ellis said. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 1:48 PM Jonathan Ellis wrote: > +10 > > Could we post these on the blog as well to reach a wider audience? > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:16 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> >> >> /wave Happy 2022 everyone! … >>> … >>> >>> It's been incredibly encouraging to

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-3: Guardrails

"it will be important that these guardrails can be modified via JMX as well" I think you all know my feels on JMX. Maybe this is something we can go straight to virtual tables? On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:12 PM C. Scott Andreas wrote: > Thank you for starting discussion on this CEP, Andrés! > >

Re: Cassandra project biweekly status update 2021-11-08

Since I have been re-playing Ghost of Tsushima, I felt a Haiku would be appropriate. my cluster is failing jConsole to the rescue now I am failing On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:46 PM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > First off - Congrats again to Sumanth Pasupuleti on becoming a committer on > the

Re: Welcome Sumanth Pasupuleti as Apache Cassandra Committer

Great to see this. Congrats Sumanth! On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 11:34 AM Brandon Williams wrote: > Congratulations Sumanth! > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:17 PM Oleksandr Petrov > wrote: > > > > The PMC members are pleased to announce that Sumanth Pasupuleti has > > recently accepted the invitation

Re: [DISCUSS] Virtual Tables and the future of NodeTool/JMX

This is coming from the "JMX needs to die in a fire" guy, but I think Nodetool needs to stay as-is in 4.x. This is a massive breaking change for operators which fits into the major version issue requirements. Also, this should probably be a CEP. Patrick On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:07 PM Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (third time is the charm)

+1 (nb) for Charmed Cassandra. Very proud of this community for holding to the commitment to quality. A lot of us were there at ApacheCon 2019 in Las Vegas. Sitting on the hallway carpet at the Flamingo, debating what a release should look like for the project. Here we are! On Fri, Jul 23, 2021

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 released

Wow. Just wow. Congratulations to everyone involved in this huge milestone. On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 1:04 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Cassandra version 4.0.0. > > Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right

Re: Welcome Anthony Grasso, Erick Ramirez and Lorina Poland as Cassandra committers

This is a great day for the project. These are three people that have been contributing continuously to the success of Cassandra users for so many years I can't even guess. Really makes me happy to see the project mature into a place where a diversity of contributions are recognized.

Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:39 PM Patrick McFadin > wrote: > >> I'm not sure if they can merge groups but from what I'm reading that >> wouldn't work either. What I'm seeing is a desire to not "promote vendors" >> which I believe is working against the project's

Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing list. I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for years after taking it over from Lynn Bender. https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/ We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been

Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

st things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we > wished the merits to go to the right persons. > > Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the > community. :-) > > Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin a > écrit : > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-17292 Move cassandra.yaml toward a nested structure around major database concepts

I'm going to put up a red flag of making config file changes of this scale on a dot release. This should really be a 5.0 consideration. With that, I would propose a #5. 5.0 nodes will only read the new config files and reject old config files. If any of you went through the config file changes

Re: [DISCUSS] List Apache Cassandra as a "company" on LinkedIn

I agree that is a problem. In the past, I have tried to make these as inclusive as possible by offering multiple time zones, recording every meeting, and posting it on YouTube with an email sent to dev@. What we can't substitute in a mailing list is the energy that comes from brainstorming, which

Re: [DISCUSS] List Apache Cassandra as a "company" on LinkedIn

Oh and +1 to the idea of making Apache Cassandra a company on LinkedIn. Same energy as the Twitter handle. Outgoing updates from the project. On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 2:41 PM Patrick McFadin wrote: > I agree that is a problem. In the past, I have tried to make these as > inclusive as po

Re: [DISCUSS] Non Coding Committers

Sharan has done a good job shining a spotlight on something that has created a weird bottleneck in the project. Docs and the Cassandra website are all in-tree, but it takes somebody who probably isn't even working on those things to commit any changes. Dinesh nailed it. It's silly. I'm sure the

Re: Project Status Update: 90-day catch-up edition [2023-10-27]

Sent you an invite Sam. Welcome to the community! On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:31 AM Sam wrote: > Please can I have an invite to the Slack workspace on this email. I'd like > to take a look through some of the items for first time contributors :-) > > Thanks! > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 18:10,

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

elease why not take it as an opportunity to release > more things. I am not saying that we will. Just that we should let that > door open. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Agreed. This is the reason I brought up the possibility of not > branching off 5

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

lease a 5.1-alpha1, > 5.1-dev-preview1, what ever we want to version this thing, from trunk or > any other branch name we want. > > -Jeremiah > > On Oct 24, 2023 at 2:03:41 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > I would like to have something for developers to use ASAP to try the >

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

ding it back. If there's 2 big releases in 6 >> months the community isn't any worse off. >> >> We either ship something, or nothing, and something is probably better. >> >> Jon >> >> >> On 2023/10/24 16:27:04 Patrick McFadin wrote: >> >> +1 to w

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

I’m going to be clearer in my statement. This has to be in 5.0, even if it’s alpha and ships after December, or this is going to be disaster that will take us much longer to unravel. On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:49 AM Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > +1 from me assuming we have tickets and two committer

Re: Push TCM (CEP-21) and Accord (CEP-15) to 5.1 (and cut an immediate 5.1-alpha1)

I'm really surprised to see this email. The last I heard everything was on track for getting into 5.0 and TBH and Accord is what a majority of users are expecting in 5.0. And how could this be a .1 release? What is it going to take to get it into 5.0? What is off track and how did we get here?

  1   2   >