Hi all,
I'm finally getting around to re-acquainting myself with stuff in our CVS, and I've noticed there's
a lot of duplicated files:
compare:
src\blocks\serializers\java\org\apache\cocoon\components\serializers\encoding
with:
Tony Collen wrote:
I would also like to propose that if the OutOfMemoryError with the
serializers block isn't fixed for 2.1.5, we exclude it by default before
release.. otherwise we're going to have a bunch of people asking the
same question over and over.
Nevermind, I am a couple days late
Hi,
On 20 Apr 2004, at 15:41, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I'd like to commit this as a cocoon-2.1 block if noone objects, as a
serializers block... It comes with full encoding/charsets/i18n
support, and i'd like to mark it (for now) as unstable...
Sounds good to me (though I would love to see Xalan
Pier Fumagalli pier at betaversion.org writes:
Me and Jerm (who's working right beside me ATM) have found some
problems with the serializers shipped with XALAN, as outlined in
those messages that randomly hit the mailing list...
Did I miss them? Which messages and which problems? Why
On 21.04.2004 15:27, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
I'm totally unable to create correct SCRIPT LINK and TEXTAREA
HTML tags with Xalan...
Dunno, maybe it's my config, but with the
garbage serializer, I'm able to validate my pages at the W3C validator
service, with the default one, I'm not...
Don't
On 21 Apr 2004, at 14:27, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Pier Fumagalli pier at betaversion.org writes:
Dunno, maybe it's my config, but with the
garbage serializer, I'm able to validate my pages at the W3C validator
service, with the default one, I'm not...
HTML or XHTML? Snippet from my Woody/CForms
On 21.04.2004 20:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
We were looking at it monday morning with Jeremy, and we have ben unable
to get to the point where you were (took us roughly 2 hours round and
round the configs)...
Took me 30 minutes to patch up the Garbage serializers, and another hour
to put it
On 21 Apr 2004, at 19:41, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 21.04.2004 15:27, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
I'm totally unable to create correct SCRIPT LINK and TEXTAREA
HTML tags with Xalan...
Dunno, maybe it's my config, but with the garbage serializer, I'm
able to validate my pages at the W3C validator
On 21 Apr 2004, at 20:22, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 21.04.2004 20:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
We were looking at it monday morning with Jeremy, and we have ben
unable to get to the point where you were (took us roughly 2 hours
round and round the configs)...
Took me 30 minutes to patch up the
On 21.04.2004 22:46, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Yes, I know. And I refered to the comment written above it. What I
meant was if the encoding is given through the XML declaration there
is no further need for the meta tag. But the spec states that both xml
declaration and meta tag must be included
Me and Jerm (who's working right beside me ATM) have found some
problems with the serializers shipped with XALAN, as outlined in those
messages that randomly hit the mailing list...
I basically fixed the GARBAGE serializers to work now cleanly as cocoon
serializers, simple job, but as far as
On 20 Apr 2004, at 15:41, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Me and Jerm (who's working right beside me ATM) have found some
problems with the serializers shipped with XALAN, as outlined in those
messages that randomly hit the mailing list...
I basically fixed the GARBAGE serializers to work now cleanly as
Hi Pier --
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I basically fixed the GARBAGE serializers to work now cleanly as cocoon
serializers, simple job, but as far as we could see, the new ones work
much _MUCH_ better than Xalan's own (they might be slower, but they're
more compliant).
I've been using your
On 20 Apr 2004, at 16:12, Steve Krulewitz wrote:
Hi Pier --
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I basically fixed the GARBAGE serializers to work now cleanly as
cocoon serializers, simple job, but as far as we could see, the new
ones work much _MUCH_ better than Xalan's own (they might be slower,
but
On 20.04.2004 16:41, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Me and Jerm (who's working right beside me ATM) have found some problems
with the serializers shipped with XALAN, as outlined in those messages
that randomly hit the mailing list...
Did I miss them? Which messages and which problems? Why are the
On 20 Apr 2004, at 19:47, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 20.04.2004 16:41, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Me and Jerm (who's working right beside me ATM) have found some
problems with the serializers shipped with XALAN, as outlined in
those messages that randomly hit the mailing list...
Did I miss them?
16 matches
Mail list logo
