[compress] Todos before release 1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi all, since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected several todos. I would like to discuss what is necessary for release 1 and what is not. * Of course administrative stuff: vote compress to proper etc. I don't have a clue of that currently. Who of you feels responsible for

Re: [jira] Created: (SANDBOX-297) AbstractTestCase.createArchive method appears to use incorrect file size - cut and paste error?

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Patch for this is now attached to Jira. If somebody has some time left.. :-) Cheers, Christian On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Sebb (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: AbstractTestCase.createArchive method appears to use incorrect file size - cut and paste error?

[compress] PATCH: Fwd: [jira] Created: (SANDBOX-299) ArchiveStreamFactory.createArchiveInputStream() createArchiveOutputStream() should throw Exception if archiverName is not recognised

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, I added a patch to Jira. The attached patch fixes the following: * ArchiveStreamFactory and CompressStreamFactory throw an Exception now if no fitting Archiver/Compressor cand be found * If the name of the impl. or the stream is null, an IllegalArgumentException will be thrown *

Re: [compress] Todos before release 1

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi All committers have write access to Gump data files. I can add it. It can go into Compress JIRA issue if you want to track it, but AFAIK Gump is not required. not necessary if you keep an eye on it :-)  * ChangeSet Support (SANDBOX-183): testcases and such are running. Its ..  

Re: [compress] Todos before release 1

2009-03-12 Thread sebb
On 12/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected several todos. I would like to discuss what is necessary for release 1 and what is not. * Of course administrative stuff: vote compress to proper etc. I

Re: [compress] Todos before release 1

2009-03-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-12, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected several todos. I'm a bit swamped at ${work} right now, but hope to prepare a PROPOSAL and start a formal vote tomorrow at latest. * Gump: I don't see

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons CLI 1.2 (RC6)

2009-03-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
Henri Yandell wrote: One more try :) Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites). Actually I could not let go this failing test with IBM JDK running on Maven without any reason. And finally I found out the

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC2

2009-03-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1, all tests pass now also on IBM JDK 6. Dan Fabulich wrote: My second attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-) RC2 includes sebb's patches that make numerous instance variables immutable. NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested DbUtils

[VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based on the old Jakarta template: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markuppathrev=753102 RAT only flags a few

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons CLI 1.2 (RC6)

2009-03-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: One more try :) Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites). Another problem of the site: Project

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-12 Thread Henri Yandell
+0 (meaning I'm in favour, but as I don't plan to be involved in the short term then I won't vote +1; this being one of the few votes where I think a +1 = Yes and I'm going to volunteer time). On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, since I'm unsure

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-03-13, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markuppathrev=753102 The compress component shall become a proper Commons component: [X] +1 Yes [ ] -1 No Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM. -Rahul On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based on the old