Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

2015-11-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Uwe, 2015-11-21 13:21 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel : > Java 1.6 would be old enough I think. > > But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema. > So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change. > Are you referring to SemVer here? I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.4 based on RC2

2015-11-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello sebb, I'm getting a difference when comparing the src archive with the tag: $ diff -rwq commons-net-3.4-src NET_3_4_RC1/ Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: .svn Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: doap_net.rdf Files commons-net-3.4-src/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/smtp/SimpleSMTPHeaderTestCase.java and

Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

2015-11-21 Thread Gary Gregory
I'd go with Java 7. Gary On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hi, > > any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build > is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine, > so I won't be able to test with

Re: Eirik Bjørsnøs' notsoserial deserialization protection agent, for Commons?

2015-11-21 Thread Torsten Curdt
> > 1) Is notsoserial a "great solution" or a "useful solution" in mitigating > the problem of promiscuous deserialization? > Useful? Certainly 2) Is it a "better" solution than IO-487? > Not sure - but does that really matter? It has a broader scope. 3) Is it in the interest of Commons and

commons-io 2.5 RC1 tomorrow

2015-11-21 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I've been through the latest changes on the ValidatingObjectInputStream and I think they look good. RC1 vote starts in approx 20 hrs, if anyone else wants to take a final look. Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [COLLECTIONS] Release road map for 4.1

2015-11-21 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/21/2015 11:45 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote: > Hi, > > How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1? the plan is to start the release process tomorrow. There is only one issue open that needs to be resolved for a 4.1 release, and I am working on it. Thomas

Re: [JXPath] duplicate JIRA

2015-11-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2015-11-21 9:39 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel : > Hi, > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified > duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED). > > Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item. > Done. Thank you!

Re: [JXPath] Pull requests available

2015-11-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I'll take care of pushing out a new release after I've reviewed the proposed changes. Benedikt 2015-11-21 2:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory : > Thank you Uwe. > > The next step here is to get a release manager to volunteer. Anyone? > > Gary > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:15 PM,

[COLLECTIONS] Release road map for 4.1

2015-11-21 Thread Uwe Barthel
Hi, How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1? -- Uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

2015-11-21 Thread Uwe Barthel
Java 1.6 would be old enough I think. But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema. So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change. How will it handled in other Commons with projects two digit version schema? Maybe should be used:

[JXPATH] Java Version

2015-11-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine, so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't see a reason to keep support for such old Java versions. Thoughts?

[JXPath] duplicate JIRA

2015-11-21 Thread Uwe Barthel
Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED). Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item. -- Uwe - To unsubscribe,