Hello Uwe,
2015-11-21 13:21 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel :
> Java 1.6 would be old enough I think.
>
> But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema.
> So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change.
>
Are you referring to SemVer here? I'm not sure
Hello sebb,
I'm getting a difference when comparing the src archive with the tag:
$ diff -rwq commons-net-3.4-src NET_3_4_RC1/
Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: .svn
Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: doap_net.rdf
Files
commons-net-3.4-src/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/smtp/SimpleSMTPHeaderTestCase.java
and
I'd go with Java 7.
Gary
On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build
> is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine,
> so I won't be able to test with
>
> 1) Is notsoserial a "great solution" or a "useful solution" in mitigating
> the problem of promiscuous deserialization?
>
Useful? Certainly
2) Is it a "better" solution than IO-487?
>
Not sure - but does that really matter? It has a broader scope.
3) Is it in the interest of Commons and
I've been through the latest changes on the
ValidatingObjectInputStream and I think they look good.
RC1 vote starts in approx 20 hrs, if anyone else wants to take a final look.
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 11/21/2015 11:45 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1?
the plan is to start the release process tomorrow.
There is only one issue open that needs to be resolved for a 4.1
release, and I am working on it.
Thomas
2015-11-21 9:39 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel :
> Hi,
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified
> duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED).
>
> Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item.
>
Done. Thank you!
I'll take care of pushing out a new release after I've reviewed the
proposed changes.
Benedikt
2015-11-21 2:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Thank you Uwe.
>
> The next step here is to get a release manager to volunteer. Anyone?
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:15 PM,
Hi,
How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1?
-- Uwe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Java 1.6 would be old enough I think.
But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema.
So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change.
How will it handled in other Commons with projects two digit version schema?
Maybe should be used:
Hi,
any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build
is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine,
so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't see
a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.
Thoughts?
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified duplicate
of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED).
Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item.
-- Uwe
-
To unsubscribe,
12 matches
Mail list logo