Re: [RESULT] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 based on RC2

Thanks Matt! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-02-02 19:30 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

Congratulations to the math team for the exciting news of starting the new TLP. Sorry to have promised some developments in December that I have not yet delivered. Our immigration situation changed and we had to move overseas. I should get the contributions out of the docket this month. -Eric

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

I think Apache Math sounds most promising. Best regards Martin Grotle Soukup 2016-02-01 18:06 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names > for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to > respond. This

Re: svn commit: r12178 - in /release/commons/collections: binaries/ source/

Sorry about that; fixed in r12184 On 2 February 2016 at 18:07, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/02/2016 07:03 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: sebb >> Date: Tue Feb 2 18:03:09 2016 >> New Revision: 12178 >> >> Log: >> Archive collections release 4.1 >> >> Removed:

[RESULT] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 based on RC2

The vote has passed, with misgivings from some PMC members that others have dismissed as too minor to hold up the release. I believe that unanimity is important whenever possible, so it is after long deliberation that I have decided to proceed with the release of Weaver 1.2 as the delay has

Fwd: Re: svn commit: r12178 - in /release/commons/collections: binaries/ source/

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: svn commit: r12178 - in /release/commons/collections: binaries/ source/ Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:07:08 +0100 From: Thomas Neidhart To: comm...@commons.apache.org On 02/02/2016 07:03 PM, s...@apache.org wrote: >

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

On 02/01/2016 06:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names > for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to > respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two > tallies will be presented: one among those who

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring, > descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't > be offended if others want to be more creative. > > My suggestion is > >

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Phil Steitz > wrote: > > > We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring, > > descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy,

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

On 2/2/16 12:11 PM, Eric Barnhill wrote: > Congratulations to the math team for the exciting news of starting > the new TLP. Sorry to have promised some developments in December > that I have not yet delivered. Our immigration situation changed > and we had to move overseas. I should get the

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:17:06 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring, >

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

The Apache commons math library already has a reputation and is well kvown. Any name that does not involve the words Apache and math will require a lot of rebranding or years of explaining to people that the TLP named X is really just the library formerly known as commons math. Removing "commons"

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On 3 February 2016 at 11:30, Patrick Meyer wrote: > The Apache commons math library already has a reputation and is well kvown. > Any name that does not involve the words Apache and math will require a lot > of rebranding or years of explaining to people that the TLP named X

RE: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

Apache Math -Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 12:07 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: [math] [POLL] new TLP name Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new [math]-based TLP. All

Re: [math] Volunteer for the new TLP PMC

It would be an honor to join. Otmar On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/1/16 6:27 AM, Gilles wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:22:30 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Please respond to this thread if you are a

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:49:21 -0500, Christopher wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it looks to me like just plain "math" is the

[Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two tallies will be presented: one among those

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Gilles wrote: > ...From a user's perspective, just "Math" is the worst possible choice: if > you use a search engine to get to one of the project's pages, you'll get > many more hits related to "math" in general than to the Java

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

On 02/02/2016 11:19, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:49:21 -0500, Christopher wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things

Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two tallies

Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:53:53 +, sebb wrote: On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Please select your top choice among the following suggested names for the new [math]-based

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

My own vote is for Apache Math Phil On 2/1/16 10:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names > for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to > respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two > tallies will be

Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

On 2 February 2016 at 13:39, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:53:53 +, sebb wrote: >> >> On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:52:24 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:11:24 +1100, Peter Ansell wrote: On 3 February 2016 at 11:30, Patrick Meyer wrote: The Apache commons math library

Re: [math] Volunteer for the new TLP PMC

I'd be honored to join the new PMC. I may not be super active on the coding side, but am happy to provide oversight On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Phil Steitz wrote: > Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer > interested in joining the PMC for the new

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:11:24 +1100, Peter Ansell wrote: On 3 February 2016 at 11:30, Patrick Meyer wrote: The Apache commons math library already has a reputation and is well kvown. Any name that does not involve the words Apache and math will require a lot of rebranding or

Re: [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:11:24 +1100, Peter Ansell wrote: > >> On 3 February 2016 at 11:30, Patrick Meyer wrote: >> >>> The Apache commons math library already has a reputation and is well >>> kvown.

Re: [Math] Technical objection (Was: [math] [POLL] new TLP name)

On 2 February 2016 at 12:11, Ate Douma wrote: > On 2016-02-02 12:43, Gilles wrote: >> >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names >>> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

Good question. I have proposed it many times in the past On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:03 PM Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:05:57 +, James Carman wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:50 AM Gilles > > wrote: > > > >> > >> "Math"

Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:33:38 +, Mark Thomas wrote: On 02/02/2016 11:19, Gilles wrote: On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:49:21 -0500, Christopher wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

For the record, I really do like epsilon also. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:14 PM James Carman wrote: > Apache Math > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names >>

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

I vote for Apache Math Components. 2016-02-01 18:06 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > Please select your top choice among the following suggested names > for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to > respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time