> On Sep 15, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I for one appreciate Rob's efforts and would also be happy to turn the task
> over to Services with our input which IMO is just our project name "Apache
> Commons".
>
Sounds good to me.
> Gary
>
>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:39 PM
I am refactoring some of the code to make the Builder and Hash classes
enclosed in the ProtoBloomFilter class. I have also add the proxy
serializer as noted in the effective java talk. This simplifies the
classes significantly. I will have unit tests and fix the javadocs before
the next push.
I for one appreciate Rob's efforts and would also be happy to turn the task
over to Services with our input which IMO is just our project name "Apache
Commons".
Gary
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:39 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Pardon to cause a stir here, but that was just a mock-up that I sent to
>
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:17 PM sebb wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 00:17, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 08:15, Claude Warren a écrit
> :
> > >
> > > @Gilles
> > >
> > > I am happy to rename the package without the plural if that is the
> > > standard, I
Pardon to cause a stir here, but that was just a mock-up that I sent to
“Central Services” as an idea from which to work. I had no intentions of
suggesting that we vote on it or even use is as I think that there are spacing
and font issues with it. I thought that my email with the mock-up made
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 00:17, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 08:15, Claude Warren a écrit :
> >
> > @Gilles
> >
> > I am happy to rename the package without the plural if that is the
> > standard, I will also fix the indent issue. Is there a definition that can
> >
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:17 PM sebb wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 21:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Like we have elsewhere, I will be dropping @author tags from Java
> sources.
>
> As I recall, previously they were moved to the pom rather than being
> totally dropped.
>
Yes,
Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 23:40, sebb a écrit :
>
> Surely it would be better to use the JIRA
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-86
I don't get it: We agreed to let "Central Services" provide the logo
and now we are again presenting homegrown ones...
Do we really want to
Hi.
Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 08:15, Claude Warren a écrit :
>
> @Gilles
>
> I am happy to rename the package without the plural if that is the
> standard, I will also fix the indent issue. Is there a definition that can
> be quickly imported into Eclipse to do the proper formatting?
Hopefully,
Surely it would be better to use the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-86
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 21:13, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Could we please use *one* (and the original) thread to collect ideas?
>
> Gilles
>
> Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 19:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
> >
Could we please use *one* (and the original) thread to collect ideas?
Gilles
Le dim. 15 sept. 2019 à 19:47, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 2019, at 8:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
>
> I like the Alan Parsons
> On Sep 15, 2019, at 8:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
I like the Alan Parsons Project, a little :-P
>
>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does
IMO, we consider that for 50 and keep rolling here.
Gary
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:14 AM Xeno Amess wrote:
> +0
> As for 49 comming soon, I really think it a good time to consider
> fixing https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/5 and
> https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/428
>
>
+0
As for 49 comming soon, I really think it a good time to consider
fixing https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/5 and
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/428
Gary Gregory 于2019年9月15日周日 上午8:07写道：
>
> +1
>
> Builds OK from the git RC tag using Oracle Java 8:
>
> Apache Maven
That said, it is nice to look at :-)
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 08:10 Gary Gregory wrote:
> I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does anyone
>> have
I do not think we need "Project", we're not a 70s progrock band ;-)
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 07:45 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Here’s a potential logo that I mocked up and sent to Kenneth. Does anyone
> have any opinions on this? I felt like something similar to the one that
> Sally sent across for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
