On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 21:27, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Strangely I am not receiving emails from GH actions (or jenkins) to
> inform
> > me that the build fails after a commit. There may be a setting for the GH
> > actions that is missing to enable e-mail to the committer after a build
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 20:52, Sumanth Rajkumar
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have raised PR #113 after rebasing to the master branch with Alex's
> checkstyle changes
>
> As per feedback, I have made the following changes
> a) Added javadoc comments
> b) Ensured test coverage
> c) Renamed accessors on the
Hello.
Le dim. 26 juin 2022 à 22:17, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 21:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Jenkins (as well as local build of [Math]) is failing:
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Commons/job/commons-math/336/
> >
> > Two regressions appeared
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 21:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Jenkins (as well as local build of [Math]) is failing:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Commons/job/commons-math/336/
>
> Two regressions appeared in unit tests untouched for ages:
>
Hello.
Jenkins (as well as local build of [Math]) is failing:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Commons/job/commons-math/336/
Two regressions appeared in unit tests untouched for ages:
org.apache.commons.math4.legacy.analysis.polynomials.PolynomialsUtilsTest
Hi,
I have raised PR #113 after rebasing to the master branch with Alex's
checkstyle changes
As per feedback, I have made the following changes
a) Added javadoc comments
b) Ensured test coverage
c) Renamed accessors on the interface
> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> In "DComplex", I propose that the
Hello,
Apologies for the late response. The second half of this week turned
out to be extraordinarily busy and I haven't had any time for commons.
Thank you for the detailed review, Gary. I am cancelling this vote and
will be making those changes for RC3. It may be a few days more before
I can
I've merged the docker build into the default branch.
It may not be perfect, but it does work well enough!
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 17:14, sebb wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 15:59, Alex Remily wrote:
> >
> > I went back and reviewed docker setup at your link:
> >
> >
