Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.9 based on RC1

+1 Release this artifact. build, tests passing well, everything from defaultGoal looks good to me. the site, hashes look good. Regards, Amey --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

Re: [Text] do we have number to word converter ?

le.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Locale.html Regards, Amey > > > Gary > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 14:47 Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: Amey Jadiye Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 2:04 PM > > > > > > Hi,

[Text] do we have number to word converter ?

Hi, Does anyone know if apache commons have any utility which converts number to words ? Ex. 3957 = Three Thousand Nine Hundred and fifty seven. Regards, Amey

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Commons Parent POM 51 based on RC2

+1 Build and basic verifications look good. Installed from src locally. Tested on commons-text, commons-graph (forked repo). used LTS for testing. everything works fine. mvn -Duser.name=ameyjadiye -Dcommons.release.dryRun=true -Ptest-deploy clean verify package site deploy apache-rat:check

Re: [Graph] Build fails (unit tests)

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 8:50 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > 2020-06-13 16:57 UTC+02:00, Amey Jadiye : > > Hello Gilles, > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:36 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> After th

Re: [Graph] Build fails (unit tests)

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 8:27 PM Amey Jadiye wrote: > Hello Gilles, > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:36 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> After the migration from SVN to "gitbox", we noticed that the >> _first_ build failed due to 3 unit

Re: [Graph] Build fails (unit tests)

Hello Gilles, On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:36 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > After the migration from SVN to "gitbox", we noticed that the > _first_ build failed due to 3 unit tests not passing (see e.g. the > Travis report referred to the JIRA report[1]). > > The move to "git" was

Re: [commons-graph] branch master updated: Travis CI configuration.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:40 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > 2020-06-12 12:32 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess : > > Hi. > > I see the current travis-ci scripts. > > Do we really care only jdk8? > > Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11, > > as it is a stable version? > > Or

[commons-graph] modularization [was]Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

are outdated.] > Just modularization brach is ok for now. Thank You! > Regards, > Gilles > > > > > > [...] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Graph] moving to git

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:50 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Repository available: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git > > Thanks Gilles. Regards, > Gilles > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.5.0 based on RC1

. Regards, Amey Jadiye On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 6:04 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache Commons > BCEL 6.4.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons BCEL > 6.5.0. > > Apache Commons BCEL 6.5.0 RC1 is available

Re: [Graph] moving to git

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:44 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mer. 3 juin 2020 à 16:03, Jochen Wiedmann > a écrit : > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:30 AM Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > > > I wanted to fetch opinion about moving commons-graph to git and > poss

Re: [Graph] moving to git

Hi All, Can we get more opinions on this? what PMC thinks on this ? I wish to get commons-graph on git at least. okey with full sandbox to git if it's easy with other operational aspects. Regards, Amey Jadiye On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, 7:09 AM Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 a

Re: [Graph] moving to git

aph to git. also if we move full sandbox to git and tomorrow if we migrate commons-graph to proper and to its own repository, will the git commit history for only graph be separately migrated since sandbox is root repository ? > Sorry if not very helpful. > > Bruno > > > On Tuesd

[Graph] moving to git

, not sure if Apache gitbox have same capabilities ? Regards, Amey Jadiye

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

Hi Gilles, On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, 4:36 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > 2020-06-01 22:18 UTC+02:00, Amey Jadiye : > > Thanks for all the information/support guys. I dug into the archives and > > found this[1] is the most recent interest shown by someone in > &

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC [5] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-graph/commons-graph/0.8.1 [6] https://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/ Regards, Amey Jadiye On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:22 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > I have a vague interest in this library as Jenk

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

Hi Gilles, I found some useful things in jira-sandbox with component name Graph. I will dig some more important things and come up with some plan. Thanks for your help. Regards, Amey On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 6:42 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Le sam. 30 mai 2020 à 14:12, Am

commons-graph still on sandbox ?

Hi All, I'm working on an interesting project which uses Graph, I knew there is commons-graph available and I'm trying to use it. I have a couple of questions. 1. Why graph in the sandbox? any plan of releasing it with 1.0 ? 2. I don't see its repo on GitHub thus I cant contribute a few

Re: Email validation

Hi Amit, Yes you can use EmailValidator from commons-validator, it can validate all kind of email addresses. It internally uses DomainValidator for tld validations. for all the details about tlds you can refer the below source code.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.7 based on RC1

Checked Commons IO 2.7 - RC1 and here is my +1 . 1. Build and Tests look good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Checkstyle is good. 5. Hashes and Site look good. Checked on:- Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-18T00:03:14+05:30) Maven home:

Re: [all] How PRs could be better

We might need to develop a plugin to achieve this, and yes as Jochen mentioned this is just a scenario for bug fixes, not for new functionality and enhancements. 1. Plugin must-have functionality like sure-fire to execute the test cases. 2. Plugin must have the functionality to use git, so it can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.8 based on RC2

Checked RC2 of Commons CSV 1.8 and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests look good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Spotbug looks good (I wonder why dont we have it in plugins ? ),[there is one issue with spotbug but i saw in comments its intentionaly done, so okey] 5.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

Looks good with tests, rat, clirr, spotbug and javadoc. I can see 4 errors with checkstyle but they seem to be minor. checked with java 8 and 11. hashes and sig are fine. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Amey On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:20 PM Carl Hall wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and

Re: [All] Sonarcloud reports zero coverage

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 4:57 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > Hi, > > Le dim. 26 janv. 2020 à 18:06, Amey Jadiye a écrit > : > > > > For almost all the repo[1][2] this is suddenly dropped I can see an event > > in coverage activity written as "

Re: [All] Sonarcloud reports zero coverage

For almost all the repo[1][2] this is suddenly dropped I can see an event in coverage activity written as "Quality Profile: Changes in 'Sonar way' (Java)". I see there are some changes done on profile[3] on 7th Jan, It must be that change broke down the coverage. ? [1]

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Parent 50 based on RC1

On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 2:44 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > On 14 Dec 2019, at 17:24, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 9:35 PM Alex Herbert <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >&

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Parent 50 based on RC1

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 9:35 PM Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > On 14 Dec 2019, at 14:47, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > > Looks good to me. > > +1 (Non-Binding) > > > > Few things observed in the mvn site. > > 1. In site >> Project Reports >>

Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Parent 50 based on RC1

Looks good to me. +1 (Non-Binding) Few things observed in the mvn site. 1. In site >> Project Reports >> Changes : - Changes are not mentioned since version 47, it's nice to see a short description of changes. 2. In site >> COMMONS : - link of Components, Sandbox, Dormant is not working, if not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.1 based on RC1

looks good with rat, japicmp, checkstyle, some warnings with javadoc. checked with java8 and 11. hashes and sig are fine. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Amey On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:08 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed one important bug since Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0 was > released, so I

Re: [CLI] Option arguments without - or --

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:41 PM sebb wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 07:04, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Looks like the functionality is not present in the code base. > > > > I'm proposing the SimpleCommandParser which can implement >

Re: [CLI] Option arguments without - or --

Hi, Looks like the functionality is not present in the code base. I'm proposing the SimpleCommandParser which can implement CommandLineParser for achieving below requirements. let me know your thoughts on this. Regards, Amey On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:32 AM Amey Jadiye wrote: > Hi, >

[CLI] Option arguments without - or --

Hi, I'm developing a console application and required to get the command and argument in non traditional fashion where command name dont start with -name=value or --name=value. I expect the cli library should handle in below fashion Push 1 2 3 4 Pull 5 8 9 Where push and Pull is command

Re: [VOTE] Redirect github notifications to issues@

+1 On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, 3:05 am Marcelo Vanzin, wrote: > I'm opening a vote based on recent discussions about the extra noise > generated by github updates going to dev@. So please vote: > > - +1 to redirect github updates of all commons repos to the issues@ list > - -1 to keep things as is > >

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, 5:25 pm Gilles hi. > Hi Gilles, > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 22:04:24 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > Hello Maxim / All > > > > I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the > > error. > > In the clirr code, I f

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

/482762a13f739631f94d03642b0a55a9b7214c44 Regards, Amey On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:53 AM Amey Jadiye wrote: > I spared little time on finding issue however didn't found it in clirr(may > be hidden somewhere), today will check if clirr maven plugin have any > issues. also I saw that few other apach

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

I spared little time on finding issue however didn't found it in clirr(may be hidden somewhere), today will check if clirr maven plugin have any issues. also I saw that few other apache commons modules having same issue and are released. I also gave try on revapi with commons collection4 4.3RC2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Text 1.5 based on RC3

Checked RC3 of Commons Text 1.5, here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests look good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Spotbug looks good. 5. Checkstyle is good. 6. Hashes look good. Checked on:- Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;

Re: [Statistics] Preferred name of the Jira project? (Was: [All] New git repository)

+1, STATISTICS. Regards, Amey On Thu, Jan 11, 2018, 5:42 AM Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > The preferred name of the component was "Commons Statistics". > What shall be the preferred name of the Jira project's "key" > (maximal length is 10 characters)? > > Regards, >

Re: [All] New git repository

How about Commons Statistics ?, Sounds descriptive. Regards, Amey On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, 4:55 PM Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > I'm about to ask INFRA to create the usual tools (git, > JIRA, github, ...) for a new component: "Commons Stat". > > Is the name "Stat" OK for

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.2 based on RC1

Checked RC1, and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests looks good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Findbug looks good. 5. Checkstyle is good. 6. Hashes looks good. 7. Site looks good. Checked on :- Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > >> Hello Amey. > > > Hi Gilles, > >> >> >> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > Hello Amey. Hi Gilles, > > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:45:45 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > >> Pardon me for pulling this thread up again, I havent read anything about >> "Comm

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Pardon me for pulling this thread up again, I havent read anything about "Commons Geometry" since long (or may be I missed any other disscussion? ). is someone working on this ? what is the final decision ? I'm having good amount of time to spend on this now, appreciate If someone direct me to

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

o commons-text. :( > > Sorry, > Pascal > > Am 29.09.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Amey Jadiye: > > Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to > > release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils if > > lang-3.7 is far. > &

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils if lang-3.7 is far. Regards, Amey On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > After thinking more about it, I came

Re: [apache/commons-text] [TEXT-102] StrLookup.resourceBundleLookup(ResourceBundle). Make new (0b06169)

I usually keep the practice of running just `mvn` (which indeed run clean verify apache-rat:check clirr:check checkstyle:check findbugs:check javadoc:javadoc) and if that's fine my submitted PR is always and 100% looks green. Regards, Amey On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Gary Gregory

Re: [text] Release 1.2

I wish to see TEXT-101 part of release which will settle down many enquiries from user-dl about RandomStringUtils without releasing commons-lang 3.6.1. I have open PR for it, may be you or Rob have to check that. Regards, Amey On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Gary Gregory

Re: [text] license header

Ah, my bad actually after your commit for TEXT-102 Travis was failed [1]. so seems we are good here. [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/commons-text/builds/278697845 Regards, Amey On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Its already there [1]

Re: [text] license header

Its already there [1] and fails if something is not correct in *main* but I guess it doesn't check anything for test resources and test java files. thats why build was passing till date. [1]. https://github.com/apache/commons-text/blob/master/pom.xml Regards, Amey On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:58

Re: [ALL] Javadoc.io - a new GitHub badge for our projects?

+1, LGTM. Regards, Amey On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, 3:24 PM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I just became aware of https://javadoc.io/ a > website which provides hosting for all javadocs on Maven Central. They also > provide badges for GitHub. Do we want to

Re: [numbers-complex] Checkstyle "unknown tag: if"

It is there https://github.com/apache/commons-numbers/tree/complex-dev Try : git fetch origin git checkout -t origin/complex-dev BTW, I did mvn site:run which runs fine and there is zero error under reports > Checkstyle. Also did `mvn clean verify checkstyle:check` which run clean, "zero errors"

Re: Moved RSU to Text [was] [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

12, 2017, at 12:38 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Rob, > > I'm going to be away from my computer until Friday. I'll give it a look > then if that's alright with you. > > Cheers, > -Rob > > > > I ha

Re: Moved RSU to Text [was] [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

> > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 06:55:49 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Rob, > >>> > >>> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests

Re: [text] Invalid unicode sequences on .substring of RandomStringGenerator

the actual String of given length ? I found when I pass .50 it returns me ~70 length of string, as commons-dev its good but as application-dev its weird. Regards, Amey > > > > From: Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org&g

[text] Invalid unicode sequences on .substring of RandomStringGenerator

Hi Folks, While working on RandomStringGenerator I found when I'm doing .substring on generated random string its failing intermittently with sequence of surrogate pair. same bug was raised in commons-lang https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-100 Is this possible bug with

Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Benedikt, > > > > How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? > [snip] > > I’m on board with this if folks are complaining and the original intent >

Re: [LANG] Releasing 3.6.1

Hello Benedikt, How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? I will submit changes [1] related to this in fact i'm fixing couple of failing test cases ATM. If you are planning to release 3.6.1 just to remove deprecation and deprecate RandomStringUtils back in Lang - 3.7 I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Jelly 1.0.1 based on RC3.

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would be really nice, also why trunk and tag don't looks similar ? > > Is this something we added recently and not present in trunk ? I saw BUILDING.md only in tag, whatever written in .md is ok t

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Jelly 1.0.1 based on RC3.

That would be really nice, also why trunk and tag don't looks similar ? On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sep 2, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm sorry, I did not find

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Jelly 1.0.1 based on RC3.

I'm sorry, I did not find the Dockerfile in repository, where can i get install.sh ? what are you trying here ? Regards, Amey On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Having a bit of trouble with getting Docker up and running: > > C:\temp\rc\test>docker

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.5 based on RC1

Checked RC1, and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests looks good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is good. 4. Findbug is failing with Error SF_SWITCH_FALLTHROUGH but no issues since mentioned in comment *break intentionally excluded* 5. Checkstyle looks good. 6. Hashes looks good. 7. Site

Re: Fwd: RandomStringUtils and RandomStringGenerator

ption. > > Cheers, > Pascal > > Am 23.08.2017 um 21:39 schrieb Amey Jadiye: > > I think we should keep that deprecated in lang and go with plan discussed > > in below mail trail. > > > > http://markmail.org/message/azxw4nai7fs2laas > > > > Regards,

Fwd: RandomStringUtils and RandomStringGenerator

I think we should keep that deprecated in lang and go with plan discussed in below mail trail. http://markmail.org/message/azxw4nai7fs2laas Regards, Amey -- Forwarded message -- From: Gilles Date: Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:40 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Discovery to dormant?

+1 On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Discovery to > dormant. > > Reasons: > - Last release was version 0.5 in 2011. > - The last bugfix and feature commits are from 2011. >

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

+1 On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to > dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007. > > So

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

I'm +1 to this change, I would be more than happy to lend my hands to help on this front. pardon me for being quite because some heavy work on my day job. I don't want to fork this thread to different discussion but I have one simple doubt that rather creating whole new component why don't we

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding potential Travis-CI solutions

Closed PR. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > looking at inclination of community I will be closing the PR without > expecting merge after a week by 14th August 2017 unless someone see it's > useful. > > Reference will be there in clo

Re: Empty repositories for some retired components on github

+1, If something is/will not in use better delete them. Cheers, Amey On Sun, Aug 13, 2017, 11:54 PM Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hello everybody, > > just a small detail. > > For some retired components there are still github mirrors (with an > empty repository): > >

Re: [All] Jenkins: where are the projects?

I do remember Infra team warned in end of July '17 to remove Commons from top-level to A-D or C tab else they were about to remove it on 1st August '17 ... And they did it . But no worries we already had it in A-D tab. https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Commons/ Regards, Amey On Thu, Aug

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi Amey, > > Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > Hmm, isn't that easy with just Travis ? We just have to add java9 > > option(not sure it have RC) and trigger build it will automatically check > > build and tests. IIRC fo

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hmm, isn't that easy with just Travis ? We just have to add java9 option(not sure it have RC) and trigger build it will automatically check build and tests. IIRC for few components we are having java9 Travis env already set. Regards, Amey On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, 8:38 PM Jörg Schaible

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding potential Travis-CI solutions

looking at inclination of community I will be closing the PR without expecting merge after a week by 14th August 2017 unless someone see it's useful. Reference will be there in closed PR list on github so if someone need it in future it will be there. Regards, Amey On Fri, Aug 4, 2017, 3:02 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2 based on RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > I would like to release the [jcs] component to resolve some overdue bugs > > Apache Commons JCS 2.2 RC1 is available for review at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r20728). > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2 based on RC1

Ah, got it. Thanks -Amey On Sun, Aug 6, 2017, 12:57 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-08-05 19:41 GMT+02:00 Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>: > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I see we have individual jars released for > > each modul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2 based on RC1

gt; | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-08-05 17:51 GMT+02:00 Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>: > > > Even for me build and tests working fine. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2 based on RC1

Even for me build and tests working fine. [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache Commons JCS . SUCCESS [ 10.196 s] [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: Core . SUCCESS [04:49 min] [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache ...

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding potential Travis-CI solutions

Hi, Yes we are giving up the simplicity of travis but I see some advantages over it, all of them are listed in my previous mail, let me try to put them again. 1. Travis provides very limited JDK at this point [1] and travis builds can become more flexible and we will have more control over the

Re: [RNG] Generating for nums

y > > traveler.travel(nextRandomDirection()); > > where > > public CardinalDirection nextRandomDirection() { >return rng.next(CardinalDirection.class); > } > > Gary > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: [RNG] Generating for nums

Hi, What's usecase for this BTW ? Might be unaware about requirement but this forced me to think why would someone need random enum ? Enums are generally "limited" immutable constants and people choose enum over the array of constants for good reason, however random provider seems best suited

Re: Help with task: Implement Ziggurat algorithm

Hello 仓央杰克 , If you are not in possition to submit this I'm taking this task up for completion. I will submit my PR in a week or so you may give your inputs on that. Regards, Amey On Jul 5, 2017 10:20 AM, "Amey Jadiye" <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: code should go in commo

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

.travis.yml. what do you guys think ? Regards, Amey On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, I'm taking Commons Text as my test guineapig for jacoco style > implementation , once confident in implementation we can move it to other > componen

Re: Fwd: [2/2] commons-cli git commit: add default mvn default (clean, test, clirr, rat and javadoc) and run it on travis

Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net > wrote: > Imho yes, but to make this possible existing violations have to be > analyzed and then either fixed or ignored. > > > Am 01.08.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Amey Jadiye: > >> It would be nice to add checkstyle and findbug as

Fwd: [2/2] commons-cli git commit: add default mvn default (clean, test, clirr, rat and javadoc) and run it on travis

It would be nice to add checkstyle and findbug as well ? Regards, Amey -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:57 PM Subject: [2/2] commons-cli git commit: add default mvn default (clean, test, clirr, rat and javadoc) and run it on

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Email 1.5 Based on RC1

Hi, I have fixed this, and yes reason was though those .eml files was added in exclusion but in reports and not in build. I have raised PR and tested it on my local. https://github.com/apache/commons-email/pull/2 Regards, Amey On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Stefan Bodewig

[email] failing with mvn clean cobertura:cobertura coveralls:report

Hi, while fixing rat issue with commons email I also found that the travis is failing with the below configurations, thought build is working fine. seems like we dont have plugin configured in pom.xml after_success: - mvn clean cobertura:cobertura coveralls:report [INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Email 1.5 Based on RC1

Checked RC1, and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests looks good. 2. Clirr looks good. 3. Rat is not good as mentioned by gary, as they are test resources can be put to ignore list. 4. Findbug looks good. 5. There are 302 Checkstyle issues but they are non-blocker to release. 6. Hashes

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

Thanks, I'm taking Commons Text as my test guineapig for jacoco style implementation , once confident in implementation we can move it to other components. Regards, Amey On Jul 28, 2017 5:39 PM, "Rob Tompkins" <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:10

Re: [all/travis-ci] Regarding using ibmjava on travis

Hi Rob, If this is still pending I would like to pickup this task. If docker is not much helpful OR we need to wait for it I think we should try what jacoco did. what do you think ? Is it mandatory to use official java images ?Else I am also thinking to create my own ibmjdk8 image on top of

Re: [ALL] Moving view on builds.a.o

Hi, Seems like we are not the only defaulters ;-) ... https://builds.apache.org/ Below resources might be helpful to move Commons top level view to nested view, you might need admin access to do that. https://isticatedcoder.wordpress.com/2015/10/05/structure-jenkins-with-nested-views/

Re: [collections][proposal] Java 7

+1 Regards, Amey On Wed, Jul 26, 2017, 3:48 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I propose we make Java 7 the minimum for Commons Collection 4.2. > > Gary >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Collections moved to git

BTW, I just sorted all proper components and below is the list of component still using svn, seems quit a lot work still remaining ;-) bcel | http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0 bcel beanUtils |http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/

Re: [all] Removal of old pgp key from https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS

fair enough not to remove keys ;) , Thanks. Regards, Amey On Wed, Jul 19, 2017, 1:32 AM Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2017-07-18, Amey Jadiye wrote: > > > I observed we have lot of keys in > https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS, > > even keys o

Re: [all] Removal of old pgp key from https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS

unix=commons > > Gary > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I observed we have lot of keys in https://www.apache.org/dist/ > commons/KEYS > > , > > even keys of developers who might have resigned from commons,

[all] Removal of old pgp key from https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS

I observed we have lot of keys in https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS, even keys of developers who might have resigned from commons, can we just review and remove keys of developers who resigned or no more active ? Regards, Amey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC2

Checked RC2, and here is my +1 (non-binding). 1. Build and Tests are passing clean 2. Clirr and Rat looks good. 3. Findbug show two DM_DEFAULT_ENCODING warning but non-blocker to release. 3. There are few of bugs in Checkstyle report but they are non-blocker to release. 4. Hashes given in files

Re: [lang][collections] SortedProperties

My opinion is this should go to *lang* because the fact is it's extended utility and not exactly as data structures though it looks like one. It's main purpose is to hold properties and not the data. Commons collection aims to provide utlilities and extension to data structures and not to

Re: [daemon] moving to git ? and bump java version.

he modern front, it'd be interesting if it were written in Rust, > though > > I don't know enough about the language to say if it's worth porting to > > eventually. > > > > On 15 July 2017 at 09:26, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 15 July 20

Re: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

the > most work). > > Cheers, > Pascal > > Am 14.07.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Amey Jadiye: > > Hello Pascal, > > > > Thanks for putting this on table, I too think that users need some short > > code to show up output really quick. > > > > How about this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC1

Build and Tests are passing clean, clirr and rat looks good. there are few of bugs in findbug and checkstyle report but they are non-blocker to release. hashes looks good. site looks fine. Here is my +1 to release (non-binding) Checked on :- Apache Maven 3.3.9

  1   2   >