Done.
On 04/25/2016 09:05 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:54:53 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
>> 61c53a4 contains my updates after releasing 3.6.1
>
> Could you please make sure that the most up-to-date procedure
> is in the "develop" branch?
>
> Thanks,
&
61c53a4 contains my updates after releasing 3.6.1
Best Regards,
Evan
On 04/22/2016 08:30 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Contents of
> doc/release/release.howto.txt
> is different in branches "develop" and "MATH_3_X".
>
> Which one is correct?
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
>
I'm not sure if this is the problem, but a good rule of thumb is that if
you have pushed a commit you should merge it instead of rebasing it. It
looks to me like 6ddf476 and ce8c82f are the same, so I think when you
ran rebase it put it on top of the bug fix I pushed up recently,
duplicating the
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of:
Apache Commons Math 3.6.1
Apache Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained
mathematics and statistics components addressing the most common
problems not available in the Java programming language or Commons Lang.
03/22/2016 09:59 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:14:41 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 03/21/2016 07:32 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm on step 19 in Release.howto.txt, I've committed the updated site
>>> using
Hi,
I'm on step 19 in Release.howto.txt, I've committed the updated site
using svn, but I get a 404 when I try to view it at
http://commons.staging.apache.org/proper/commons-math
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I've noticed that the staging URL for
other components such as [lang] or [io] also
Thanks Luc!
On 03/21/2016 11:48 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 21/03/2016 13:54, Evan Ward a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can a Math PMC member add our release data to the database? I don't have
>> the necessary permissions.
> Now that we have 3 PMC, I have updated th
On 03/21/2016 09:18 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 21/03/2016 13:44, Evan Ward a écrit :
>> The vote passes with three votes in favor and none against.
> Well, in fact I am not sure it passes yet ...
>
> As far as I know, there are only 2 PMC members who voted: Oliver and mys
Hi,
Can a Math PMC member add our release data to the database? I don't have
the necessary permissions.
Thanks,
Evan
Forwarded Message
Subject:Please add your release data for 'commons'
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:48:51 +
From: Apache Reporter Service
gt;> but this is not blocking.
>>
>> So +1
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Am 17.03.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Evan Ward:
>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.6.1 from release
>>> candidate 1.
>>>
>>> Tag name:
>>> M
On 03/17/2016 03:06 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.6.1 from
> release candidate 1.
>
>
>
> Tag name:
>
> MATH_3_6_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag
> -v')
>
&
On 03/16/2016 05:18 PM, luc wrote:
> Le 2016-03-16 20:13, Evan Ward a écrit :
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Evan,
>
>>
>> First, I'm trying to use the new branching strategy so I would
>> appreciate your patience if I'm not doing correctly.
>>
>> I'v
Hi,
First, I'm trying to use the new branching strategy so I would
appreciate your patience if I'm not doing correctly.
I've commited a fix for MATH-1342 in commit 7a8dc00. This is a problem
with event detection in all ODE integrators. So if the list approves I
would like to merge this into the
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.6.1 from release
candidate 1.
Tag name:
MATH_3_6_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
Tag URL:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=tag;h=e40b144832c0e138b185c92326588a087e00909c
Commit ID
Hi Ole,
On 02/05/2016 06:40 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2016 04:42 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
>> Yes, I use it. In some cases it is useful to watch the RMS residuals
> So if it were modularized and supported logging then this might
> satisfy the same requirement?
I'm not
Yes, I use it. In some cases it is useful to watch the RMS residuals, in
other cases to watch the change in the states. I think it is there from
an acknowledgement that we can't enumerate all possible convergence
criteria, so we provide a way for the user to define their own.
Regards,
Evan
On
I would prefer Apache Epsilon or Apache Math.
-Evan
On 02/01/2016 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
From an API perspective we can design a functional programming API in
Java 7, it will just be more verbose than in Java 8. One unique feature
that Java 8 does bring is multiple inheritance. Now that interfaces can
have method implementations classes can inherit methods from multiple
super classes.
Hi,
A while ago I had bought up the idea of adding residual editing (aka data
editing, outlier rejection, robust regression) to our non-linear least
squares implementations.[1] As the name suggests, the idea is to de-weight
observations that don't match the user's model. There are several ways to
from
Gary Gregory Thomas Niedhart Evan Ward Gilles Sadowski
(changed from -1 to +1) * Luc Maisonobe Venkatesha M
+0 from Benedikt Ritter
and no other votes.
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
.
For non-linear least squares you already need an accurate initial guess,
though I could see the convergence region being different between the
two methods. Have you tried it?
Best Regards,
Evan
Thanks,
Olexiy
-Original Message-
From: Evan Ward [mailto:evan.w...@nrl.navy.mil]
Sent
, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi Olexiy,
In my field we often encounter a similar problem when estimating
attitude since a quaternion is only a valid rotation when it is
normalized. We often escape this issue by estimating a small
adjustment to an apriori guess. (For the details see [1
the point to a list for later
retrieval. What do you think?
Best Regards,
Evan
On 09/08/2014 11:13 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:56:36 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Gilles,
I like this approach. My only thought is that a separate interface
for
the validate method would
On 09/08/2014 12:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:50:43 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
I was suggesting (though not clearly :) keeping the
MultivariateJacobianFunction interface as is and adding a new interface
for any post processing of the evaluated point.
Isn't it rather pre
Hi Olexiy,
In my field we often encounter a similar problem when estimating
attitude since a quaternion is only a valid rotation when it is
normalized. We often escape this issue by estimating a small
adjustment to an apriori guess. (For the details see [1].) For this
technique to work the cost
+1
Evan
On 07/22/2014 03:16 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/22/2014 07:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like other projects are running VOTEs to ensure there is
consensus for this action and including references to VOTE threads
in INFRA JIRAs. Lets do this. The action I am proposing is
On 05/30/2014 05:56 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 00:39, Mark Thomas a écrit :
On 29/05/2014 23:16, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup write access for the clone I have of the github
[math] repository. I thought that since every commit in that repository
already had a git
Hi,
I'm trying to setup write access for the clone I have of the github
[math] repository. I thought that since every commit in that repository
already had a git-svn-id it would be relatively easy, so I ran git svn
init and git svn fetch. But the fetch has been running for ~5 hours now
and seems
Hi Thomas,
I noticed that the user guide is using deprecated classes in the
examples for least squares optimization. Do we want to update the user
guide to help new users find/understand the new API?
Best Regards,
Evan
On 04/29/2014 04:07 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to
. In any case, we
should discuss on the ML.
Least squares statistical data editing
--
Key: MATH-1105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1105
Project: Commons Math
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Evan Ward
Attachments: 0001-Add-statistical
On 02/24/2014 05:47 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:41:34 -0500, Evan Ward wrote:
On 02/24/2014 01:23 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:49:26 -0500, Evan Ward wrote:
One way to improve performance would be to provide pre-allocated space
for the Jacobian and reuse it for each
I've looked into improving performance further, but it seems any further
improvements will need big API changes for memory management.
Currently using Gauss-Newton with Cholesky (or LU) requires 4 matrix
allocations _each_ evaluation. The objective function initially
allocates the Jacobian
On 02/24/2014 01:23 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:49:26 -0500, Evan Ward wrote:
One way to improve performance would be to provide pre-allocated space
for the Jacobian and reuse it for each evaluation.
Do you have actual data to back this statement?
I did some tests
On 02/24/2014 02:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
One way to improve performance would be to provide
pre-allocated space
for the Jacobian and reuse it for each
On Thu 20 Feb 2014 08:34:19 AM EST, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:05:58 +0100, luc wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking more precisely at the least squares package and have a
few adjustments to propose.
The Evaluation interface declares a computeValue and a
computeJacobian method
On 02/18/2014 09:51 AM, luc wrote:
Hi all,
As you have probably noticed, I have committed the changes proposed by
Evan. This ends up to about 20 different commits,
as I have tried to stick with the progressive changes he made in his
Github repository. Some of the initial commits
do not
On 02/13/2014 12:19 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello Luc.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:10:36 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Le 08/02/2014 22:16, Gilles a écrit :
Other issues to be discussed:
* [MATH-1008]
a new package has been created o.a.c.m.fitting.leastsquares which
contains
Hi John,
I've attached my form.
Thanks,
Evan
On Wed 18 Sep 2013 09:23:10 PM EDT, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
True, maybe with EachElement and a Procedure [1], or maybe
IteratorToGeneratorAdapter, or something similar to the
ArrayListBackedAggregator and some custom function :) Or maybe with
Hi Luc,
On Mon 16 Sep 2013 12:04:21 PM EDT, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hello,
I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
It seems to be well suited for the needs, and would allow a better
separation of the integrator engine and the integrator state. The
engine will
On 08/27/2013 07:27 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Sorry but the _main_ question of my previous post was...
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:35:51 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi again,
I rearranged the least squares
On 08/26/2013 03:11 PM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
I looked only at the GuassNewton class as a general guide to how
things work. I like it a lot! I only wish all of the optimizations
were rewritten in this way.
Several comments
1) I believe this code can now be simplified
// build the
On 08/27/2013 08:44 AM, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/27/2013 07:27 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Sorry but the _main_ question of my previous post was...
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:35:51 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi
Using https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2.diff and `patch -p1
2.diff` worked for me. (On top of svn r1517789)
I've also attached the modified files to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1026
Regards,
Evan
On Tue 27 Aug 2013 12:35:48 PM EDT, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug
On 08/27/2013 12:35 PM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. I was suggesting, like
you are pointing out, that you make a newton step function explicit
inside the optimizer. I think it is a good idea that this function is
explicit in all optimizers, so it can
Hi again,
I rearranged the least squares package and I've posted the results.[1]
I've also created a pull request[2] and an associated issue.[3]
[1] https://github.com/wardev/commons-math/tree/sepOpt
[2] https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/1
[3]
On 08/26/2013 03:33 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:59:32 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
Hi again,
I rearranged the least squares package and I've posted the results.[1]
I've also created a pull request[2] and an associated issue.[3]
[1] https://github.com/wardev/commons-math/tree/sepOpt
On 08/21/2013 06:00 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:23:52 + (UTC), Evan Ward (JIRA) wrote:
Evan Ward created MATH-1024:
---
Summary: LU and QR have different default singularity
thresholds
Key: MATH-1024
I agree with James that this is a problem that git has already solved.
For the changes I'm working on I have already cloned from the git
mirror and plan to upload the patch as a fork + pull request on github.
I think the branchyness of distributed version control makes it easy
to have several
Hi all,
Sorry for the delay. I'll try switching all of the least squares package
to the new/seperable API and post the results to github. From there we
can review, discuss and then decide if it makes sense to switch the rest
of the optimizers.
On 08/15/2013 09:12 AM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:30 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:47:18 -0400, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/13/2013 08:17 AM, Gilles wrote:
(I.e. GN would
not need 5 superclasses and fields for storing upper and lower
bounds.)
Be careful: GaussNewtonOptimizer does _not_ support bounds!
That is my
Hi,
On 08/14/2013 12:23 PM, Konstantin Berlin wrote:
Since I have no idea what you guys are describing, could you guys please
do something like this? Or at least put rough outlines of the interfaces
and classes somewhere, so other people can evaluate?
The *rough* interfaces and classes of my
On 08/13/2013 08:17 AM, Gilles wrote:
(I.e. GN would
not need 5 superclasses and fields for storing upper and lower bounds.)
Be careful: GaussNewtonOptimizer does _not_ support bounds!
That is my point! Because of it's complex inheritance every instance
includes fields for storing bounds
On 08/09/2013 06:55 PM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
This does make it important to decide on a well written and
complete API before releasing it.
When the scope of the software is well circumscribed, that would be
possible. With the whole of [Math]ematics, much less so. :-}
And state-of-the-art
On 08/12/2013 12:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 8/12/13 9:04 AM, Evan Ward wrote:
On 08/09/2013 06:55 PM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
This does make it important to decide on a well written and
complete API before releasing it.
When the scope of the software is well circumscribed, that would
Hi again,
Sorry for the confusion my code sample caused; it made sense in my mind.
:) I was speaking from the perspective that an abstract class is a
skeletal implementation of an interface, created so that implementing
the interface is easier. For the non-linear least squares (NLLS) package
I
Gilles wrote:
To address a few concerns I saw,
Gilles wrote:
In this way, it does not; what I inferred from the partial code
above was
that there would only be _one_ create method. But:
1. All create methods must be overridden at the next level of the
class
hierarchy (this is the
Hi,
As a grateful user of the library, I would prefer the Fluent API and
immutability. I have implemented this pattern in some of my own projects
and it makes the API very easy to use.
Most of the time, when the interface is small, inheritance isn't really
necessary and I just implement the
57 matches
Mail list logo
