still has
privileges graned, anyone can call its methods and we're back to square one.
Glad to be proven wrong...
Matt
LieGrue,
strub
From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.comwrote:
Hi Greg,
the pattern matches (also) a single space that gets replaced by a single
space. Therefor are most of the actual performed replacements completely
superfluous, since I expect this to be the common case.
Committed revision 1407536.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
wrote:
Hi Greg,
the pattern matches (also) a single space that gets replaced by a single
space. Therefor
I think we're mostly good, but just to make sure there's no confusion:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Matt,
Matt Benson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.comwrote:
Hi Greg,
the pattern
Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
- line separator concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
system property, might be better represented as row separator so as
not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or
\n . I would think the default
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
- line separator concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
system
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
Why
Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
accordingly?
Matt
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
$0.02,
Matt
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:15 PM, ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Wed Oct 3 19:15:27 2012
New Revision:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com wrote:
On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com wrote:
On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a minor bug in CP 26; the site plugin report version was
different from the build version.
This has been fixed, and various other plugin versions updated.
I'd like to do another release soon to fix the bug.
Just before I
+1 for Java 6 as well.
Matt
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
+1 to upgrade to Java 6.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I am prototyping the Jackson support as described in CHAIN-76
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:40 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2012 16:21, ki...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kinow
Date: Mon Jul 23 15:21:25 2012
New Revision: 1364676
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364676view=rev
Log:
[FUNCTOR-22] Added generics to ComparableComparator.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 23, 2012, at 21:19, Damjan Jovanovic dam...@apache.org wrote:
It's been 3 years since Imaging 0.97 was released,
and many bugs have
+1 to all FWIW
Matt
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Olá Bruno,
0) I would like to add the method Validate.notNull(...) where necessary in
[functor], if no one objects. Right now, I'm working on the following
composite functors:
If Scott were an Apache committer (he is not), that would be true. ;)
Instead, the situation is more complicated. Is this component part
of the current Camel codebase? If so (or even if not?), perhaps one
or more of the Camel committers would care to manage the code in the
Commons sandbox,
+1, delete
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:50 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
renamed to IMAGING.
Just for the sake of multiple choice, what about:
- keyedBy
- keyedTo
- withKey
- of
- at
?
Matt
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
LOL indeed :)
go for your proposed solution, sounds nice anyway :)
alles gute,
-Simo
I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
bringing along everything. Does anyone have any feelings on further
subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful?
Matt
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:42 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
All,
When trying to test some of the utility classes (such as
DuckTypinginvoker), it would be useful to have a ProxyFactory to play
with. However, in core, we don't have access to one since they've
been broken
Hi, Mark! This is why I was confused when we touched on this on
IRC--I was thinking that the correct handling of URLs was an
orthogonal function to [classscan]'s *use* of those same URLs, for
this reason. I had thought there had been, at one time, an OSS Java
project to help manage these
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Actually, that cast should not be necessary. Try
return AnnotationFactory.AnnotationgetStubType();
Seems reasonable, Adrian, but still poppped a compile error. Thanks anyway! ;)
Matt
-Adrian
On
AFAIK there is a Sonar instance available for ASF use. Hit up Gerhard
(os890) on IRC and he can probably tell you how to get it set up.
Matt
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:19 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
All,
I've really become fond of Sonar (http://www.sonarsource.org/) in
. Kinoshita
http://www.kinoshita.eti.br
http://www.tupilabs.com
On 06/05/2012 11:52 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Hi, Bruno. Likewise, answers inline:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi Matt!
Thanks for your response! Answers added inline.
1
Hi all,
David had mentioned an IRC conversation that had taken place. This
did indeed transpire; the results of said conversation have been
summarized at [1]. The channel has not been registered yet, but
remains open as #asfcommons on freenode. Feel free to join us there,
or rest assured that
BCEL with asm, but we might
need to support additional URL types. (I'm sure we're going to need to
support the JBoss vfs URLs) Plugging in URL providers may be smaller than a
multi-module project.
Regards,
chas
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com
Hi, Bruno!
I have some questions:
1. Why are a Range's type and step-type potentially different
(different type variables, etc.)?
2. Why, if it is a Generator's responsibility to generate items
subsequent to the lower endpoint, is the step part of the range at
all? Based on [1], which
to be dependent
upon xbean-finder or vice versa? What functionality will be required from
the dependency?
xbean-finder could be plugged in as an alternative to your existing
bcel-based MetaRegistry implementation.
Matt
Thanks,
chas
On 6/5/12 7:26 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote
Welcome, David!
Matt
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:07 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding a branch of xbean-finder for experimentation in what it might look
like to break it apart and abstract out ASM and other bits.
Just playing, no obligation or expectation this will go
/Interval_(mathematics)
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://www.kinoshita.eti.br
http://www.tupilabs.com
On 06/05/2012 12:08 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Hi, Bruno!
I have some questions:
1. Why are a Range's type and step-type potentially different
(different type variables, etc.)?
2. Why
Can anyone provide a reason [classscan] should not simply use
slf4j-simple in the test scope rather than logback? It's a small
change, but any reduction in complexity...
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I propose that we, in the immediate future, reorganize [classscan]
into multiple modules. I fully expect that by the time we get
everyone's input/features/alternative implementations for X/Y/Z in
place, we will want the flexibility. I am fine with starting small,
e.g. core/bcel modules, although
Oddly, I had this problem, but on the second try the build worked. :|
Matt
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I pointed my local Jenkins/Sonar setup at classscan at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/classscan/trunk
It's failing
Hello all,
As Charles has been recently voted in as a Commons committer by
virtue of his other contributions to Commons components
(congratulations!), he is now free to import his work into the
[classscan] sandbox repo as a base for the rest of us to start
stuffing features. ;P
Regarding IP: I
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi all,
While I am still trying to find time to work on a proposal for enhancements
in the generators API in [functor]
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FUNCTOR-14), I'm reviewing other
pending
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi all,
While I am still trying to find time to work on a proposal
Agreed; there are any number of things the PMC needs to agree upon
here. WRT the name: trying to reconstruct the past, I think Mark and
I must have just agreed offline to call the community work [classscan]
based on his classscanner name. I lean here, but could possibly be
persuaded to
I see your ICLA has now come through. ;)
Matt
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chas,
Thanks for getting the repo back into a nicer state. Does this
codebase actually have any common pedigree with [meiyo] (seemingly
no)? The answer would dictate
Hi Chas,
Thanks for getting the repo back into a nicer state. Does this
codebase actually have any common pedigree with [meiyo] (seemingly
no)? The answer would dictate how, if indeed, we move forward with
it; personally I think there is value here especially in that you
already account for
Actually, on this subject, I was able to establish on the
legal-discuss ML recently that code authored entirely by an existing
committer, even if it has been exposed on e.g. github, needs no
formal SG to be incorporated into an ASF codebase. Sorry for having
pushed for this in the case of
Sounds good, Bruno. Can you file/attach in JIRA?
Matt
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi all,
The test class o.a.c.functor.TestAlgorithms contains tests for several
algorithms (Retain Matching, Remove Matching, Predicated Loop, among
Hi David,
[collections] has had generics in its trunk for years, but none of
its developers, myself included, have had time to get this rather
large codebase fully ready for a release. In any event, the general
idea in Commons is that [collections]' functor code is
semi-deprecated; we will
I have to agree with James here. However, if the mysterious
team-who-wishes-to-contribute is dead set on 6 month release cycles,
it is certainly within their power to make sure 4.5 months ahead of
time that every open JIRA issue has a patch attached, and to nag the
team incessantly for the
The votes show that several of us in the Commons community are leaning
more and more toward fluent APIs these days. But rather than wasting
time going back and forth arguing about it, why not build the fluent
API separately from the rest of the package and leave the choice up to
the user? I
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
In langs StringEscapeUtils are some static methods marked with
final... it makes no sense to me to do that. I would like to remove
the final keywords. Any objections? not sure if this breaks bc (cannot
imagine)
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2012 23:41, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2012 22:06, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
The vote to promote Commons CSV to Commons proper has passed with 13 +1:
Christian Grobmeier +1
Damjan Jovanovic
(lost group)
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 March 2012 14:44, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2012 23
As the original creator of [flatfile] it would be interesting to see
how difficult it would be to make [flatfile] do any of the things that
[csv] can currently do; e.g. [flatfile] can already handle a delimited
column structure.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Simone Tripodi
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I, or can someone please tell Gump to use slf4j 1.5.5 and not
whatever is laying about?
Doesn't that run counter to the very purpose of Gump?
Matt
Thank you,
Gary
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Gump
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Benedict,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
finally I've found the time to answer to this topic :) We had a similar
discussion a while ago [1]. Back then James suggested to drop
collections completely in favor of
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the hint. Maybe I gave too little context to my question. I
wasn't trying to add something to MultiMapK, V. It is checked in this way
in the repo. So I guess get(K key) in MultiMap will never work
Listdev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 24 de Janeiro de 2012 18:30
Assunto: Re: [functor] CharacterRange, FloatRange, DoubleRange and
open/closed intervals
On 1/24/2012 8:15 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for your interest, Adrian! Comments inline:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012
Guys, if I know which magic numbers you are discussing, I believe they
are intended to allow a weight to be assigned to the action of
calling a given method(or constructor) with a given set of parameters:
the smaller the weight, the more directly assignable the parameters
are to the method being
, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 30.01.2012 23:21, schrieb Matt Benson:
Guys, if I know which magic numbers you are discussing, I believe they
are intended to allow a weight to be assigned to the action
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:37 AM, stefan.albre...@icw.de wrote:
Hi,
I stumbled over the BasicTypeConverter
(org.apache.commons.jxpath.util.BasicTypeConverter.java)
Within this class the BeanUtils ConvertUtils class is used for looking up
a matching converter. This is done by only supplying
Whew... I hope you guys love me. :P I decided to take a look just
because I've had to play with Eclipse before on issues like this.
What I typically find is that Eclipse has a sane reason for
complaining where it does. This time I *really* thought Eclipse was
wrong... but check this out:
In
kind help, always much more than appreciated!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Whew... I hope you guys love
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
But i found only discussions about duration joda-time dated 2004.
(http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j)
Now i really need
as documentation in the project website too.
Thanks for your ongoing interest,
Matt
Thank you Matt!
All the best,
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
- Mensagem original -
De: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
Para: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Thanks for your interest, Adrian! Comments inline:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
On 1/24/2012 6:58 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
IMO the difference between [lang]'s and [functor]'s range concepts is that
those in [lang] are intended
Hi, Bruno; my thoughts inline...
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi all,
In functor, there are two ranges available: IntegerRange and LongRange. Both
use a closed open interval, i.e., the low limit is included in the range,
while the
the best!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
All who took interest in this discussion three months ago (and still
:
* Matt Benson
* Simone Tripodi (implicit)
no other votes were cast.
We will continue working towards a new RC to submit.
Thanks to all for your support and patience!
Have a nice weekend, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http
Also, if you're interested in predicate-based APIs for filtering
Iterables, check out the FilteredIterable class in Commons' unreleased
[functor] component.
Matt
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:50 AM, James Ring s...@jdns.org wrote:
I agree, I'm just saying you should seriously study the design of
Thanks for getting this straightened out, Damjan!
Matt
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:44 AM, dam...@apache.org wrote:
Author: damjan
Date: Sun Jan 8 06:44:49 2012
New Revision: 1228802
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1228802view=rev
Log:
Deleted a test that's wrong by design.
The
Ping, any of the sanselan/imaging guys want to tackle this?
Matt
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 21/12/2011 13:49, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Sorry, that kind of feels like passing the buck here ;) I wish I could
recall a French equivalent! :)
Yeah
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for renaming
What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to prefer
the plural form.
Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more appropriate.
Matt
Emmanuel Bourg
Le
The copy of cglib source I have locally includes an AL2.
Matt
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2011 12:21, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
actually I
I think all that Sebastian is saying is something like if you can
create your new, cool API and the only things you really miss from
Java 6 are @Override on interface implementation methods and
ServiceLoader, for example, maybe it's worth that tiny bit of extra
pain to reach that slightly larger
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think all that Sebastian is saying is something like if you can
create your new, cool API and the only things you really miss from
Java 6
Note that in the testcase XML you don't need @params if you're using
the (boolean, double) constructor. The default constructor arguments
were needed to avoid the NPEs that were thrown due to the (Boolean,
Double) constructor calling { this( booleanProperty.booleanValue(),
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 28/11/2011 21:33, Erhan Bagdemir a écrit :
Apache JCA
Java CSV API :-)
It is a very cool approach to use annotations for mapping CSV fields with
beans.
It can be even configured using a class annotation like this:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Henri Biestro hbies...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm obviously unfit as RM.
I do not think so.
+1. I've only done the RM thing once, because it's such a PITA to get
things right. This is
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
[SNIP]
The other idea relates to the bean mapping feature. CSVFormat could be
generified and work on annotated classes. I imagine something like this:
public class Person {
@CSVField(trim = true)
/annotations.html
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote
://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
wrote:
[SNIP]
The other idea relates to the bean mapping feature. CSVFormat could be
generified
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Erhan Bagdemir
erhan.bagde...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I think that it's a project which seems to be discontinued.
The last reply on Jira is from August.
Maybe they do need some contribution support from newcomers :-)
I assure you, the Bean
Sorry, I missed this. I've done something like this before. Ping me
in a few days. :)
Matt
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi James!
many thanks in advance!!! All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:47 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2011 06:21, bay...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Thu Nov 24 06:20:59 2011
New Revision: 1205734
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205734view=rev
Log:
Adding Henning's GitHub pull request with a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Applied.
Scratching my head a bit to see where on the GitHub site you find the
link to the .patch file; I hunted for that and ended up using c+p
(hadn't seen this email).
Good to see that we're getting notified when a
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys!!!
Flat file is what it is. Gary
We already have a sandbox component named [flatfile][1]!
We certainly do, and it can do much of what a CSV component should.
;) I would be interested in augmenting
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Adrian!
nice to see you involved here!
So, I took few time to reorganize my ideas and I would like to discuss
with you how to make a new [convert] component,.
For what I can see, the bigger part of the
:)
Hi, Simo. At one time I wanted to incubate
http://morph.sourceforge.net/ @ Commons. Then [convert] seemed to
start to take off again, though not necessarily in a direction I fully
approved. Next I decided Morph needed a rewrite with generics, but
never got around to starting on the job.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
upon for a 0.1 as current release?
Yes, or a
Thanks for your help, Seb!
Matt
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:49 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Fri Oct 21 08:49:51 2011
New Revision: 1187217
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187217view=rev
Log:
No longer in Sandbox
Modified:
commons/proper/functor/trunk/pom.xml
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit :
The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate.
It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a
basic interface in a different way. So
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functor-1.0
based on RC1.
The vote will stay open for 72 hours and closes on Sunday 23th, at 5:40pm CET.
Many thanks in advance for
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Peter Firmstone
peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au wrote:
I've just realised the code probably isn't a good fit with commons
collections, primarily because it utilises Generics.
There is a branch that supports generics, just not enough love to
finish it for a release.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
there are classes in [functor] that are affected by the checkstyle
violation as reported in the subject.
That behavior is expected by design, as reported in the comment below
/**
* p{@code
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in
@since 3.0? Should this be 2.0? :) Same for previous commit to this...
Matt
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Mon Sep 5 19:07:51 2011
New Revision: 1165395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1165395view=rev
Log:
added
Obviously I've suggested this auto-cast or
whatever-you'd-like-to-call-it trick elsewhere, and am in favor of its
use.
Matt
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:39 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Yeah, I tried that sort of setup with the ArrayUtils.toMap() method
and it was shot down
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:02 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2011 20:04, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
the clirr report has just been updated on my personal ASF space[1],
can you review please?
As it stands, 2.0 is not strictly binary compatible
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
wrote:
That is able to 'auto-cast' the retrieved object while Map#get() not.
I believe the feature is actually called type inference, not
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again guys,
I did a little work on the v2 branch of [chain] to fix checkstyle
errors, obviously clirr[1] errors increased but new ones are IMHO
trivial, since concern internal data structures already exposed via
, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am generally in favor. I think it could be good to apply his patch
on a branch so we can discuss the clirr results and agree on the
severity of the (IMHO forgivable) backward-compatibility breaches.
Then we will understand
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2011 13:40, mben...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mbenson
Date: Tue Aug 30 12:40:45 2011
New Revision: 1163189
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163189view=rev
Log:
remove wonky character from project name
BTW,
401 - 500 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
