On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:36 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
In which case, vetoing the commit that causes the problem makes more
sense, surely?
Perhaps we should set up a Sonar rule to catch stuff like this to save you the
trouble of trolling the SVN commit log messages.
The veto was
Hi All:
It seems to me that we are misusing the term veto. A release cannot be
vetoes, it can be VOTEd on with a -1, which is not a veto, but is usually
interpreted as one, by me, at least, as a courtesy to my fellow PMD member
for putting the time in to care.
You can -1 a commit which is not
A -1 on a code modification proposal (in this case the code was already
changed, but i think it still applies) is called a veto by the ASF. If
accompanied by a valid technical justification, it stands (unless the
person can be talked out of it).
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On
On Mar 9, 2013, at 7:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have voted -1 on the RC, because the tag would not agree with
the source archive.
However, releases cannot be vetoed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 12 March 2013 11:17, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2013, at 7:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have voted -1 on the RC, because the tag would not agree with
the source archive.
However, releases cannot be vetoed.
In which case, vetoing the commit
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the requested change is made then all should be fine with the world
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the
On 9 March 2013 11:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 11:56, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what
2013/3/9 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit
and identified exactly what needed to be
Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
snip/
One of the primary responsibilities of a PMC member when voting on a
release is verifying what is being voted on against the tag.
Different
client locales and $Date$
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the requested change is made then all should be fine with the world again.
Sure, he could have said all the same words without the -1 but then
13 matches
Mail list logo
