Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On 10 Oct 2013, at 18:43, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi James, James Carman wrote: Sorry, didn't understand your question. The Apache Camel team uses Git and they release maintenance versions all the time (I believe about 3 or 4 at a time sometimes when a bug fix gets merged down). Here's a

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 I consider this move to happen step by step and see only little risk if we start with a single component first. As the half of the world works with git meanwhile I see less risk in general too. On 10 Oct 2013, at 16:41, James Carman wrote: All, We have had some great discussions

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-11 Thread Ted Dunning
I hate myself a bit for jumping in here, but as much as I prefer git, I really don't think that changing will make that much difference. The problem with commons is that people have much more energy for interminable conversations about things that don't much matter (like this thread). People who

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On 11 Oct 2013, at 15:28, Ted Dunning wrote: I hate myself a bit for jumping in here, but as much as I prefer git, I really don't think that changing will make that much difference. Well, obviously I think it matters (see my other threads). The problem with commons is that people have much

[VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1 - no, do not move to Git The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! James

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
Here's my +1 (binding) On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:41 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1 - no, do not move to Git The vote

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/10/10 James Carman

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:41:11 -0400, James Carman wrote: All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1 - no, do not move to Git -1 Some people have indicated that this move might not

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
I'm going to start another thread. For me, in gmail, this got combined with the [DISCUSS] thread and I don't want votes to get lost. Consider this [VOTE] canceled! Romain, please vote again in the other thread. Sorry, folks. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:41 AM, James Carman

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Gilles: that's right (and I'm part of people thinking this is not the main issue) but everybody seems happy to use git instead of svn so let's go *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog:

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Could you please restart the thread with a [VOTE] in the subject? Gary On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:41 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes,

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/10/2013 16:49, James Carman a écrit : I'm going to start another thread. For me, in gmail, this got combined with the [DISCUSS] thread and I don't want votes to get lost. Consider this [VOTE] canceled! Romain, please vote again in the other thread. Sorry, folks. At least in

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/10/2013 16:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : Could you please restart the thread with a [VOTE] in the subject? There is one though: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg40574.html Emmanuel Bourg - To

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
James Carman wrote: All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1 - no, do not move to Git The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! James -1 We have to ensure before

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
The ASF has already set up official support for Git for their projects. These technical details have already been worked out. There are MANY other projects using Git already (around 1/3 I believe). On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote: James Carman

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote: James Carman wrote: All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1 - no, do not move to Git The vote

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
How is that any different than SVN? We have to release from branches with SVN too. We don't copy our maintenance branches to trunk in order to do releases. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jörg Schaible

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
Sorry, didn't understand your question. The Apache Camel team uses Git and they release maintenance versions all the time (I believe about 3 or 4 at a time sometimes when a bug fix gets merged down). Here's a list of the current projects using Git: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf On

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: -1 Some people have indicated that this move might not address the problem it is supposed to. No conclusive answer has been provided. What problem is that exactly? Perhaps that's not well understood?

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Great point. Sounds like someone needs to experiment and show that it can be done. Since James started the vote,, perhaps he'd care to pick one Commons component and try to release through git... How about this?

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:01 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Great point. Sounds like someone needs to experiment and show that it can be done. Since James started the vote,, perhaps he'd care to

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi James, James Carman wrote: Sorry, didn't understand your question. The Apache Camel team uses Git and they release maintenance versions all the time (I believe about 3 or 4 at a time sometimes when a bug fix gets merged down). Here's a list of the current projects using Git:

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1   Bruno P. Kinoshita http://kinoshita.eti.br http://tupilabs.com - Original Message - From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:41 AM Subject: [VOTE] Moving to Git... All, We

Re: [VOTE] Moving to Git...

2013-10-10 Thread James Carman
...@carmanconsulting.com To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:41 AM Subject: [VOTE] Moving to Git... All, We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: +1 - yes, move to Git -1