Thank you for your thoughtful explanation.
I'm 100% ok with calling the RC 1.0-alpha4 (alpha3 is was 2 years ago).
I'll re-roll the RC in the morning.
Gary
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 6:07 PM Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> The M name is something Maven uses a lot and (to me) suggests
Hi Gary,
The M name is something Maven uses a lot and (to me) suggests something
> users might be more willing to try than anything labeled alpha or beta.
> YMMV of course.
Now that you mention it, I do remember installing some Maven versions that
had the M in its version!
>From a
Hi Bruno,
The M name is something Maven uses a lot and (to me) suggests something
users might be more willing to try than anything labeled alpha or beta.
YMMV of course.
>From a compatibility POV, anything can happen until 1.0, so the only name
that matters is 1.0. We have no guidelines except
Will try the branch and vote later this week.
>From another thread, I think M1 will behave exatcly like an alpha release
would.
I am more used to alpha/beta/then final release process.
Could you clarify how the M1 will distinguish from an alpha or 1.0 release?
Tha ks for preparing the release!
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha3 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-M1.
Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-M1 RC1 is available for review here:
