On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site
on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the
Hi again guys,
I did a little work on the v2 branch of [chain] to fix checkstyle
errors, obviously clirr[1] errors increased but new ones are IMHO
trivial, since concern internal data structures already exposed via
getters - the o.a.c.chain.impl.ChainBase#commands was exposed at
package level just
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again guys,
I did a little work on the v2 branch of [chain] to fix checkstyle
errors, obviously clirr[1] errors increased but new ones are IMHO
trivial, since concern internal data structures already exposed via
Hi all guys,
I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level,
there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces
methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it?
Moreover, I'd like to propose to split the chain component, for v2.0,
in a multi-module
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level,
there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces
methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I noticed that properly setting the 1.5 as target compliance level,
there are some @Override annotations that in cases of interfaces
methods implementation should be dropped. Do you agree on it?
Yes,
Hi Paul,
if I remember correctly, maven should be able to aggregate submodules
apidocs, I will ask to mvn ML.
Thanks for the feedback and the hint!!!
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Paul
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
if I remember correctly, maven should be able to aggregate submodules
apidocs, I will ask to mvn ML.
Yes, it can. The javadoc plugin has an aggregate option.
Paul
Nice, thanks for the reminder, I'll keep it in mind when splitting the
submodules!!!
At the same time, everybody: do you agree on replacing package.html
with package-info.java?
TIA, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at
At the same time, everybody: do you agree on replacing package.html
with package-info.java?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
thanks!!!
what about dropping deprecated methods? since we are upgrading to
major version, they can be dropped... or not?
TIA!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
At the same time,
Well... I follow this pattern:
http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
thanks!!!
what about dropping deprecated methods? since we are upgrading to
major version, they can be dropped... or not?
TIA!!!
Simo
you reminded me that commons has as well a guideline[1], I need to
read it more carefully! :P
[1] http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry I'm late but looks like my local timezone sometimes doesn't
allow me replying promptly :P
@Matt: you are welcome, any time :) Unfortunately I'm not so familiar
with [chain] codebase, I cannot be useful ATM :(
@Elijah: patches are always welcome ;) For those tests that seems
Hi all guys,
I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site
on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that
Elijah kindly provided.
WDYT? It is IMHO acceptable in order to apply the modifications in /trunk.
TIA, all the best!!!
Simo
[1]
I am curious about the change of normal collections to concurrent
collections. Is there overhead with the concurrent stuff? Most of my
context access is not multithreaded.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I just fixed the clirr report
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site
on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that
Elijah kindly provided.
WDYT? It is IMHO acceptable in order
Hi Simo,
Before we look at releasing the changes (after a trunk merge), I think that
we will need to update the documentation to include Generics and possibly
change the unit tests to use Generics. That said - I'm cautious about
changing the unit tests because they are verifying that the API
18 matches
Mail list logo
