Re: [math] questions on GA

2016-03-21 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:12:11 +0300, Семенов Кирилл wrote: In effect, some time ago we evoked the possibility to drop GA support altogether since the code seemed little used and a lot of work was anticipated for making it useful beyond demo applications. It is rather surprising, that

Re: [math] questions on GA

2016-03-19 Thread Gilles
Hello. On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:11:16 +0300, Семенов Кирилл wrote: Hi, I've been using genetic algorithm for some pet projects. And I'd like to shed some light on a number of topics. Thanks for you interest. Given that there exist Java softwares that seem to provide a more complete

[math] questions on GA

2016-03-19 Thread Семенов Кирилл
Hi, I've been using genetic algorithm for some pet projects. And I'd like to shed some light on a number of topics. 1. Am I correct to think, that now GA is working in a single thread? In such case, was there any discussions on the subject (I didn't find within a quick check of Jira). If not,

Re: [math] questions on GA

2016-03-19 Thread Семенов Кирилл
> > In effect, some time ago we evoked the possibility to drop GA support > altogether since the code seemed little used and a lot of work was > anticipated for making it useful beyond demo applications. It is rather surprising, that ASF doesn't have any complex and extensive AI instruments. I

Re: [math] questions on GA

2016-03-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/18/2016 02:12 PM, Семенов Кирилл wrote: >> >> In effect, some time ago we evoked the possibility to drop GA support >> altogether since the code seemed little used and a lot of work was >> anticipated for making it useful beyond demo applications. > > > It is rather surprising, that ASF