Re: [GSoC] Sandbox project websites

2010-06-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: I think its reasonable to get (sandbox) websites posted for the GSoC projects -- website presence can help draw interest. So, for this year, one would have the sites here:  

Re: [GSoC] Sandbox project websites

2010-06-09 Thread sebb
On 09/06/2010, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: I think its reasonable to get (sandbox) websites posted for the GSoC projects -- website presence can help draw interest. So, for this year, one

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 08/06/2010 23:07, Bill Rossi a écrit : Luc, I'm OK with providing an ICLA or SGA or both. A bit of history on the project to help you decide what is appropriate: While working for my employer some last year we noticed some of these functions were slow. I quickly

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread Bill Rossi
This is my guess as to why this wasn't already done in the language. 1.) Only in recent years with advances in JIT technology and larger processor caches does my approach become feasible. Previously, Java code doing this wouldn't receive the same level of optimization. For example the

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bill Rossi b...@rossi.com wrote: 2.) I also think there there is the perception that the existing methods are good enough, so its probably not a high priority. Fair enough. Have you thought of approaching the folks at the OpenJDK project?

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread Bill Rossi
No it had not occured to me. I can look into that. On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, James Carman wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bill Rossi b...@rossi.com wrote: 2.) I also think there there is the perception that the existing methods are good enough, so its probably not a high priority. Fair

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread James Carman
It seems like Oracle might be a bit more receptive to stuff like this going forward. Good luck! On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Bill Rossi b...@rossi.com wrote: No it had not occured to me.  I can look into that. On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, James Carman wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bill

[scxml-eclipse] Comments in Java code (was: svn commit: r953000)

2010-06-09 Thread Rahul Akolkar
See below: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:41 AM, gu...@apache.org wrote: Author: guixl Date: Wed Jun  9 13:41:14 2010 New Revision: 953000 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=953000view=rev Log: add SCXML document export progress monitor Added:    

Re: [math] elementary functions.

2010-06-09 Thread Bruce A Johnson
Joe Darcy at Oracle http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/category/Numerics might be a good contact as he has an interest and background in Java numerics and has been overseeing Project Coin which is about small additions to the Java language for JDK 7. Bruce On Jun 9, 2010, at 9:31 AM, James

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Comments in Java code (was: svn commit: r953000)

2010-06-09 Thread Xun Long Gui
Sorry about Chinese commend in source code, i will fix it 2010/6/9 Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com See below: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:41 AM, gu...@apache.org wrote: Author: guixl Date: Wed Jun 9 13:41:14 2010 New Revision: 953000 URL:

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Comments in Java code (was: svn commit: r953000)

2010-06-09 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry about Chinese commend in source code, i will fix it snip/ OK, and are you planning on removing the @author tags as well while you are at it? -Rahul 2010/6/9 Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com See below: On

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Comments in Java code (was: svn commit: r953000)

2010-06-09 Thread Xun Long Gui
Yeah 2010/6/9 Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry about Chinese commend in source code, i will fix it snip/ OK, and are you planning on removing the @author tags as well while you are at it? -Rahul

Re: [math] StatUtils handling of zero length arrays - MATH-373

2010-06-09 Thread Ted Dunning
I would count this as a bug fix rather than a compatibility break. (my vote is non-binding, of course) On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net wrote: Currently StatUtils.sum(double []) (as well as most other statistics that operate on arrays) returns NaN on a zero