[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1 Before ages when I wrote the ChangeSet stuff I have marked them as experimental. Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably after 1.4? On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Jörg Schaible
Christian Grobmeier wrote: +1 Before ages when I wrote the ChangeSet stuff I have marked them as experimental. Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably after 1.4? If nobody complained about it until now,

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
The trunk looks good now IMO. I'll let others decide about the change set docs. The only item that stick out but could wait for another release: - the large code dup in BZip2CompressorInputStream as noted by CPD. - the apparently unfinished JarArchiveEntry - unused summary fields in

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31 March 2012 05:48, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Compress' trunk has been sitting on valuable content for too long now: * XZ compression * BZIP2 now reads streams created by pbzip2 (parallel bzip2) * TAR has been largely improved to support reading and writing big

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mar 31, 2012, at 8:30, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 March 2012 05:48, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Compress' trunk has been sitting on valuable content for too long now: * XZ compression * BZIP2 now reads streams created by pbzip2 (parallel bzip2) * TAR has

Re: [Math] On-demand cobertura report

2012-03-31 Thread sebb
On 28 March 2012 17:18, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/28/2012 05:46 PM, sebb wrote: On 28 March 2012 15:46, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: Hello. Please disable the default running of cobertura in mvn site. It is unbearably slow: e.g. on my

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31 March 2012 05:48, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Compress' trunk has been sitting on valuable content for too long now: * XZ compression * BZIP2 now reads streams created by pbzip2 (parallel bzip2) * TAR has been largely improved to support reading and writing big

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Oliver Heger
I had a look at this issue, but could not come to a conclusion. A test case for TestVFSConfigurationBuilder is failing. At first I suspected a recent change in [vfs] would cause the problem. However, I could locally build [configuration] with the recent [vfs] snapshot version without any

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Ralph Goers
I finally went a looked at this. Why in the world did you comment on a Jira issue that is closed and not change its status? No one is going to even look at it. Ralph On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Ralph Goers
I have real problems with Gump. I find it very difficult to determine what the problem actually is much less diagnose it. Other than that I know it is supposed to be using the latest source in trunk it is tough to figure out how to reproduce a problem as it means manually going to all the

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Ralph Goers
From the vfs2 log it looks like it is running into a binary incompatibility with SLF4J. vfs2 is specifying SLF4J 1.5.5 but mvn dependency:tree is showing me that Jackrabbit is referencing jcl-over-slf4j and is using 1.5.3. I've added that to the vfs2 pom in hopes that Gump will honor it. If it

New projects in the Apache Commons

2012-03-31 Thread Tom Everett
Good afternoon everyone. Could someone point me to the process or documentation for proposing and contributing a new project to the Apache Commons? -- A better world shall emerge based on faith and understanding - Douglas MacArthur

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-03-31 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4-testframework (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4-testframework has an issue affecting its community

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-03-31, sebb wrote: There are a few places where the default charset is being used. It's not clear whether these are intentional or not, so I have marked them with TODOs. Thanks (and thanks for the other fixes as well). We should either document that the default is OK, or use a fixed

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-03-31, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Before ages when I wrote the ChangeSet stuff I have marked them as experimental. Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably after 1.4? I must admit I've never used that

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [compress] Releasing 1.4

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-03-31, Gary Gregory wrote: The trunk looks good now IMO. I'll let others decide about the change set docs. The only item that stick out but could wait for another release: - the large code dup in BZip2CompressorInputStream as noted by CPD. I've seen that but must admit I didn't see

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-04-01, Ralph Goers wrote: I have real problems with Gump. I find it very difficult to determine what the problem actually is much less diagnose it. Other than that I know it is supposed to be using the latest source in trunk it is tough to figure out how to reproduce a problem as it

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2012-04-01, Ralph Goers wrote: From the vfs2 log it looks like it is running into a binary incompatibility with SLF4J. vfs2 is specifying SLF4J 1.5.5 but mvn dependency:tree is showing me that Jackrabbit is referencing jcl-over-slf4j and is using 1.5.3. I've added that to the vfs2 pom in

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-03-31 Thread Ralph Goers
On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2012-04-01, Ralph Goers wrote: From the vfs2 log it looks like it is running into a binary incompatibility with SLF4J. vfs2 is specifying SLF4J 1.5.5 but mvn dependency:tree is showing me that Jackrabbit is referencing jcl-over-slf4j