On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category for that component.
If his app _uses_ a Commons component, he is a user of that component.
This kind of users should indeed be encouraged to test snapshots, and
report
problems
+1 to committing.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-884 has a patch to simplify
FastDateFormat which I would like to apply.
OK?
I'm not sure if metacpan is fine, but it has a working link for the package:
https://metacpan.org/source/MSCHWERN/Text-Metaphone-1.96/
Hen
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ron,
Thank you for the report. Can you create a JIRA for this please? Do
+1, looks really nice.
Would like to do the same for the Clusterer interface.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Hi all,
Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer,
Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild
X-Continuum-Project-Id: 71
X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Collections
Online report :
On 4/30/2013 1:32 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:32:24 2013
New Revision: 1477592
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477592
Log:
[CODEC-170] Link broken in Metaphone Javadoc.
Modified:
commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
Fixed and tracked with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-170
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if metacpan is fine, but it has a working link for the
package:
https://metacpan.org/source/MSCHWERN/Text-Metaphone-1.96/
Hen
ah, where?
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
On 4/30/2013 1:32 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:32:24 2013
New Revision: 1477592
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477592
Log:
[CODEC-170] Link
Already in SVN ;)
Thank you sir!
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
implemenations: - implementations:
-Adrian
On 4/30/2013 1:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
ah, where?
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Crum
Hi,
there was a request to change the BSN for commons-logging, which has
already been done LOGGING-151.
Any objections to make a 1.1.3 release which contains only this fix?
Thomas
Le 30/04/2013 15:39, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
there was a request to change the BSN for commons-logging, which has
already been done LOGGING-151.
Any objections to make a 1.1.3 release which contains only this fix?
+1, the BSN in 1.1.2 breaks Eclipse on Debian:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category for that component.
If his app _uses_ a Commons component, he is a user of that
component.
This kind of users should indeed be
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category for that component.
If his app _uses_ a Commons component, he is a user of
On 4/30/13 7:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category for that component.
If his app _uses_ a
On 30 April 2013 15:51, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category for
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
replicated to Maven Central?
Chas
On 4/30/13 8:28 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013 15:51, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Tue,
Le 30/04/2013 17:59, Honton, Charles a écrit :
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
replicated to Maven Central?
I don't know, but nightly builds are already pushed to the snapshot
repository:
On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
one example among others (solvers, integration, ODE and maybe some parts
of statistics may be
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com wrote:
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
replicated to Maven Central?
Not sure that question makes sense as posed.
If a build
On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together
with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released
soon:
* there are no open major issues (most issues are related to cli2)
* no findbugs
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com wrote:
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
replicated to Maven Central?
Not sure that question
Le 30/04/2013 18:42, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
bump, as Emmanuel seems to be active again ;-)
Uh oh, got caught :)
I'll get a look at the latest changes.
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
wrote:
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot
On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
wrote:
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote,
On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
one example among others
On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
wrote:
Is there any
On 30 April 2013 19:03, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
New Revision: 1477744
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
Log:
Add trailing whitespace checkstyle rule.
That's daring!
I've only done the test files so far ...
Modified:
On 4/30/13 10:29 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
On 4/30/13 10:27 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
On 04/30/2013 08:07 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 19:03, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
New Revision: 1477744
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
Log:
Add trailing whitespace checkstyle rule.
That's daring!
I've only done the test files so far
On 30 April 2013 19:12, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 10:27 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
On 30 April 2013 19:25, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/30/2013 08:07 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 19:03, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
New Revision: 1477744
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
Log:
Add trailing
Am 30.04.2013 17:17, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 4/30/13 7:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
developer
category
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/30/13 10:29 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
There are no current warnings in the main code.
However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
suppressed, regardless of whether that is justified or not.
I think this needs to be fixed before a
On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
There are no current warnings in the main code.
However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
suppressed, regardless of whether that is justified or not.
On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
There are no current warnings in the main code.
However, I've just discovered that this is because the
On 04/30/2013 11:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
There are no current warnings in the main code.
However, I've just
On 30 April 2013 22:15, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/30/2013 11:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
I believe the point to this one is that any Closure that accepts a
supertype of T can accept a T argument, so it should be safe to pretend
that the Closure is actually parameterized to accept a T argument.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013
40 matches
Mail list logo
