To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
Salut Emmanuel,
do you have any news? Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
a bientot!!!
It *is* synced (http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/commons-discovery/commons-
discovery/0.5/commons-discovery-0.5.jar), why do you think it is not? Is it
because you
Hi Joerg,
yesterday in the night (my localtime) I joined the #asfinfra IRC
channel and bugged Brian Demers, he noticed that discovery was not
setup to synch; he just restored the synchronization and it should
have been synchronized later.
I haven't had the time to check, that's because I didn't
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the
commons-discovery-0.5 release!
The Apache Commons Discovery component is about discovering, or finding,
implementations for pluggable interfaces.
Changes in this version include:
Fixed Bugs:
o Enumeration in Service class is broken. Issue:
Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
Gary
On May 5, 2011, at 8:26, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the
commons-discovery-0.5 release!
The Apache Commons Discovery component is about discovering, or finding,
Thank you Gary for the help!!!
And a big thank you! goes also to Phil Steiz and Brian Demers,
without them it would have been hard!
Habe a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
snip/
+1 to that sentiment, but not to using reply all and having things
like announce@ on CC (even if it bounces :-).
-Rahul
Gary
On May 5, 2011, at 8:26,
agreed, thanks for pointing it! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations to Simone for
I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be
worth separating dev and user announces too.]
This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always
reference the original e-mail) as well as reducing the reply-all
scatter.
On 5 May 2011 15:27, Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys,
some of us (me included :P) are waiting for pool with generics; now
that the migration has been done, WDYT about releasing a beta1
release?
It is basically the latest pool-1.5.X API, but with generics, at least
we can start playing with it.
Thoughts? Just let me know, I can take care
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. Just give me the generics P L E A S E! :) Change deprecated
documentation from Will be removed in 2.0 to Will be removed in 3.0.
- Next is 3.0: This is
On 5/5/11 8:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
some of us (me included :P) are waiting for pool with generics; now
that the migration has been done, WDYT about releasing a beta1
release?
It is basically the latest pool-1.5.X API, but with generics, at least
we can start playing with
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. Just give me the generics P L E A S E! :) Change deprecated
documentation from Will be removed in 2.0 to Will
On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. Just give me the generics P L E A S E! :) Change deprecated
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. Just give me the generics P L E
On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. Just give me the generics P L E
On 5/5/11 10:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Not from me.
Phil
Mark
-
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8002projectId=73
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 5 May 2011 17:23:04 +
Finished at: Thu 5 May 2011 17:23:19 +
Total time: 14s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit :
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was
introduced in Java 1.4
On 05/05/2011 18:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
On 5/5/11 10:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/05/2011 18:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8004projectId=73
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 5 May 2011 18:22:11 +
Finished at: Thu 5 May 2011 18:22:25 +
Total time: 13s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 5/5/11 10:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Do it! :)
Gary
Mark
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb
On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit :
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in
current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb
Hi all,
looks like I've been causing too much flares! :D
I understand your concerns, anyway, as in the subject, I just proposed
a *2.0-beta1* release, as a first - of many, maybe - intermediate step
before pushing the 2.0.
We could even downgrade it to alpha1, and warning users that APIs can
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
development. I would like to propose that we extend the dormant
classification on the web site to include components that have had
releases. I am not sure whether we need to
On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory
sounds reasonable, +1
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
+1
I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI
frameworks
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/5/11
On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
+1
I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI
frameworks
Or even Commons Digester which IIRC, this stuff preceded.
Phil
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
development. I would like to propose that we extend the dormant
classification on the web site to
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be
worth separating dev and user announces too.]
This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always
reference the original e-mail) as well as
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
44 matches
Mail list logo
