[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

2012-06-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [VFS] Feedback on VFS-422 please

2012-06-22 Thread Mark Fortner
Gary, The S3 provider has an implementation https://github.com/abashev/vfs-s3/tree/master/src/main/java/com/intridea/io/vfs/provider/s3/operations You'd probably need to talk with Mario about specifics. From what I can tell, it's basically an implementation of the Command pattern with the

Re: [VFS] Feedback on VFS-422 please

2012-06-22 Thread Ralph Goers
I'm not sure why SVN support would require the operations stuff. I actually implemented an SVN provider at one point but didn't commit it here due to the svnkit license. Ralph On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Fortner wrote: Gary, The S3 provider has an implementation

Re: [VFS] Feedback on VFS-422 please

2012-06-22 Thread Mark Fortner
I think the idea was to implement functionality that doesn't fit with what File Systems do, in this version control system operations. So that operations like update, commit, revert, etc could be supported. I too, implemented something on top of SVNKit (for an internal project), and another

Re: svn commit: r1351831 - /commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8/

2012-06-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 21.06.2012 18:36, schrieb sebb: On 21 June 2012 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 June 2012 20:25, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb: On 19 June 2012 21:11,ohe...@apache.org wrote: Author: oheger Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012

Re: [VFS] Feedback on VFS-422 please

2012-06-22 Thread Ralph Goers
I ended up adding versioning support for WebDAV without using operations. Now you have me wondering if I should have used it. Ralph On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Mark Fortner wrote: I think the idea was to implement functionality that doesn't fit with what File Systems do, in this version

[configuration] Thoughts about a new version

2012-06-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, there is a request [1] to publish a release of [configuration] which is compatible with the newest version of [lang]. This really makes sense, I am myself in a situation where I have to include [lang] in two versions (2.x and 3.x) due to the dependency to [configuration]. Unfortunately,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jxpath (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-06-22 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This