Le 02/04/2013 22:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.2, based on release
candidate 5.
This vote has passed with the following +1 votes (all are binding votes):
Oliver Heger
Gilles Sadowski
Gary Gregory
LucMaisonobe
Phil Steitz
Thank
Hi,
I was about to remove the explicit unboxing when I noticed this was
actually done on purpose. Why did you add this Sebastian? It pops up as
warnings in my IDE.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/10/2012 18:27, s...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: sebb
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:27:25 2012
New Revision: 1398365
maybe http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-187
can you try with 3.1-SNAPSHOT ?
2013/4/6 Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:19:29 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 5 April 2013 15:17, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
At some recent point, maven started to
On 6 April 2013 04:52, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Sat Apr 6 03:52:31 2013
New Revision: 1465179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1465179
Log:
Update jar versions and JRE req.
Modified:
commons/proper/codec/trunk/default.properties
Looks like Gump is still using
Hi,
I am in the process of releasing the 3.2 version.
The source and binaries archives are online, the maven artifacts have
been published, and now I want to update the site.
I have a stupid question to ask: where is our subversion repository for
the [math] site ?
The page
mvn clean site-deploy must work for single module build.
Do you have any issues using that ?
2013/4/6 Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org:
Hi,
I am in the process of releasing the 3.2 version.
The source and binaries archives are online, the maven artifacts have
been published, and now I
Hi Olivier,
Le 06/04/2013 13:50, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
mvn clean site-deploy must work for single module build.
Do you have any issues using that ?
Yes. Here is what I got from running the command from the RC5 workspace
I still had lying around (I did it from this workspace because
Oh read here http://commons.staging.apache.org/site-publish.html
Use mvn clean site-deploy which is different :-)
I will update the page
http://commons.staging.apache.org/releases/publish-site.html to link
to the other one.
2013/4/6 Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr:
Hi Olivier,
Le
Le 06/04/2013 14:02, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Oh read here http://commons.staging.apache.org/site-publish.html
Use mvn clean site-deploy which is different :-)
Oh crap ...
This means I need to run the 4 hours process once again ?
Isn't it a way I can simply check out the svn repository, copy
2013/4/6 Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr:
Le 06/04/2013 14:02, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Oh read here http://commons.staging.apache.org/site-publish.html
Use mvn clean site-deploy which is different :-)
Oh crap ...
This means I need to run the 4 hours process once again ?
:-)
Isn't it
Hi Luc.
If the new policy is to not release the sources and binaries
(.tar.gz and .zip) through Nexus, could you please update
the
doc/release/release.howto.txt
document which I intended to be a straightforward way[1] to
for anyone (especially maven non-experts) to create a release
for CM?
[To
Hi,
I just noticed a minor mistake in this release, the version number in
the build.xml file is still 3.1-SNAPSHOT.
Is there a way to get the build file generated automatically when
preparing a release?
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/04/2013 22:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
This is a [VOTE] for
I do not have a need for Ant, but I have no idea what downstream users
expect wrt ant. I'm ok with dropping it.
Gary
On Apr 6, 2013, at 5:59, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 April 2013 04:52, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Sat Apr 6 03:52:31 2013
New Revision: 1465179
Le 06/04/2013 15:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
I do not have a need for Ant, but I have no idea what downstream users
expect wrt ant. I'm ok with dropping it.
Please keep the Ant builds if possible. Many Debian packages use them.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique
Hi Gary,
Le 06/04/2013 18:44, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Does anyone know how to address these checkstyle issues:
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/checkstyle.html
Can you tell CS to use one kind of header for Java files and another for
.properties?
How does it know how to
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Gary,
Le 06/04/2013 18:44, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Does anyone know how to address these checkstyle issues:
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/checkstyle.html
Can you tell CS to use one kind of
16 matches
Mail list logo
