As far as I know, this is because cobertura was dropped in favor of Sonar.
I guess codec should
a) define the dependency to cobertura itself
b) use Sonar, like some of the other components (like math) already do.
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/1/26 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
Arg, with
of the components I see do use cobertura. So
I'll have to skip 28 and wait for 29.
Gary
On Jan 27, 2013, at 7:40, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 January 2013 16:22, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
wrote:
As far as I know, this is because cobertura was dropped in favor of
Sonar
Sorry, in your case it should be mvn -Preporting clean site -U
Benedikt
2013/1/28 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
Hey Gary,
I had a short look at the parent and it seems to be okay... I'll try to
build codec after work when I'm at home. Until then, you could try mvn
clean install -U
Am 28.01.2013 um 19:08 schrieb Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com:
On 01/28/2013 07:02 PM, radai wrote:
Hi.
Is there any sort of estimate release date for 1.1.2?
the reason im asking is this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-119 which is affecting
jenkins
Am 28.01.2013 um 21:12 schrieb Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita ki...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Matt
As for the modularization, I went ahead and did this in the trunk. On
the overall I think Bruno's work is proceeding in a good direction,
Am 28.01.2013 um 21:28 schrieb Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com:
On 01/28/2013 09:21 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 um 19:08 schrieb Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com:
On 01/28/2013 07:02 PM, radai wrote:
Hi.
Is there any sort of estimate release date
Thought that would make for a good first commit :) Everything seems to be
working properly.
2013/1/30 brit...@apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Wed Jan 30 21:02:09 2013
New Revision: 1440667
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1440667view=rev
Log:
Added myself to the developers list
Hi Gary,
where does the 1999 come from? The from year seems to be different for
all components. Is it the year the component was created?
Benedikt
2013/1/30 ggreg...@apache.org
Author: ggregory
Date: Wed Jan 30 20:07:11 2013
New Revision: 1440641
URL:
2013/2/2 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 2 February 2013 10:59, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2013/2/2 brit...@apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Sat Feb 2 10:56:03 2013
New Revision: 1441731
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441731view=rev
Log:
Added NOTICE.txt
2013/2/2 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Better make it explicit that getBeanInfo is not a member of
PropertyDescriptorsRegistry
why
Buon giorno Simo,
not sure if my last message was delivered. Accidentally used the wrong
email address.
as I said in the commit message. It is more
.99soft.org/
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/2/2 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Better make it explicit that getBeanInfo is not a member of
PropertyDescriptorsRegistry
why
Buon http://browse.dict.cc/italienisch-deutsch
and what rules of
thumb you use in your projects.
I'm exited to hear your opinions :)
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/4 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Hi,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Simo,
thanks for sharing your thoughts! I personally try to avoid static
imports. Especially when you
.
Matt
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Another common use is with junit to import assertEquals and such.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit
Hi Simo,
2013/2/5 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Guten Tag, Bene,
I personally try to avoid static imports.
Especially when you come to a legacy code base IMHO it makes the code
harder to understand.
as BU2 user, would you write the following sentence
on( testBean
Hi Simo,
2013/2/6 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Guten Morgen,
+/**
+ * Use a custom {@link ClassLoader} for loading the class.
+ *
+ * @param classLoader the {@link ClassLoader} to load the class.
+ * @return the {@link ClassAccessor} for the class being
2013/2/5 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi Simo,
2013/2/5 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Guten Tag, Bene,
I personally try to avoid static imports.
Especially when you come to a legacy code base IMHO it makes the code
harder to understand.
as BU2 user, would you write
Hi Jean-Marc,
2013/2/6 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
OK. You seem to like the feature.
Can I provide the patch for integration then? To whom should I send it?
Please create an issue in JIRA [1] for vfs and attach your svn patch file
to it.
Benedikt
[1]
/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
2013/2/5 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi Simo,
2013/2/5 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Guten Tag, Bene,
I personally try to avoid static imports
2013/2/6 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Definitely a good idea. This is what we did for other parts of the API as
well.
yup I didn't remember where/with who I discussed already that.
Please back everything with an issue and don't forget to include the
issue key in the commit
2013/2/6 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Haven't done that for implementation of setMapped(). Should I create an
issue
That would be the always ideal case, so we have the complete
perspective of things we've worked on.
and at least add it to changes.xml?
Yes please, if you do
Hi,
2013/2/6 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
IMO, any [commons] component can update it's Java requirement as it sees
fit. I would rather see /one/ [math] component instead of two.
My advise would be to (1) plan for a version 3.2 that is based Java 6 or 7
and release 3.1.x versions for
Ciao Simo,
2013/2/7 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
+action dev=britter type=add issue=SANDBOX-438
due-to=Benedikt Ritter
+ Implement setMapped on DefaultBeanAccessor
+/action
you can drop the `due-to` field in that case - I used the `due-to`
field when you
2013/2/7 brit...@apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Thu Feb 7 20:13:23 2013
New Revision: 1443696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1443696
Log:
Fixed checkstyle issues - no functional changes
Modified:
commons/sandbox/beanutils2/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/Argument.java
Hi Simo,
2013/2/8 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
How do you feel about this? Checkstyle complains about this, and I think
it
is sufficient to tell users that an argument must not be null.
sorry, which one?
should have made that clearer :)
I removed the @throws
with the BeanReflectionException base
class.
Does the CheckStyle config
need tweaking?
I think so. I'll try to have a look ASAP.
thanks!
Benedikt
On 8 February 2013 08:26, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Simo,
2013/2/8 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
How do you feel about
I have created SANDBOX-440 [1] for this.
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-440
2013/2/8 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
2013/2/8 Duncan Jones dun...@wortharead.com
In this specific case, I think a ..., not null caveat is sufficient
Hi Sebb,
sorry I only now got the time to have a look at sandbox-parent 10. Works
fine for BeanUtils2. How about dropping cobertura for the next release? It
is already defined in commons-parent reporting profile.
What about the pmd and taglist plugin? There is a comment to move them to
Hi,
while reviewing sandbox-parent release 10 I stumbled across a comment that
the following report plugins should be moved to commons-parent:
- pmd
- cobertura
- taglist
Are there any objections for adding pmd and taglist in the latest stable
version to commons-parent in trunk?
Also I'm
Hi Guys,
I've had a look at the github repo and let me say at first that I'm no
expert in functional programming. So maybe what I'm talking is complete
nonsense :)
From what I learned about the concept of arity at wikipedia it seems that
an arity is a property of a functor.
One could say: A
infinitum seems more convenient than e.g. SomethingThatHasArity, etc.
I agree!
Does that make sense?
As I said, I think pragmatism should win over OO purism :)
Matt
Benedikt
[1] http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1113040
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit
Hi,
more than 48 hours have passed with no objections. Can I just go ahead and
change trunk of commons-parent-pom and commons-sandbox-parent-pom?
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/10 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
while reviewing sandbox-parent release 10 I stumbled across a comment
Hi Sebb
2013/2/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 12 February 2013 20:01, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
more than 48 hours have passed with no objections. Can I just go ahead
and
change trunk of commons-parent-pom and commons-sandbox-parent-pom?
The normal waiting period
Hi Romain,
2013/2/12 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
well not enough time right now but i hope in some weeks
the idea would be to get:
- something to measure (i think it is already here)
- some basic aop (abstraction, spring, cdi?)
Commons components usually don't have any
- Original Message -
From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [functor] Change default arity of Function, Predicate and
Procedure
Hi Matt,
2013/2/12 Matt Benson gudnabr
/*
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/2/13 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi Romain,
2013/2/12 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
well not enough time right now but i hope
2013/2/13 Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
Benedikt,
On 13 févr. 2013, at 08:49, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Commons components usually don't have any dependencies. How would you
implement this under this restriction?
I've never seen this written before. Have you?
Yes, on the commons
Hi Oliver,
nice to see some activity in this component :)
2013/2/13 ol...@apache.org
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Feb 13 21:03:27 2013
New Revision: 1445922
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1445922
Log:
use last parent
Modified:
commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk/pom.xml
Modified:
, but still seemingly doable.
Thoughts?
Matt
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Bruno,
2013/2/12 Bruno P. Kinoshita ki...@apache.org
Hi Benedikt,
Thanks for taking a look at the github repo and for posting your
thoughts
here
Hi Jörg,
I like the simplicity annotations can provide.
As Matt has pointed out Annotations do not define types, which makes it
hard to let the compiler do the validation of the code.
We could implement a custom annotation post processor. But that would
require additional setup for users.
2013/2/14 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 14.02.2013 16:51, schrieb Matt Benson:
I would say that certainly one would often want to create an API like
you've described. What I am reluctant not to support is:
class Foo {
static void add(ArgumentedBinary? extends
2013/2/12 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi Sebb
2013/2/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 12 February 2013 20:01, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
more than 48 hours have passed with no objections. Can I just go ahead
and
change trunk of commons-parent-pom and commons
Hi again,
2013/2/15 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
2013/2/12 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi Sebb
2013/2/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 12 February 2013 20:01, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
more than 48 hours have passed with no objections. Can I just go
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/17 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Sun Feb 17 10:00:32 2013
New Revision: 1447004
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1447004
Log:
[CLI-231] removed DoubleCheckedLocking test in checkstyle config.
According to the committer's FAQ [1] the name of the contributor should be
2013/2/17 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/17/2013 12:56 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/17 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Sun Feb 17 10:00:32 2013
New Revision: 1447004
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1447004
Log:
[CLI-231] removed
Hi,
I'd like to discuss how the development of [BeanUtils] and [BeanUtils2] can
be continued.
The last release of BeanUtils (1.8.3) is now nearly 3 years ago and there
are 92 open issues in JIRA.
OTOH we've put quiet some effort into [BeanUtils2]. There are some issues
that have to be addressed*
Ciao Simo,
thanks a lot! I adopted the p-tags from BU1. I was wondering why they are
used in that way in BU1. Should have asked the ML. I'll change this tonight!
Benedikt
2013/2/17 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
unneeded, I suggest you to read our mate Stephen's blog about that:
Hi Simo,
IIUC exclusions can only be defined for a hole checker. But
allowUndeclaredRTE is a property of the JavadocMethod checker. I don't see
how I can change the value of the property with an exclusion filter. So I
had to copy the hole config just to change that one property (I documented
this
2013/2/17 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I'd like to discuss how the development of [BeanUtils] and [BeanUtils2]
can be continued.
The last release of BeanUtils (1.8.3) is now nearly 3 years ago and there
are 92 open issues in JIRA.
OTOH we've put quiet some effort
Hi Jörg
2013/2/20 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Hi Benedikt,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss how the development of [BeanUtils] and [BeanUtils2]
can be continued.
The last release of BeanUtils (1.8.3) is now nearly 3 years ago and there
are 92 open
Hi,
2013/2/20 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 20.02.2013 16:25, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Jörg
2013/2/20 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Hi Benedikt,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss how the development of [BeanUtils] and [BeanUtils2]
can
Hi,
I've tried to build [beantutils] from trunk but I can't get
o.a.c.b.memoryleaktest.MemoryLeakTest to pass. I have played around with my
-Xmx setting, like it says in pom.xml.
Using -Xmx25m will lead to an OutOfMemoryError.
Setting memory up in 5m steps I will see an OutOfMemoryError till
Hi again,
2013/2/22 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Hallo Jörg und Bene! :)
Not sure for this special case either. Actually you're not promoting a
new
component. However, you may look into the archives, IIRC Simo had the
same
case for the last major release of digester.
What
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:40:34 2013
New Revision: 1448981
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1448981
Log:
[EMAIL-125] Add datasource name for ByteArrayDataSource, fixes embedding
multiple resources loaded from a ClassPath resolver.
Modified:
Hi Thomas
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 01:50 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/22/2013 01:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Fri Feb 22 10:40:34 2013
New Revision: 1448981
URL: http
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05:35 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/22/2013 05:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:48 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:33 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05:50 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05:35 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/22/2013 05:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:48 PM
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 08:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05:50 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
Hallo Thomas,
o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/23 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd
.
Benedikt
2013/2/22 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi Benedikt,
Am 21.02.2013 20:14, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi,
2013/2/20 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 20.02.2013 16:25, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Jörg
2013/2/20 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai
Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 08:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 02/22/2013 05:50 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
2013/2/22 Thomas Neidhart
Hi Simo,
2013/2/23 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
why? where did you read email address shall be not in explicit form?
I stumbled across Niall Pemberton's email address that was in
at-apache-dot-org format. I thought that it would be better to have all
addresses in the same format.
Hi,
I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection
property describe will only return the first entry of this member.
This is, because for describe() properties are converted to strings by
Hi Simo,
2013/2/24 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Hi there Bene,
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ public class ConstructorUtils {
InstantiationException {
Object[] args = { arg };
+if (arg == null) {
+args = null;
+}
return
://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Simo,
2013/2/23 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
why? where did you read email address shall be not in explicit form?
I stumbled across Niall
2013/2/25 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Simo,
2013/2/24 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
Hi there Bene,
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ public class ConstructorUtils {
InstantiationException {
Object[] args = { arg
2013/2/25 brit...@apache.org
Author: britter
Date: Mon Feb 25 20:37:28 2013
New Revision: 1449876
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449876
Log:
Invert conditional logic as discussed on the ML (
http://markmail.org/message/psfzd3l7yaxx6n5v)
Modified:
?
We did not have the need for that kind of handling in BU2 because we used
varargs.
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit
Hi,
there is an issue to create a git mirror of BeanUtils [1]. This seems to be
as easy as creating an issue for INFRA [2]. I just wanted to ask if there
has to be some sort of formal decision (from the PMC) before a git mirror
can be requested.
If not I'd like to take care of this.
Thanks,
Hello Jean-Marc
2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed
to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue
or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch.
Nice that you've joined us!
Where
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
I have looked through a lot of issues in the meantime
HI Naill
2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
issue for INFRA.
Benedikt
2013/2/27 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
there is an issue to create a git mirror of BeanUtils [1]. This seems
Hi Oliver,
2013/2/28 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right
Hello Gergely,
2013/3/1 KONTRA, Gergely pihent...@gmail.com
Hi all!
As I find my concrete issue in the JIRA here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-195#comment-13589406 I
have a new question:
I am ready to fix this problem, and I would like to contribute the result
to the
2013/3/1 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
2013/3/1 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
This might have to be done of a component by component basis, not sure?
Let's try with one, which one?
I think he
in getting involved, there is a guide on this
topic [1].
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com javascript:; wrote:
Hi,
Benedikt Ritter wrote
2013/3/1 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 01.03.2013 09:20, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
2013/2/28 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted
2013/3/2 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:12:46 2013
New Revision: 1451914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1451914
Log:
[COLLECTIONS-366] Added ListUtils.range methods.
Modified:
commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/collections/ListUtils.java
, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
issue for INFRA.
As far as I know, there are no specific decisions about Git mirrors.
There are already a few of them
2013/3/2 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 03/02/2013 07:33 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2013/3/2 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:12:46 2013
New Revision: 1451914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1451914
Log:
[COLLECTIONS-366] Added ListUtils.range methods
Hi,
@author tags are no longer used, because authors are documented in pom.xml.
I don't know the history of BeanUtils so I'm asking if there are any
arguments against moving authors from source code files to pom.xml.
I will wait for 72 hours before I create a JIRA issue for this change.
Regards,
Hi sebb,
2013/3/3 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
Log:
Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords
-1
Please don't use $Date$ - it is rendered
2013/3/3 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 3 March 2013 19:27, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi sebb,
2013/3/3 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
URL: http
2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I tried to send the announcement in the morning with my apache.orgemail
address, but nothing came through so far.
2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart
2013/3/3 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
2013/3/2 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On 03/02/2013 07:33 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2013/3/2 t...@apache.org
Author: tn
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:12:46 2013
New Revision: 1451914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1451914
Log
Am 05.03.2013 um 21:56 schrieb Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Thanks both Gary and Sebb,
It seems very unlikely that anyone will still be running Java 1.3 or
Java 1.4, so the change to 1.5 is not likely to concern users, even
though it is a bit of a jump.
Is the addition of
I'm a bit short on time right now. I'll try to have another look on this, this
weekend.
Benedikt
Send from my mobile device
Am 04.03.2013 um 10:42 schrieb Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
$Revision$ is usally enough; if you really want a date, use $id$
+1
Are you okay with this
Hi
FYI it seems @author is discouraged:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-jmeter-dev/200402.mbox/%3c4039f65e.7020...@atg.com%3E
Le 5 mars 2013 22:46, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I'd like to close LOGGING-149 [1] for 1.1.2. It's just about the
documentation regarding OSGi support on our website [2]. Comments are
appreciated.
Benedikt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-149
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Logging/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
--
Hi Simo,
have you looked at the changes report?
Benedikt
2013/3/6 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
same for FileItemHeaders, looks to me that they were contributed in
the same patch
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Simo,
have you looked at the changes report?
Benedikt
2013/3/6 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
same for FileItemHeaders, looks to me that they were contributed
Hi,
I have recently learned that changing the required Java version for a
component does not necessarily affect binary compartibility [1].
I'm thinking about updating [BeanUtils] to Java 1.5. We would have the
following advantages:
- concurrency facilities in java.util.concurrent (could be
2013/3/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation?
Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old
methods.
e.g.
@Deprecated
public int
you'll moving my @author to pom.xml ;)
Gary
Gary
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Thanks for your comments. I have create BEANUTILS-431 [1]. Since Craig
McClanahan doesn't seem to follow the ML I will contact him directly to
be
sure he is okay
2013/3/6 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com
Hi,
Am 06.03.2013 um 12:51 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/3/6 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation?
Create new methods
for removing them)
Cheers
Gary
Gary
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
Thanks for your comments. I have create BEANUTILS-431 [1]. Since Craig
McClanahan doesn't seem to follow the ML I will contact him directly
to
be
sure he
I have create BEANUTILS-432 [1] for this.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-432
2013/3/6 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 06.03.2013 13:35, schrieb sebb:
On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I have recently learned
I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
$Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Benedikt
2013/3/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
I'm a bit short on time right now. I'll
101 - 200 of 2401 matches
Mail list logo
