On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:03:44 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of
> On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I
>>> would like
Le 17/09/2016 à 16:07, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> +1 ... normally. However, IIRC correctly, Gilles once said that all the RNG
> stuff was never part of a release. In that case this code can be simply
> dropped.
Actually some of the RNG stuff has been in Commons Math for years, the
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I
> would like to attempt working with some short term goals. The hope here is
> to think about questions along the lines of: "what can be done today/this
> week/this month,” with the
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I would
like to attempt working with some short term goals. The hope here is to think
about questions along the lines of: "what can be done today/this week/this
month,” with the goal aiming at chipping away at what