Re: [Cancelled] [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

On 21 May 2012 20:45, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote: Hi folks, the vote is cancelled +1 votes : none +0 votes : none -1 votes : none The following issues were identified by Oliver Heger * commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain the license and

[Cancelled] [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

Hi folks, the vote is cancelled +1 votes : none +0 votes : none -1 votes : none The following issues were identified by Oliver Heger * commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF folder. * The binary distribution lacks

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

Hi Oliver, thanks for checking the RC 1) missing LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt - This is actually handled by commons-parent-24.pom in the resource section and should work out-of-the-box. Having said that it does not work for

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

Hi, build worked for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. However, I found the following problems: - commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF folder. - The clirr report contains 29 errors. I did not follow discussions

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

On 6 May 2012 17:55, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Hi, build worked for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. However, I found the following problems: - commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF

[VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC3

Hi, I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC3 Changes in this version include: New features: o Update the current trunk to be binary compatible with the commons-email-1.2 release. Issue: EMAIL-111. Thanks to Florian Pirchner. o Added unit test to ensure that parsing