Hi Joan,
Having done some work with the Windows build in the past, I'm happy to try to
help with automating it. If you think there's anything I can do, maybe we could
have a separate discussion on the steps needed to make it better.
Nick
> On 16 Dec 2016, at 19:20, Joan Touzet
On 12/16/2016 02:10 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail) wrote:
> Very cool. We've been wanting a packaged version of 2.0 for a while.
>
You can try the snap I built, it's on
http://people.ubuntu.com/~mhall119/snaps/
Download it and run "snap install --dangerous couchdb_2.0_amd64.snap"
(assuming you're on
The Windows build process is not 100% automatable right now, nor
has it ever been. There's a bunch more work necessary to make that
happen. Ideally, someone would offer to help me with this.
The actual *publish* of an approved final build should still be a
manually invoked process, especially
Very cool. We've been wanting a packaged version of 2.0 for a while.
This might be jumping the gun, but I'm curious to know what the story
is for upgrading from previous, non-snap versions is, and how
post-snap upgrades will be handled. At first glance, it seems like
there is a trade off between
Hi,
I wanted to test the waters regarding a CouchDB 2.1 release. Since 2.0
a few new features and many bug fixes have landed.
I know its holiday season soon and I wanted to kick off the discussion
about a release date for 2.0.1 or 2.1.0.
One thing that worries me (correct me if I am wrong): I
Everything set up, I think we have to figure out when the next release happens.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> Hi Micheal,
>
> thank you so much! You are doing awesome work!
>
> I registered an account: https://cldup.com/1cbKxu0igy.png
>
> Let's chat
Hi Micheal,
thank you so much! You are doing awesome work!
I registered an account: https://cldup.com/1cbKxu0igy.png
Let's chat on IRC regarding the next steps, I don't know how to use
snap on my Mac.
Best,
Robert
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
>