On 29 September 2012 13:43, Hans J Schroeder h...@cloudno.de wrote:
Hi,
It would be great to have a universal, standardized build environment for
CouchDB and its variants. Additionally we should offer prebuilt packages
because the average user likes to start using CouchDB without having to
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Voilà, hopefully this thread can be a good start for merging rcouch,
bigcouch apache couchdb and will ease merge of the other features imo.
As a distributor, the most important deficiency in today's release
tarballs
On 1 October 2012 14:57, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Voilà, hopefully this thread can be a good start for merging rcouch,
bigcouch apache couchdb and will ease merge of the other features imo.
As a
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
Seems like the right thing for couchdb to do, but I'm not sure I
understand this fully. Do you mean that you'd like to (say)
./configure --use-this-snappy-library --use-that-other-library
approach, and as a distributor
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Voilà, hopefully this thread can be a good start for merging rcouch,
bigcouch apache couchdb and will ease merge of the other features imo.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Voilà, hopefully this thread can be a good start for merging
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure what you mean. spidermonkey is choosed on the system while
snappy is build statically if it's what you mean. My proposal for
package maintainer is to use the autotools for that. Which would solve
all of their
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
Seems like the right thing for couchdb to do, but I'm not sure I
understand this fully. Do you mean that you'd like to (say)
./configure
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
Done: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Build_Process
+1, and many thanks for the excellent summary Benoit.
Thanks!
Selfishly, I'd much prefer the proposed approach than the current one.
The reality is that autotools
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure what you mean. spidermonkey is choosed on the system while
snappy is build statically if it's what you mean. My proposal for
package
Hi,
It would be great to have a universal, standardized build environment for
CouchDB and its variants. Additionally we should offer prebuilt packages
because the average user likes to start using CouchDB without having to hassle
with the build.
As CouchDB is so great for syncing with mobile
11 matches
Mail list logo