[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-576) Require current update_seq when deleting a database for extra safety.

2009-11-24 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-576: -- Attachment: delete-db-safety-with-tests.patch changed seq= to update_seq= and added tests.

[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-576) Require current update_seq when deleting a database for extra safety.

2009-11-24 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-576: -- Attachment: (was: safer_database_deletes.patch) Require current update_seq when deleting

Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, Why do we have a cryptography notice in README? It seems that NOTICE would be a much more logical choice for this information. Does anyone have any objections to me moving it? Thanks, Noah

[jira] Created: (COUCHDB-578) Every statistic description is truncated

2009-11-24 Thread Robert Newson (JIRA)
Every statistic description is truncated Key: COUCHDB-578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-578 Project: CouchDB Issue Type: Bug Components: Database Core

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Damien Katz
I think I did that, and I think I did it that way because some other Apache project did it that way. -Damien On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Hey, Why do we have a cryptography notice in README? It seems that NOTICE would be a much more logical choice for this

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-24 Thread Filipe Manana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782114#action_12782114 ] Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-558: --- Any news on this? cheers Validate

Improving pagination for views

2009-11-24 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
This weekend I tried to implement pagination for one of the modules of a Couch-based site I maintain. Here's a rambling account of things that I don't like and ideas about how maybe it could be improved. In short: it kind of sucks. I usually prefer to get a list of pages so people can jump around

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, Why do we have a cryptography notice in README? It seems that NOTICE would be a much more logical choice for this information. Does anyone have any objections to me moving it? Thanks, Noah

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-558) Validate Content-MD5 request headers on uploads

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782119#action_12782119 ] Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-558: --- Filipe, I've put it on the todo

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
On 24 Nov 2009, at 19:37, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, Why do we have a cryptography notice in README? It seems that NOTICE would be a much more logical choice for this information. Does anyone have any objections to

Re: Improving pagination for views

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote: This weekend I tried to implement pagination for one of the modules of a Couch-based site I maintain. Here's a rambling account of things that I don't like and ideas about how maybe it could be improved. In short: it

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 19:37, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, Why do we have a cryptography notice in README? It seems that NOTICE would be a much more

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
On 24 Nov 2009, at 20:11, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Balls. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bb8P7dfjVw Good advert, but Jose Gonzales is so 2007 it hurts.

[jira] Resolved: (COUCHDB-578) Every statistic description is truncated

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Joseph Davis resolved COUCHDB-578. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.11 Assignee: Paul Joseph Davis

Re: Cryptography notice in README

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 20:11, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Balls. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bb8P7dfjVw Good advert, but Jose Gonzales is so 2007 it

[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-577) couchdb @ winxp: Simple RegExp's can not be executed

2009-11-24 Thread Mark Hammond (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782192#action_12782192 ] Mark Hammond commented on COUCHDB-577: -- I can only guess this is due to a difference

libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, I'm just trying to prepare the release on a fresh Ubuntu 9.10 virtual machine, and I've run into something rather strange. The libmozjs-dev library conflicts, through some weird dependancy chain, with firefox. Has anyone run into this before? Any Ubuntu hackers know what's going on here?

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, I'm just trying to prepare the release on a fresh Ubuntu 9.10 virtual machine, and I've run into something rather strange. The libmozjs-dev library conflicts, through some weird dependancy chain, with firefox.

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:39, Benoit Chesneau wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, I'm just trying to prepare the release on a fresh Ubuntu 9.10 virtual machine, and I've run into something rather strange. The libmozjs-dev library conflicts,

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Elliot Murphy
On 11/24/2009 05:42 PM, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:39, Benoit Chesneau wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Noah Slaternsla...@tumbolia.org wrote: Hey, I'm just trying to prepare the release on a fresh Ubuntu 9.10 virtual machine, and I've run into something rather

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Elliot Murphy wrote: libmozjs is not available in the Ubuntu 9.10 environment, so the CouchDB package is patched to build and run against xulrunner, where libmozjs.so is available. I don't know all the details of this, but it's some sort of complication with the

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
On 24 Nov 2009, at 23:32, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Elliot Murphy wrote: libmozjs is not available in the Ubuntu 9.10 environment, so the CouchDB package is patched to build and run against xulrunner, where libmozjs.so is available. I don't know all the details of

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 25 Nov 2009, at 00:40, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 23:32, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Elliot Murphy wrote: libmozjs is not available in the Ubuntu 9.10 environment, so the CouchDB package is patched to build and run against xulrunner, where libmozjs.so

Re: Improving pagination for views

2009-11-24 Thread Vlad GURDIGA
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote: This weekend I tried to implement pagination for one of the modules of a Couch-based site I maintain. Here's a rambling account of things

Re: Increasing Spidermonkey version

2009-11-24 Thread Jan Lehnardt
For more evidence how this affects us see the libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu from today. Cheers Jan -- On 19 Nov 2009, at 18:35, Mikeal Rogers wrote: The issue seems to be that some stuff was broken in Spidermonkey that didn't effect Firefox or Thunderbird and the fixes for

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 25 Nov 2009, at 00:40, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 23:32, Noah Slater wrote: On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Elliot Murphy wrote: libmozjs is not available in the Ubuntu 9.10 environment, so the CouchDB package

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Randall Leeds
Seems like the best thing would be for the xulrunner(-dev) packages in ubuntu to make sure pkg-config can find the sdk and then use pkg-config to find the libraries. -Randall On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 16:11, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Jan Lehnardt

Re: Improving pagination for views

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
Paging backwards works by using the current first key in the result set and using reverse=true. Just a quick question regarding this reverse thing: will you get the records in reverse order? Yup.

Re: Increasing Spidermonkey version

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: For more evidence how this affects us see the libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu from today. Cheers Jan -- I'm not sure the XULRunner vs. Firefox vs. libmozjs is really related to release versions. I'd consider

Re: libmozjs-dev conflicts with firefox on Ubuntu

2009-11-24 Thread Matt Goodall
2009/11/25 Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com: Seems like the best thing would be for the xulrunner(-dev) packages in ubuntu to make sure pkg-config can find the sdk and then use pkg-config to find the libraries. Yes, the path has already changed once since Karmic was released. - Matt

[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.2 release

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.9.2 release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting

[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.10.1 release

2009-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.10.1 release. We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting