Github user garrensmith closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/39
(Copying in the dev@ list.)
This sounds like a great initiative. Let us know how it goes!
On 6 May 2013 15:51, Mehdi Ahmadi me...@appical.nl wrote:
Dear all,
We are striving for the realisation of:
* Support for NoSQL Datastore Systems.
* migration / transition away from SQL
Piwik - is
Dear community,
This is advance notice that we plan to do a bugfix release this month.
The following release lines are targeted:
* 1.3.x
We intend to start the voting in three weeks from today. Please use this
time to review any outstanding changes to be made, merging them in as
necessary,
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 5b45348d8 - a95f1b134
Add notice_release.txt
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-admin/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-admin/commit/a95f1b13
Tree:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment to review our existing release branches today, and I have
prepared a list of recommendations for you. Please review these and give me
feedback.
By drop support I mean make official and while this is ostensibly the
case for a few
+1
On 7 May 2013 19:34, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment to review our existing release branches today, and I have
prepared a list of recommendations for you. Please review these and give me
feedback.
By drop support
+1
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On 7 May 2013 19:34, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment to review our existing release branches today, and I have
prepared a list of
On 7 May 2013 20:34, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment to review our existing release branches today, and I have
prepared a list of recommendations for you. Please review these and give me
feedback.
By drop support I
I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
releases.
However, we can discuss what the minimum lazy consensus period can be
based on what the minimum time that community members feel they can
respond.
I'd prefer to keep a 72 hour window for lazy consensus.
Adam
On May 7, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
releases.
However,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
releases.
However, we can discuss what the minimum lazy consensus period can be
Hi All,
I propose to merge in the following work,
https://github.com/rnewson/couchdb/tree/nebraska-merge-candidate to
the official Apache CouchDB repository to a new branch (i.e, *not*
master). Once there, the full CouchDB developer community can begin
the work to incorporate the code here into
FYI: A zip of this work is available at
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/nebraska-merge-candidate.zip
made by 'git archive -o nebraska-merge-candidate.zip
nebraska-merge-candidate'
On 7 May 2013 21:34, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
I propose to merge in the following
+1
Very excited to see this! Great work!
-Russell
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
FYI: A zip of this work is available at
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/nebraska-merge-candidate.zip
made by 'git archive -o nebraska-merge-candidate.zip
+1
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Russell Branca chewbra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Very excited to see this! Great work!
-Russell
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
FYI: A zip of this work is available at
Ah, well. Who cares, right? Just a bit more entropy for the Universe to
suck up.
On 7 May 2013 20:01, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
On 7 May 2013 20:34, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment to review
(Note: the work was valuable any how, because master now has an accurate
record of history.)
On 7 May 2013 20:01, Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com wrote:
On 7 May 2013 20:34, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
We're switching over to time-based releases.
I took a moment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13651319#comment-13651319
]
Christopher Bonhage commented on COUCHDB-1368:
--
I just got burned by this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13651331#comment-13651331
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1368:
Hi Christopher,
The work here is to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13651339#comment-13651339
]
Christopher Bonhage commented on COUCHDB-1368:
--
Hi Robert, I most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13651356#comment-13651356
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1368:
thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13651380#comment-13651380
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1368:
There must be more to it. I just made a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Bonhage updated COUCHDB-1368:
-
Attachment: replication.log
Attached is the debug log from my 1.3.0 CouchDB
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
releases.
This si another topic. Also votes on release need a majority of
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
Arpit created COUCHDB-1789:
--
Summary: CouchDB 1.3 Futon (using Chrome,IE, FF ) freezes while
displaying large documents
Key: COUCHDB-1789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1789
Project:
26 matches
Mail list logo
