On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The functional features in JavaScript 1.8 could greatly aid developers
when writing map-reduce functions for views.
Does anyone oppose upping the language version? If so, I'd appreciate
hearing their
, it was in a rather early stage
at that time, but still).
Brad
From: Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: JavaScript 1.8 Features in SpiderMonkey (Please?)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:23 PM
, but still).
Brad
From: Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: JavaScript 1.8 Features in SpiderMonkey (Please?)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: JavaScript 1.8 Features in SpiderMonkey (Please?)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Zachary Zolton
zachary.zol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The functional features in JavaScript 1.8 could greatly aid developers
when writing map-reduce functions for views.
Does anyone oppose upping
On 23/03/2009 19:34, Paul Davis wrote:
I don't think it'd be a good idea to require until it hits general
consumption (as in, shows up in package managers). Their build
procedure is at best, 'interesting'. Also, there's nothing to keep you
from linking couchjs against a newer version of the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On 23/03/2009 19:34, Paul Davis wrote:
I don't think it'd be a good idea to require until it hits general
consumption (as in, shows up in package managers). Their build
procedure is at best, 'interesting'. Also,
