tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
In reality, some users, like my clients, still use 2.4.x for some reasons.
On 2011/04/27 1:15, Marcus Lange wrote:
Really? I'm surprised.
To avoid misleading, let me explain why slightly older versions are demanded.
It is not for Windows 98.
In short, it is
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Hi Tora,
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
In reality, some users, like my clients, still use 2.4.x for some
reasons.
On 2011/04/27 1:15, Marcus Lange wrote:
Really? I'm surprised.
I know these arguments already from my work. It's typically and normal
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Hi Tora,
What do you think of this mockup?
great. :-) Would be indeed a big step forward to avoid offering download
links that don't have an existing file behind it - as Andrea already said.
A user chooses Product, Version, OS, Architecture, Type, JRE,
Hi Andrea, Clinton, Marcus,
Thanks for positive opinions about the mockup!
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
What do you think of this mockup?
On 2011/04/26 23:01, Marcus Lange wrote:
great. :-) Would be indeed a big step forward to avoid offering download links
that don't have an existing
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
On 2011/04/26 23:01, Marcus Lange wrote:
Hi Tora,
The Version choice is not necessary as normally there is only a single
version existing per OS+Arch and language combination. Atr least this
should be the goal. Older builds
Marcus Lange wrote:
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
On 2011/04/26 23:01, Marcus Lange wrote:
Hi Tora,
The Version choice is not necessary as normally there is only a
single version existing per OS+Arch and language combination. Atr
least this should be the
Andy Brown wrote:
Marcus Lange wrote:
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
On 2011/04/26 23:01, Marcus Lange wrote:
Hi Andy,
The Version choice is not necessary as normally there is only a
single version existing per OS+Arch and language combination. Atr
least
tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
A little bit objection.
In reality, some users, like my clients, still use 2.4.x for some reasons.
Indeed this happens, but still I would redirect people to the archive,
to make it clear that we don't endorse the download of OOo versions
known to contain security
Personally I like it.
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:52:43 +0900
From: t...@openoffice.org
To: dev@distribution.openoffice.org
Subject: [distribution-dev] Mockup for Download OpenOffice.org
Hi,
What do you think of this mockup?
A user chooses Product, Version, OS, Architecture, Type,
