I'm not subscribing to d...@felix.a.o at the moment, but would still like to
hear the outcome of this...
Richard, we (you and I at least) have discussed this more than once in the
past and I totally agree with Guillaume that the perception is there, it is
everything and near impossible to change.
, but only with
the Incompatible Port to OSGi.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
] /tmp/felix-staging
Isn't that like a Trust Me! I won't hurt your computer. popup dialog ;-) ??
A for effort, not so much for security Anyway...
+1, non-binding.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
attention this have received, and positive
comments all around (i'll add mine now), why move it to Felix.
I suggest that it goes straight into a TLP. It makes so much more sense.
+1 to the idea of breaking out the SMX Kernel.
+1 to the Karaf name.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
Well, I certainly don't mind releasing our sources, I won't claim our
JavaDoc are very interesting. :-) I guess we just need to do it.
Just to set the mindset accurately, in case it is missed somewhere...
From the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12666855#action_12666855
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on FELIX-899:
--
I disagree that BND should guess the Import
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Clement Escoffier
clement.escoff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The KEYS file is here : http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS
Do we need to add it at the root of the repository? The release management
guide just say to append it to
+1
Cheers
Niclas
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled the release candidate for the Configuration Admin release
1.0.6 and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~fmeschbe/org.apache.felix.configadmin-1.0.6/
The KEYS file for
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
I've compiled the release candidate for the Configuration Admin release
1.0.8 and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~fmeschbe/org.apache.felix.configadmin-1.0.8/
+1
Cheers
Niclas
--
http://www.qi4j.org -
Tim,
also beware that Sun's JVM caches a lot of the stuff in the resource
management system, and IIRC URLStreamHandlerFactories belong in that
category too, at least if used via the java.net.handler.pkgs system
property. Perhaps the setURLStreamHandlerFactory is better behaved,
but I suggest to
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases,
bundlerepository 1.2.1
framework 1.4.0
main 1.4.0
[x] +1 Approve the releases
[ ] -1 Veto the releases (please provide specific comments)
Cheers
Niclas
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a little bit of advertising now that I am employed by Sun,
but I wanted to point out that GlassFish v3 Prelude with Felix was released
today:
Well done!! So your work is finished and you move on to greater
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Marcel Offermans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the compendium services that Apache Felix still lacks is an
implementation of the Device Access Specification. Within luminis, Dennis
Geurts has developed a device manager which implements the spec and he
agreed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12638948#action_12638948
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on FELIX-763:
--
AFAIR, not Jetty 4 nor Jetty 5 did it any
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D'oh! Who is going to answer the Bundle Plugin questions!?
Just accept that the OSGi World stop for 2 weeks ;o)
Cheers
Niclas
On Friday 01 August 2008 22:10, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Starting in this middle of this month, I will be working for Sun
Microsystems as part of the GlassFish team.
Cool. And you will be working mostly on getting GlassFish onto KnopflerFish,
right? A fish is a fish! ;o)
Cheers
--
Niclas
assume I will need to rename the packages accordingly.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Monday 28 July 2008 08:00, Richard S. Hall wrote:
such as Flogger, for Felix logger,
+1 for Flogger.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
for Foundation EE would be good for people in the embedded
space.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Stuart McCulloch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, setting this would break Pax-Logging, because then the application
would load the Log4J public API classes from the standard Log4J jar - rather
than the custom classes from Pax-Logging that fix Log4J logging for
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Stuart McCulloch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
again, this wouldn't solve the Pax-Logging issue because
then the application will have all it's logging calls bound to
the original Log4J jar, which lacks the OSGi support that
Pax-Logging provides (various other
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it somehow possible that log4j is
doing some classloader magic itself and maybe is using the context
classloader? The context classloader would be the WebAppClassloader I
think ...
Good Suggestion. Will investigate that
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, please check the release and cast your votes - the vote will be open
for 72 hours.
+1
Cheers
Niclas
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just have to figure out how to do that in Struts. What would it mean to
configure Struts in an OSGi container?
Well, it seems that you guys have not defined what you mean by OSGify
Struts. There are several levels
On Monday 02 June 2008 13:50, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
As per IP Clearance recommendations, please cast your votes to accept the
Pax Logging implementation of the OSGi Log Service specification, utilizing
Log4J as the backend.
Pax Logging is already available under the Apache License
the package name from the class name.
2) Locate all bundles exporting that package.
3) Check which Bundle Classloader equals the class' classloader.
No?
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http
in the used section, since
it has dependencies on maven and commons code?
Yes, and not a showstopper.
+1 to release. (binding)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
), and will lower the initial need for in-container tests.
Setting it up is easy, if you know what you are doing, so I suggest that
someone here volunteers (Stuart???) to help you out.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com
be able to retrieve that info very easily from the Package
Admin service.
For private packages, the answer from Richard seems to reflect(!) reality, and
will be framework dependent.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman updated FELIX-589:
-
Attachment: pax-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.SHA1
pax-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.MD5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman reassigned FELIX-589:
Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
IP Clearance of Pax Logging
On Monday 02 June 2008 13:50, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
My vote;
[x] +1, I am in favor.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12601536#action_12601536
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on FELIX-589:
--
A complete list of contributors to the project
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
of codebases re-locating from Felix to the
Pax project on the basis of the above, other than individuals outside the
Felix project grabbing the sources and continue to evolve at OPS4J. If/when
that happens we can discuss this matter further.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live
On Monday 02 June 2008 16:53, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the near future, Pax Web will also be donated, as it is an
implementation of the OSGi Log Service spec.
Assuming you mean Http Service :-)
Doh!!
Anyways
on other Apache licensed projects, both
in source and binary form. So, I think 3. is totally feasible and probably
recommended.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
in question has been uploaded to
people.apache.org:/home/niclas/donations.
[ ] +1, I am in favor.
[ ] 0, I don't care.
[ ] -1, I oppose the donation.
Only PMC Member votes are binding, but general public is encouraged to express
their thoughts.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live
On Saturday 31 May 2008 04:19, Pedro Pedruzzi wrote:
Patch attached with some minor fixes in the Configuration render.
Patches are needed to be posted to JIRA, as that provides a record of you aer
providing it on Apache License terms.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here
work on such candidates to bring this up themselves.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman closed FELIX-527.
Improve Error Reporting during binding
--
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman resolved FELIX-527.
--
Resolution: Invalid
This is not a Felix bug. It happens in pre-1.0 Pax Logging when Exceptions
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
, Christian. Welcome
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:11, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
+1
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com
.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
+1, if vote is still open.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
+1, if vote is still open.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
+1, if the vote is still open.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 06:26, Anna Chen wrote:
We are maintaining 3 synched-up OBR repositories and
load-balancing for them.
For this case, I assume you have 3 identical systems. Learn how to use rsync.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com
different
systems. Suggestions are welcome.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
[x] +1 merge the bundle and OBR plugins and add OBR deploy to the 'bundle'
lifecycle (a+b)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
to be
lock-free when calling out to code outside its control??
(that was something I concluded with my own similar framework back in 1999)
[1] http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXLOGGING-20
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here
-framework interoperability focus. I think it will benefit
us all.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
+1
Cheer
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
not sure how ASF
policies are about this. We are expected to put it into /dist for archiving
purposes and not rely on external resources for that.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http
, and is at the same time Http Service spec compliant.
Feel free to draw your own conclusions.
/hat
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 06:23, Felix Meschberger wrote:
On behalf of the PMC, congratulations Stuart and keep up the great work.
Warm welcome of Stuart to the PMC.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com
.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Saturday 05 January 2008 19:15, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
+1
+1
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
to the ASF.
Instead, the release will typically be (if approved), one src and one bin
tarball/zip placed on people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/
together with checksums and signatures. This location is part of the mirror
and backup systems.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I
to the general public. The source release is
required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
a motivation. I suspect that BND is just collecting
all, and just doesn't have a last pass where only the private packages are
discarded from the uses lists. Should be fairly simple to add... :o)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here
that it there are still many problems for the OSGi environment, which
will be hard to track/find for the average user. A quick look at LogFactory,
and I am pretty convinced that I my suspicion is accurate.
Personally, I think the Logging scene is absurd...
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here
to deal with OSGi. By providing a apparent OSGi bundle, which in
reality will only create more problems than it solves is IMNSHO
counter-productive.
Thanks
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http
On Friday 28 December 2007 23:38, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
In order to prepare our upcoming releases of the various projects,
I assembled the 1.0.1 version of our parent pom and put it up here
for voting:
+1
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
-clearance/index.html
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
! Phew!).
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Friday 28 September 2007 20:28, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Deployment Admin spec
What exactly are you referring to here??
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Thursday 27 September 2007 22:11, Peter Kriens wrote:
Wow, I'll add this table to bnd so it can warn about mismatches
between the execution env. and the used java packages.
Cool. If we could have available easy-to-use jars with the correct content,
then that would be awesome combo. After
have that here in Felix at
all.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 06:27, Karl Pauls wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.1 framework and main releases.
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I
for the 'release often' cycles, and keep up the good work.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
not generate any exception.
I suggest you file a bug report.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Friday 07 September 2007 15:21, Felix Meschberger wrote:
[...] built-in handlers should
take priority over handlers from the service registry to guarantee
consistency. The built-in handlers, as defined in the OSGi execution
environments must never be overridden.
I don't have the SCSL'ed
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 21:08, Felix Meschberger wrote:
(2) For services registered through SCR, the service.pid property is set
if configuration exists in the Configuration Admin for the service. In
addition these services have the component.name property set.
I find this statement
does tab completion have any clue that buntab means bundle and can
only be followed by bundle IDs of installed bundles??
And how hard could it be to do such support directly in Shell TUI??
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 02:59, Karl Pauls wrote:
Not according to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html. There it
says:
Not easy to be in ASF, since I am pretty sure it wasn't like that a couple of
years back, where PMC was only about oversight and legalities, incl releases.
And
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 16:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Putting it very simple, committers
can commit and the PMC can make the decisions like voting (on project
related stuff like new committers etc.), veto a commit etc.
There are several camps across the ASF. Anything that Stefano has had a
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 18:54, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
+1 for moving it to the sandbox - for some reason clement's site is not
accessible from malaysia...
It is from my house... we can check in the office tomorrow.
Cheers
Niclas
.
Btw, I like the Fishing analogy!
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 07:27, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Are you interested in improving the felix TUI interface by using library
such JLine which provide: TAB Completition, History and other nice
feature to the input reader?
I would be grateful!
Cheers
Niclas
On Friday 24 August 2007 14:31, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I'm wondering if there is any interest in the commons releases I tried
to push out at all? So far, only Felix has responded.
I am negatively indifferent. I still maintain that release of wrapping
descriptors are a better way, for reasons
the same third-party jar
will be identical (probably some Build-Date entry will differ), without
effort on your part. Is that bad? Or is it just that you need to use the
Bundle plugin that bothers you? I think it is just that you assumed that you
have to put in an effort...
Cheers
--
Niclas
On 8/15/07, Richard S. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to let everyone know that I have accepted a visiting
assistant professor position at Tufts University in Boston for the
coming school year.
Cool... Brain-wash them to be mindless Felix slaves... ;o)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman
too.
Understood.
I am just surprised to see two jar files with almost identical content, and to
me that is a DRY flag coming up... Although I understand that it is not the
case at source level.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 22:00, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Sling is implemented completely as OSGi Bundles
Good news!
You got my vote already...
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:00, Karl Pauls wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the framework and main binaries in
order to make them available via maven. The jar artifacts, the
signature files, and MD5 message digests are available here:
[x] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.0 framework and main
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:47, Karl Pauls wrote:
I'm not sure I really like the idea that we create all those artifacts
of other projects.
I am sort of -0 on this topic. And that is why Pax Construct (www.ops4j.org)
exists, so it is easy to create and maintain those wrappers at home and
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 03:56, Marcel Offermans wrote:
By the way, is there some consensus about how to make older versions
available? I mean, do we need a download page per release?
http://archive.apache.org
Cheers
Niclas
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 00:55, Richard S. Hall wrote:
In the past we voted on contributions, but since this was basically
developed in a Felix sandbox, I do not think a vote is actually
necessary if we have consensus to promote it.
Agree.
Let's give it a few days for people to voice their
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 13:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Therefore I think its overkill to create a module per wrapped library
and version, like a module for servlet-2.1, another one for servlet-2.2
etc. Once they are released they are not needed anymore.
See others comments.
Essentially, a
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 20:53, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Now, I have the hope that releasing is just a matter of invoking maven
(with the correct arguments).
First step is just the production of a parent pom, for the Commons to depend
on. IMHO, that is not really a release (no tarball) and can
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
vote on accepting this document:
[x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
[ ] 0 -
On Monday 23 July 2007 00:45, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
in order to prepare the commons releases, I would like to change the
parent pom version back to 1.0.0 (currently it's 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT).
Commons does not need the latest and greatest and depending on a
released pom makes releasing easier.
On Sunday 22 July 2007 01:13, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
to sum up:
imho passing a single classpath is OK, perhaps we could do better wrt.
default BND instructions
I disagree. BND needs to understand which jar files are internal to THIS
bundle and what are provided bundles, otherwise it can
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
as well.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Sunday 15 July 2007 20:00, Karl Pauls wrote:
On 7/15/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 07:56, Karl Pauls wrote:
So how do we proceed from here? I'd personally like to pause the vote
and update the source release artifacts to include the LICENSE
On Saturday 14 July 2007 21:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. However, we created release candidates hoping to get feedback early
rather than late...
Sorry that I wasn't available...
Releases needs to get more and more automated, so that the cycle can be
rapidly increased, to 4 times a year
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo