brutus is down. We have links to it.

2005-06-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi: brutus.apache.org is dow for 22 days now. I am not sure what is the future of this, perhaps infra has more to say here. The fact is that in forrestbot we link to brutus (at the end of this page): http://forrest.apache.org/0.7/proposal-asf-forrestbot.html What to do? Best Regards, Antonio

Re: brutus is down. We have links to it.

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: brutus.apache.org is dow for 22 days now. I am not sure what is the future of this, perhaps infra has more to say here. brutus was a test machine and it has deliberatley gone away. The fact is that in forrestbot we link to brutus (at the end of this page):

Review of NOTICE.txt

2005-06-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi: I don't see the jfor.jar in the distro, but we state we use it. Perhaps, we should to update the NOTICE. BTW, I wonder if while we are part of the ASF, we need to state: This product includes software developed by The Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/ Since we are in fact a

Re: Review of NOTICE.txt

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Antonio Gallardo wrote: I don't see the jfor.jar in the distro, but we state we use it. Perhaps, we should to update the NOTICE. I think that it might be in a plugin, perhaps in the whiteboard. RTF plugin? We need to add entries to NOTICE.txt for each license that asks for attribution. I

Re: Review of NOTICE.txt

2005-06-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Dom, 12 de Junio de 2005, 3:02, David Crossley dijo: Antonio Gallardo wrote: I don't see the jfor.jar in the distro, but we state we use it. Perhaps, we should to update the NOTICE. I think that it might be in a plugin, perhaps in the whiteboard. RTF plugin? Sorry, you are right. I

Re: using lenya / forrest for ubuntu documentation?

2005-06-12 Thread Sean Wheller
On Saturday 11 June 2005 19:00, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: i just came across http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/DocumentationTeamMeetingSummary4 especially: snip what=meeting-summary/ Hello Gregor, African Greetings. Good to see you venturing beyond the ASF :-) You may or may not know me from

Re: using lenya / forrest for ubuntu documentation?

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Sean Wheller wrote: One problem I must warn of. It's a religious question, of Java, that you will need to overcome with the ubuntu community, especially people at canonical. Seems that Java is a 4-letter word in the ubuntu community because it is not free. It's silly, I know, but that is

Re: index.html local link is correct?

2005-06-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Dom, 12 de Junio de 2005, 4:07, David Crossley dijo: Antonio Gallardo wrote: David Crossley dijo: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Yes please do, i often wondered. The trouble is that we would need to point to a specific version of that doc which means yet more edits to do at release-time.

[jira] Created: (FOR-539) Improve the release task by using ant filters

2005-06-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo (JIRA)
Improve the release task by using ant filters - Key: FOR-539 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-539 Project: Forrest Type: Improvement Components: Compile Reporter: Antonio Gallardo Priority: Minor

[Reminder] code-freeze starts in 27 hours

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
If anyone still has patches that need to go in the 0.70 release, then we have about 27 hours remaining before the code-freeze starts. Are there any Jira issues that we have missed that have patches attached? The code freeze starts on Monday 2005-06-13 at 14:00 UTC

Re: Versioned Plugins

2005-06-12 Thread Ron Blaschke
Saturday, June 11, 2005, 1:44:39 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: Friday, June 10, 2005, 11:02:52 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: Please note that the Plugin system has been upgraded to allow versioned plugins. I'll upgrade the pod-input plugin as soon as I find time for it, which should

Re: release plan for 0.7

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand will be able to help with the preparation of the first release candidate. He will prepare the Windows release and i will do the UNIX release. However, he will be away on Friday which is the day that we have planned for the second release candidate, if necessary. Also we may need help

Merging view package to locationmap

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hello devs, I am just starting to look into the locationmap. I want to merge the view package from trunk to the locationmap branch but it did not work. I used svn merge -r 179780:190183 /home/thorsten/apache/forrest-trunk/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.viewHelper.xhtml

merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: As we already knew, one of the difficult parts of this release is to get the website docs published properly. We think that we have worked out a better solution and are going to develop that in a new branch. Okay we have worked on this over the last few days, and we

Re: using lenya / forrest for ubuntu documentation?

2005-06-12 Thread Gregor J. Rothfuss
Sean Wheller wrote: thanks for the explanation, sean! One problem I must warn of. It's a religious question, of Java, that you will need to overcome with the ubuntu community, especially people at canonical. Seems that Java is a 4-letter word in the ubuntu community because it is not free.

Re: using lenya / forrest for ubuntu documentation?

2005-06-12 Thread Jerome Gotangco
Hello Gregor and Sean, I am glad to have checked my email late this weekend and even elated to the growing interest our previous meetings and plans have been. As for the issues regarding the use and integration of Lenya and Forrest for the improvement of Ubuntu Documentation, I am sure we will

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Thanks David! Looks like a pretty comprehensive roundup to me. Important perhaps to clarify our goals: - Simplify maintenance and updates - Simplify the structure for users - Create the ability to keep as many old releases online w/o extra efforts just as well as retire the easily if we want

Re: using lenya / forrest for ubuntu documentation?

2005-06-12 Thread Sean Wheller
On Sunday 12 June 2005 15:56, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Some friends in the CO.ZA community are setting a server to run   gnome.org.za. This is new, but would be used to edit docbook xml documents from the GNOME Documentation project checked out from GNOME CVS. Let me know if you would

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: David Crossley wrote: * There is a new tab Other Versions which provides access to 0.6 and 0.8-dev docs. They are not in place yet, but you can see where they will fit. Each version here has all the documents the where previously found in the Docs-Tab in

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Cool! Thanks for doing that. It might not be strictly logical not to have 0.7 listed on the subtabs now, but it looks great and is easy to comprehend. Thanks for tweaking that. -- Ferdinand Soethe

[SVN] HowTo merge dirs from trunk to branch - log

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hello all, after nobody could help me with my question, this small log of how I actually merged the view plugins to the loactionmap branch may be from use for you in the future. First of all read http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch04s03.html#svn-ch-4-sect-3.2

HEADSUP locationmap. View Plugins need to be deployed!!! was Re: svn commit: r190311

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 18:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: thorsten Date: Sun Jun 12 11:35:20 2005 New Revision: 190311 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190311view=rev Log: Enabled view as default seed for the lm. That means you have to follow howto-view-install.xml from

Re: release plan for 0.7

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ferdinand will be able to help with the preparation of the first release candidate. He will prepare the Windows release and i will do the UNIX release. However, he will be away on Friday which is the day that we have planned for the second release candidate, if necessary.

Re: Merging view package to locationmap

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hello devs, I am just starting to look into the locationmap. I want to merge the view package from trunk to the locationmap branch but it did not work. I used svn merge -r 179780:190183

Re: svn commit: r190111 - /forrest/branches/docs_reorg_200506_branch/site-author/content/xdocs/docs/plugins /forrest/branches/docs_reorg_200506_branch/site-author/content/xdocs/docs_0_70/plugins

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Sorry about not getting back sooner, I've been away for the weekend. Fortunately this is a site issue so can be fixed after the code freeze is lifted, just as long as the docs work on release day (which I believe they will). Comments inline... Ross Gardler wrote:

Re: Merging view package to locationmap

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
I already did it and only the view specific stuff, see the other mail for more details. salu2 On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:13 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hello devs, I am just starting to look into the locationmap. I want to merge the view package from trunk to the

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: As we already knew, one of the difficult parts of this release is to get the website docs published properly. We think that we have worked out a better solution and are going to develop that in a new branch. Okay we have worked on this over the

Re: packaging views - how's it work?

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
Tim Williams wrote: I've taken my first look at views and this is great stuff. One thing I don't grasp is how they're packaged in the same way that skins are. It seems that if I create customizations in {project-dir}\src\documentation\resources\templates\*.fv or even

Re: HEADSUP locationmap. View Plugins need to be deployed!!! was Re: svn commit: r190311

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 18:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: thorsten Date: Sun Jun 12 11:35:20 2005 New Revision: 190311 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190311view=rev Log: Enabled view as default seed for the lm. That means you have to follow

Re: Versioned Plugins

2005-06-12 Thread Ross Gardler
Ron Blaschke wrote: I've taken a look at the plugins.xml, and the pod-input entry's URL refers directly to the ZIP, i.e. url=http://www.rblasch.org/projects/pod-input/org.rblasch.forrest.plugin.input.pod.zip; I am wondering if I made a mistake, and the URL should refer to the directory

Re: packaging views - how's it work?

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 22:23 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Tim Williams wrote: I've taken my first look at views and this is great stuff. One thing I don't grasp is how they're packaged in the same way that skins are. It seems that if I create customizations in

View HowTos small questions

2005-06-12 Thread Addi
I've been going through the View HowTos, which are really spot on and easy to follow (thanks Thorsten!). As I'm going, I have been doing a little reader editing, mainly small typos or just sentence flow kind of things. I do have some documentation clarification questions that I wasn't sure

Re: release plan for 0.7

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: Ferdinand will be able to help with the preparation of the first release candidate. He will prepare the Windows release and i will do the UNIX release. However, he will be away on Friday which is the day that we have planned for the second release

Re: View HowTos small questions

2005-06-12 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 18:42 -0400, Addi wrote: I've been going through the View HowTos, which are really spot on and easy to follow (thanks Thorsten!). As I'm going, I have been doing a little reader editing, mainly small typos or just sentence flow kind of things. I do have some

Re: Merging view package to locationmap

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: If you are going to merge I would recommend merging the whole lot. Saves us having different base revisions for different parts of the tree. With respect to how see: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch04s04.html In particular I note that you are using the wrong

Re: Merging view package to locationmap

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: Thanks for proving those red-bean refs. There is always more to learn about svn. Wow, it is a good tool. Mmmm, interesting typo ... s/proving/providing/ -David

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: Thanks David! Looks like a pretty comprehensive roundup to me. Thanks to you too. Big effort. Important perhaps to clarify our goals: - Simplify maintenance and updates - Simplify the structure for users - Create the ability to keep as many old releases online w/o

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: Sorry I've not provided feedback sooner. I've been away. However, here it is now... No worries. We were only recently ready to show the solution anyway, so perfect timing. The navigation link to http://forrest.apache.org/0.8/ is still gives a 404. Will this be fixed

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: If I go to the 0.8 docs (which took me an *age* to find, it is not at all intuitive to go to the 0.7 tab in order to get to the 0.8 docs) there is no indication that I am in 0.8. There is no 0.8 tab (no tab is selected either) and the MOTD says

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: If I go to the 0.8 docs (which took me an *age* to find, it is not at all intuitive to go to the 0.7 tab in order to get to the 0.8 docs) there is no indication that I am in 0.8. There is no 0.8 tab (no tab is selected either) and the MOTD says I am in 0.7. Leaving

[jira] Created: (FOR-540) Typo/reader editing for View HowTos

2005-06-12 Thread Addison Berry (JIRA)
Typo/reader editing for View HowTos --- Key: FOR-540 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-540 Project: Forrest Type: Improvement Components: Documentation and website Versions: 0.7-dev Reporter: Addison Berry

[jira] Updated: (FOR-540) Typo/reader editing for View HowTos

2005-06-12 Thread Addison Berry (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-540?page=all ] Addison Berry updated FOR-540: -- Attachment: howto-view-install.xml.diff howto-view-dsl.xml.diff Attached edit patches for View Install and View DSL. Typo/reader editing for View

Re: svn commit: r190292 - /forrest/branches/docs_reorg_200506_branch/site-author/content/xdocs/temp/bylaws.xml /forrest/branches/docs_reorg_200506_branch/site-author/content/xdocs/trash/bylaws.xml

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
Author: ferdinand Date: Sun Jun 12 09:07:06 2005 New Revision: 190292 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190292view=rev Log: not soo sure about this one. feel free to bring it back into project-tab or older documents 0.7 That draft is fine to go. It is now called guidelines.xml

[jira] Commented: (FOR-391) website docs/site split

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-391?page=comments#action_12313406 ] David Crossley commented on FOR-391: We created a branch to find a better solution. See discussion: Re: release plan for 0.7

[jira] Updated: (FOR-391) website docs/site split

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-391?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-391: --- Attachment: reorg-1.png reorg-2.png reorg-1.png is screenshot showing 0.7 Docs tab with sub-tabs for other versions. reorg-2.png is screenshot

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: If I go to the 0.8 docs (which took me an *age* to find, it is not at all intuitive to go to the 0.7 tab in order to get to the 0.8 docs) there is no indication that I am in 0.8. There is no 0.8 tab (no tab is selected either) and the MOTD

[jira] Commented: (FOR-355) Improved PDF configurability (e.g., TOC, Page Numbers, logo)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-355?page=comments#action_12313412 ] David Crossley commented on FOR-355: Thanks Cyriaque, that is applied now. Your patches are a pleasure to work with. Improved PDF configurability (e.g., TOC, Page Numbers,

Re: merge the docs-reorg branch (Was: release plan for 0.7)

2005-06-12 Thread David Crossley
We have a facility in skinconf for the pelt skin called MOTD Message of the day. It appends the version number to the html title and puts a little notice on the page and in the menu. This was a quick workaround to make sure that it is obvious which set of docs the user is looking at. However,